Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BARRON v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC”
Barron v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 240066 No. 1-24-0066 First Division June 30, 2025 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
Hansen v. Barron's Oilfield Services, Incpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Alfredo Barron and Eda Barron v. Richard L. Pfirmanpublic domain
Opinion issued February 26, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00153-CV ——————————— ALFREDO BARRON AND EDA BARRON, Appellants V. RICHARD L. PFIRMAN, Appellee
Barron v. Vision Service Planpublic domain
(2008) Mark BARRON, Plaintiff, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, Defendant. No. 3:07CV3902. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 30, 2008. ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge. This case involves the alleged breach of a contract. Plaintiff Mark Barron, an Ohio-based optometrist, alleges that defendant Vision Service Plan [VSP], a
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00064-CV ___________________________ SIMONE BARRON AND WALID YAMMINE, Appellants V. ISSAM AL SHMAISANI AND
Lenk, J. The personal injury protection (PIP) provision of the automobile insurance statute permits an unpaid party to bring an action for breach of contract against an automobile insurer if the latter has not paid PIP benefits for more than thirty days after those benefits became due and payable. G. L. c. 90, § 34M, fourth par. If the
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TILLMAN NATURE PRESERVE LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Petitioner, v. DANIEL BABUSH, an individual; DAYFLOWER JV, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; SERGIO ATANES, an individual; IRENE ATANES, an individual; MARK PARKER, an individual; JEANETTE SCH
Merrick, J. The plaintiff, Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. (“Barron”), provided chiropractic treatment to its patient, Nicole Jean Pierre, for injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident in which the patient was an occupant of a vehicle insured by the defendant, Norfolk & Dedham Group (“Norfolk & Dedham”). Barron alleges that it is an “unpaid party” under G.L.c. 90, §34M because Norfolk & Dedham has
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTERNATIONAL RAIL PARTNERS, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1029-PAF ) AMERICAN RAIL PARTNERS, LLC, ) GULF & ATLANTIC RAILWAYS, ) LLC, and NEWCO SBS HOLDINGS, ) LLC, ) ) Defendants. )
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 566 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 567 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Supreme Court No. 2024-47-M.P. (No. 22-1913) Rhode Island Truck Center, LLC : v. : Daimler Trucks North America, LLC. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supr
Bryan Range v. Attorney General United Statespublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________
BPP069, LLC v. Lindfield Holdings, LLCpublic domain
Brown, Judge. BPP069, LLC ("the buyer") appeals from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Lindfield Holdings, LLC and Damon Barner (collectively "the defendants") on its complaint for fraud arising out of the sale of real property in the City of Newnan ("the City"). The buyer asserts that its fraud claim should have been submitted to the jury because (1) the defendants "knowingly misrepresented the zoning st
Gattineri v. Wynn MA, LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1117 ANTHONY GATTINERI, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. WYNN MA, LLC; WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. F. Dennis Saylor, IV, Chief U.S. District Judge]
Salenga v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc.public domain
183 Cal.App.4th 986 (2010) SUEZANE SALENGA, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS CREDIT OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents. No. D055228. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. April 9, 2010. As modified April 26, 2010. *991 Kemnitzer, Anderson, Barr
SUPERIOR COURT OLD IRONSIDES ENERGY LLC v. MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY LLC; MARSH LLC; MARSH USA INC.; JOHN KURKULONIS, JR.; AND EDWARD D. FITZGERALD Docket: 1984CV00912-BLS2 Dates: June 9, 2025
Lalli v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc.public domain
*2 STAHL, Circuit Judge. From August 2009 through January 2013, Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph Lalli (“Plaintiff’ or “Lalli”) was employed by General Nutrition Centers, Inc. and General Nutrition Corp. (collectively, “Defendants” or “GNC”) as a store manager. Lalli challenged his compensation arrangement under th
Eric A. Lannon v. Pherian, LLCpublic domain
ERIC A. LANNON * NO. 2024-CA-0757 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL PHERIAN, LLC * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2024-05738, DIVISION “E” Honorable O