Cases

OPINION Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing and, on our own motion, withdraw our opinion dated December 29, 2014, and vacate the judgment of that date. This is now the opinion of the Court. Appellant Baron Ablon appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in setting aside an order as void and in gr

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01465-CV BARON ABLON, Appellant V.

Order entered November 20, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01465-CV BARON ABLON, Appellant V. BARI ABLON CAMPBELL, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

319 Ga. 825 FINAL COPY S25A0177. AL-BARI et al. v. PIGG et al. S25A0178. WEST v. WITTENSTEIN et al. S25A0179. CLAPP et al. v. PIGG et al. S25A0180. RAFFENSPERGER v. PIGG et al. S25A0181. GEORGIA REPUBLICAN PARTY, INC. v. PIGG et al. S25A0182. RAFFENSPERGER v. PIGG et al. S25A0183. GEORGIA REPUBLICAN PARTY, INC. v. PIGG et al. S25X0184. PIGG et al. v. RAFFENSPERGER et al. WARREN, Justice. When Georgians go to the polls to vote

Opinion issued August 29, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00353-CV ——————————— BARI RUGGERI AND ROBERT RUGGERI, Appellants V. BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, Appellee

OPINION BY President Judge DAN PELLEGRINI. This matter involves three appeals involving the Office of Open Records’ (OOR) release of records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) 1 relating to West Chester University’s (WCU) proposed separation from the State System of Higher Education (SSH

466 S.E.2d 536 (1995) 195 W.Va. 685 CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellant, v. Samantha STAMPER, Appellee, and CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellant, v. John B. CONLEY and Garnett Conley, Appellees. CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellee, v. Samantha STAMPER, Appellant, and CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellee, v. John B. CONLEY and Garnett Conley, Appellants. Nos. 22853, 22880. Su

FILED July 30, 2025 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OF WEST VIRGI

912 F.Supp. 382 (1996) Ora METCALF, Plaintiff, v. WEST SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, Dr. Marjorie Shreve, and Circle Family Care, Defendants. No. 95 C 2784. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 5, 1996. *383 Richard F. Mallen, Donald Hoppe, Law Office of Richard F. Mallen, Chicago, Illinois, for Plaintiff.<

MEMORANDUM OPINION A. Benjamin Goldgar, United States Bankruptcy ¿Judge Jonathan Glick is an entrepreneur. In the early 2000s, Glick did business in the children’s toy and consumer goods industries through a complex web of limited liability companies and partnerships. A trust established in 1999 was the ultimate owner of these entities, but practically speaking Glick ran them all. One of Glick’s principal

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Alan Robinson appeals the dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and, in the alternative, forum non conve-niens (“f.n.c.”). We reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand. I. In 1983, Robinson, an English citizen and resident, helped found Croydon Cable

117 F.3d 900 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,495Alan ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TCI/US WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC., TeleWest CommunicationsPLC, U.S. West Inc., Telecommunications, Inc., StephenDavidson, Gary Bryson, Kleinwort Benson Limited, andKleinwort Benson of North America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-50554. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.

FILED January 18, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS West Virginia Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission, FILED Petitioner July 27, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 15-0099

CRIST, Judge. Appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Defendant (Contractor) concerning a finder’s fee agreement. Joseph Projects alleged it and Contractor entered into a finder’s fee agreement, whereby Joseph Projects agreed to find construction projects on which Contractor could bid for mechanical work, and Contractor agreed to pay Plaintiff 4.54 per cent of the total amount rece

43 S.W.3d 390 (2001) Irl B. BARIS, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. v. Ralph LAYTON and Loraine Layton, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, No. ED 76562. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. February 20, 2001. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 5, 2001. Application to Transfer Denied May 29, 2001.

655 F.Supp.2d 473 (2009) BONNIEVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC; Juan F. and Rafael Hernandez; Rene N. and Stephen J. Hrop; Renee K. Goodlow and Michael R. Berry; Yuangen Zhu and Qi Liu; G. Thomas and Sharon Perrone; San Chee and George Lee; Parhat and Sema Yasar; Fazal and Sanyakhan Bari; James and Diane Sadowski; Daniel and Pauline Roh; Louise Ann and Bruce Dostal; Joseph and Bobbi Intile; Yi Lu and Bruce Tang; and Keith Hamilton, Plaintiffs, v.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is Jet Midwest, Inc.’s (“JMI”) motion for allowance of an unsecured rejection damages claim (the “Motion”). [See ECF No. 1630]. JMI seeks allowance of its claim for damages arising from the debtors’ rejection of an unexpired lease of nonresidential real property, despite having missed the deadline for filing such

May, J. This is a case of the missing link—the claim servicer’s standing to pursue negligence claims against a property appraiser, A third-party claim servicer appeals an order dismissing its amended complaint against an individual and his company for negligence- in the appraisal of the mortgaged property. It argues the trial court erred in dismissing the amended complaint with pr

SCALES, J. In this mortgage foreclosure case, Humberto Terant, et al, the defendant/borrower, appeals the trial court’s sequestration order requiring that all revenues generated from the subject property be deposited into the registry of the court. We affirm the trial court’s order because, as defendant properly concedes, the error was not preserved, and the trial court’s erro