Cases

254 P.3d 404 (2011) NORTH PEAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ARCHITECTURE PLUS, LTD, an Arizona corporation; and Mark Wayne Fredstrom and Jane Doe Fredstrom, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0017. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. April 26, 2011.

Perretta, J. This appeal arises out of the efforts of the defendant, Linda Jean Johnson, to prohibit the plaintiffs from using, for customary beach activities, the seaward portion of her property situated on Cape Cod Bay in Eastham under claims of implied and prescribed easements. In a detailed and comprehensive decision on cross motions for summary judgment, a Land Court judge concluded that Johnson’s property extended seaward

907 A.2d 99 (2006) 98 Conn.App. 13 STATE of Connecticut v. Bunthan SAM. No. 25795. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 25, 2006. Decided October 10, 2006. *102 Emily Dean, certified legal intern, with whom were Timothy H. Everett, special public defender, and, on the brief, Todd D.

715 F.Supp. 282 (1989) James SPRUNG and the Estate of Audrey Sprung, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. Civ. 88-5082. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, W.D. June 23, 1989. Scott Sumner, Banks, Johnson, Johnson, Colbath & Huffman, John Fitzgerald, Rapid City, S.D., for plaintiffs. Curt Irela

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the pretrial motions of Defendant Fred W. Robinson. Defendant has filed motions to dismiss the indictment, to sever counts for separate trial, to suppress GPS evidence, and for a change of venue. Pretrial matters were referred to Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. The Magistrate Judge recommended in his Second Pretrial Or

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel

762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

991 F.2d 1020 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420 Kay N. BROWN; Gilbert Fennema; Minnie G. Fennema; HaroldJ. Lemmon; Marjorie T. Miller; William C. Findt; WilliamG. Brown; Loyette Eby; David Lawrence; Charles W. Manz,As Trustee for the Manz Family Trust; Jules Belkin; TonyArlotti; Rita G. Thye; Richard O. Slutzky; AlysonSlutzky; Judith Alterman; Central Machine & Welding, Inc.;George F. Ro

492 U.S. 490 (1989) WEBSTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, ET AL. v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES ET AL. No. 88-605. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 26, 1989 Decided July 3, 1989 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *496 William L. Webster, Attorney General of

OPINION EHRLICH, Judge. ¶ 1 Numerous individuals (collectively “the plaintiffs”) have appealed the superior court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice their complaints against Zensano, Inc., and Zen-gen, Inc. (collectively “the defendants”).1 The court ruled that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants and that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim for relief