Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Auto Glass 2020, LLC”
PPG Industries Inc v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co Ltdpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 21-2288 _______________ PPG INDUSTRIES INC, a Pennsylvania corporation v. JIANGSU TIE MAO GLASS CO. LTD, a Chinese company; BENHUA WU, an individual; MEI ZHANG, an individual, Appellants ___________
20-1931-cv Revitalizing Auto Cmtys. Env’t Response Tr. v. Nat’l Grid USA UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: May 28, 2021 Decided: August 18, 2021 Docket No. 20-1931-cv REVITALIZING AUTO COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TRUST,
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOLT FACTORY LOFTS OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC., a Colorado nonprofit corporationpublic domain
487 P.3d 276 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
IMO: The Estate of Lawrence E. Mergenthalerpublic domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734
ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL * NO. 2020-CA-0043 BOARD * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT AND NORMAN WHITE, IN HIS * OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE STATE OF LOUISIANA CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER * * * * * * * FOR THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS APPEAL FROM CIVIL DIST
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by PA DEP v. Monsanto Co., Solutia Inc. and Pharmacia LLCpublic domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting : by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : Department of Environmental : Protection and the Commonwealth of : Pennsylvania Department of : Conservation and Natural Resources, : and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat : Commission, and the Pennsylvania : Game Commission, : Plaintiffs :
Cari Ann Jackson v. Harps Food Stores, Inc.public domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 475 Reason: I attest to the ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS accuracy and integrity of this document DIVISIONS II & III Date: 2021-07-15 11:54:22 No. CV-20-35 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 9.7.5 OPINION DELIVERED: OCTOBER 21, 2020 CARI ANN JACKSON
Ryan Scott Fisher v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Jun 24 2025, 8:59 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
Banks v. Boothpublic domain
ATTACHMENT B Case 1:20-cv-00849-CKK Document 138 Filed 12/12/20 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EDWARD BANKS, ef al., Plaintiffs, Vv. No. 1:20-cv-849 (CKK) QUINCY BOOTH, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, ef al., Defendants. REPORT SUBMITTED BY AMICUS CURIAE PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 ORDER (Table of Contents, Report Narrative, Index to Exhibits, Appendix A Exhibits 1A — 6 and Appe
Moore v. Pool Corp.public domain
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case concerns the way in which plaintiff Fred Moore's employer responded when Mr. Moore, who is African-American, complained that one of his customers *1152repeatedly called him a "nigger." Mr. Moore asserts that the customer's behavior was intolerable because the customer demeaned h
In Re BRUNETTIpublic domain
Case: 23-1539 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: ERIK BRUNETTI, Appellant ______________________ 2023-1539 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 88308426, 88308434, 88308451, 883
DISSENTING Opinion Filed November 29, 2021 In the Court of Appeals Stith Avatrict of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01480-CV PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, L.L.C. AND JAMES C. LANKFORD, Appellants V. THE LAW COMPANY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762 DISSENTING OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle Dissenting Opinion by Justice Carlyle The majority here reverses and remands a default judgment, thus
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERpublic domain
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
Crawford v. Am. Family Ins. Co.public domain
[Cite as Crawford v. Am. Family Ins. Co., 2024-Ohio-5345.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY LESLIE CRAWFORD : : Appellant : C.A. No. 30157 : v.
USCA11 Case: 23-12715 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 03/05/2025 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12715 ____________________ LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE
PEGGY HAYNES * NO. 2023-CA-0678 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL SEWERAGE AND WATER * BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
Thomas McLamb v. NLRBpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 21, 2025 Decided July 1, 2025 No. 24-1218 THOMAS HENRY MCLAMB, PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Alyssa K. Hazelwood argued the ca
In Re XENCOR, INC.public domain
Case: 24-1870 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: XENCOR, INC., Appellant ______________________ 2024-1870 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 16/803,690. ____________
VIP, Inc. v. KYB Corp.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0053p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ┐ ___________________________________________ │ │ VIP, INC.; P
VIP, Inc. v. KYB Corp.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0053p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ┐ ___________________________________________ │ │ VIP, INC.; PERFORMANC