Cases

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED LETINA CARTER, December 23, 2024 Claimant Below, Petitioner ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings (2024 NY Slip Op 01008) Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings 2024 NY Slip Op 01008 Decided on February 28, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department

211-12 N. Blvd. Corp. v LIC Contr., Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 04134) 211-12 N. Blvd. Corp. v LIC Contr., Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 04134 Decided on July 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Leventhal, J.p., J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. Three scientists walk into a lab. They emerge with an important scientific discovery but, as is frequently the case, a contentious patent dispute later arises. After nearly a decade of litigation that has spanned two federal judges, and produced enough pages of memoranda to clear a forest, Plaintiffs still have not officially unlocked the doors

OPINION OF THE COURT Robert J. McDonald, J. Upon a motion by plaintiff Michael R. Toppin for summary judgment on the issue of liability as against Church of God of St. Albans, Mike’s Contracting Building and Development Corp., and Harold E. Gebhard, A.I.A., and cross motion by defendant Miltiadis Leptourgos for summary judgment in his favor pursuant to CPLR 3212, it is ordered that the motion is granted a

423 F.Supp.2d 708 (2006) Denise HUGHES and Bob Hughes, Plaintiffs, v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING, a Michigan municipal corporation; Bruce King, individually and as Executive Director of Region VII Area Agency on Aging; Drew Orvosh, individually and as Assistant Director of Region VII Area Agency on Aging; Brian K. Edler; and Learman, Peters, Sarow & McQuillan, P.L.C., Defendants. No. 04-10355 BC.

380 F.Supp.2d 852 (2005) Carol EGE, Petitioner, v. Joan YUKINS, Respondent. No. 01-10294-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. July 22, 2005. *853 *854 *855 *856

312 B.R. 606 (2004) In re BLI FARMS, partnership, Richard Jerry Bli, Charlotte Bli, James and Pearl Bli, Debtors, Bli Farms, Appellant, v. Greenstone Farm Credit Services, FCLA, and its assignee USA Farm Service Agency, Appellee. No. 03-10134-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. July 26, 2004. *610

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 365 II. Background .. .366 A. Factual Background ... 366 1. PBX Systems and Maintenance ...366 2. PDS Systems and Maintenance ...369 3. The Dispute

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendant Anne L. Reinhart appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Martin, J.), dated March 18, 2013, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her. Ordered that the order is modified,

K.K. Mach. Co., Inc. v Grillo (2025 NY Slip Op 05225) K.K. Mach. Co., Inc. v Grillo 2025 NY Slip Op 05225 Decided on October 1, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

MEMORANDUM LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge. Plaintiff investors in Diagnostic Ventures, Inc. (DVI) sue for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, *50117 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5,1 and imposition of liability under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15

DECISION AND ORDER BERMAN, District Judge. Steven M. Wagner (“Wagner” or “Claimant”) seeks damages resulting from injuries he allegedly sustained (to his shoulder) while scuba diving in the British Virgin Islands on December 23,1994. Wagner alleges that the injury resulted from the negligence of Illusions Holdings, Inc. (“Illusions” or “Petitioner”), which is the owner of the boat named ILLUSIO

978 F.Supp. 1105 (1997) CHEM-NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARIVEC CHEMICALS, INC., Lockheed Corp., the United States of America, and the U.S. Dept. of the Air force, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:95-CV-1809-JTC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. February 10, 1997. *1106 Frank A. Lightmas, Jr.,

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendants Rokeya Begum and Rifad Bepary, also known as Bobby Bepary, appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Greco, Jr., J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against them, and (2) so much of an order of the same court entered October 4, 2016, as,

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. *1240Dkt. # 122. The Court held oral argument on May 1, 2018, after which the Court directed the parties to submit additional briefing.

OPINION & ORDER HAROLD BAER, JR., District Judge: Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine (“Touro”) and Jerry Cammarata, the Dean of Student Affairs at Touro (collectively, “Defendants”) against Plaintiff Michael Maximilian Wolfgang Roggenbach (“Plaintiff’). Plaintiff alleges that Touro discriminated against him under § 5

OPINION OF THE COURT Rivera, J. In this appeal, arising out of a criminal prosecution for, inter alia, violations of Environmental Conservation Law § 17-0701 (1) (a) and § 71-1933 (4) (a) (i), the primary issue presented, which is one of first impression, is whether the People must prove the culpable mental state “knowingly,” as defined under Penal Law § 15.05 (2), with regard to each and every element of

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens *715 County (Sampson, J.), entered June 20, 2014, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

(2008) Brent WOOLEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON HEWITT, INC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, Inc.; Farrukh Sohail; Smart Tax, Inc. d/b/a Jackson Hewitt Tax Service; Ask Tax, Inc. d/b/a Jackson Hewitt Tax Service; and Certain Unknown Jackson Hewitt Franchisees # 1-100, Defendants. No. 07 C 2201. United States District Court, N