Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Aurelio Carrillo and Maria G Carrillo”
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AURELIO DURAN GONZALES; MARIA No. 09-35174 C. ESTRADA ; MARIA LUISA MARTINEZ DE MUNGUIA ; IRMA D.C. No. PALACIOS DE BANUELOS; LUCIA 2:06-cv-01411- MUNIZ DE ANDRADE; KARINA MJP NORIS; ADRIANA POUPARINA , Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER AND v. OPINION U.
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Kawano, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
106 Cal.App.3d 937 (1980) 165 Cal. Rptr. 492 KAWANO, INC., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. 18732. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. June 12, 1980. *940 COUNSEL Gray
Morales v. Landraupublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice HerNÁNdez delivered the opinion of the court. On November, 19, 1907, Aurelio and Felicita Morales Oquendo and Justa Belén Oquendo filed a complaint in the District Court of San Juan against Eleuterio Landrau and Paula Cruz Arroyo, alleging the following as the fundamental facts of their action: 1. That Angel Oquendo y Salvachia died in this city without maldng any will, leav
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under