Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Opinion PER CURIAM. In this matter, the defendant, Anne M. Bradley, was found guilty by a jury of breach of the peace in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181 (6). The defendant thereafter moved for a judgment of acquittal, which the trial court granted on July 7, 2008. The state then filed a motion requesting permission to appeal, which the trial court granted. The state appea

(2008) Dave SHELDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Tara KHANAL, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-2112-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 27, 2008. Order On Motion for Reconsideration for Leave to Serve Discovery or Transfer August 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. Dave She

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. *498 Roy C. Bradley, Sr. appeals his conviction for conspiring to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 .

724 A.2d 351 (1999) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Thomas P. BRADLEY, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 13, 1998. Filed January 12, 1999. *352 A. Sheldon Kovach, Asst. Dist. Atty., Media, for the Com., appellant. Andrew Donaghy, Media, for appellee. Before McEWEN, President Judge, and

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about August 2, 1999, which modified orders of the Civil Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered on or about February 5, 1997, denying attorneys’ fees to both sides and awarding the landlord prejudgment interest on unpaid rent, to the extent of ruling that the landlord is entitled to attorneys’ fees, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of

People v Bradley (2019 NY Slip Op 08062) People v Bradley 2019 NY Slip Op 08062 Decided on November 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Charles E. Bradley, et al. (“plaintiffs”), appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Ellen Bree Burns, Judge, dismissing their complaint seeking inter-pleader pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 22 against two defendants, each of whom has commenced an action against plaintiffs. The district court dismissed the complaint on the

Bradley v Konakanchi (2018 NY Slip Op 06413) Bradley v Konakanchi 2018 NY Slip Op 06413 Decided on September 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. The petitioners-appellants, Sheldon and Anita Drobny, are husband and wife. During the late 1970’s, Sheldon Drobny, a former IRS agent, was a partner in the accounting firm of Adler & Drobny, Ltd., based near Chicago, Illinois. Drobny promoted (and he and his wife invested in) two “research and development” programs purportedly designed to develop the su

OPINION HILLMAN, Senior District Judge. Before the court is the motion of Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”) and Sheldon Altman (“Altman”) to enjoin and dismiss plaintiffs’ claim under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”), M.C.L. § 445.901 et seq. This claim is presently pending before a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) arbitration panel. For the re

W. SHARP, Judge, concurring in result only. In my view, the “first to file” or win the race to the courthouse in not and should not be determinative of jurisdiction pursuant to the UCCJA where one state is the home state and the other has no basis to assume child custody jurisdiction. Nor should a parent be disadvantaged because he or she appeared and opposed subject matter jurisdiction in a state which la

OPINION RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS HILLMAN, Senior District Judge. This case arose from the admitted embezzlement of $185,000 from plaintiffs’ ERISA funds by Michael Smith, a former partner of Dolinka, Smith & VanNoord (“DSV”). Smith was criminally charged, convicted and sentenced. On July 2,1993, on motion the court dismissed defendants Baird, Oppenheimer and Sheldon Altman, 82

858 F.Supp. 663 (1994) SHELDON COMPANY PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael K. SMITH, et al., Defendants. No. 1:92-CV-189. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 21, 1994. *664 *665 *666 Peter W. Steke

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2020 VT 50

MANION, Circuit Judge. Sheldon Konowitz filed suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, after his transfer and subsequent demotion by his employer, Schnadig Corporation (Schnadig). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Schnadig, and Konowitz appeals. We affirm. I. Background

Opinion FLIER, J. In 2006, we affirmed the convictions of appellants, Omar Bradley, Amen Rahh, and John Johnson II, for misappropriation and misuse of public funds under Penal Code section 424. Appellants were former high officials of the City of Compton (Compton or City).1 Appellants were alleged to have misappropriated and misused public funds by (1) charging personal expenses to the

115 Cal.App.3d 744 (1981) 171 Cal. Rptr. 487 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT SHELDON BRADLEY, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 11640. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. February 4, 1981. *747 COUNSEL Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, under appointment

828 F.Supp. 1262 (1993) SHELDON COMPANY PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST, Sheldon Company Defined Benefit Plan and Trust (Terminated); and George Cares, Paul Cares, and Louis Cares, as individuals and as Trustees of both Trusts, Plaintiffs, v. Michael K. SMITH, as an individual and as a partner or former partner in Dolinka, Smith & Van Noord, a Michigan partnership; Marvin J. Dolinka, Harold J. Smith, Kenneth Van Noord, Gerald R. Vander Lugt, an

501 F.3d 421 (2007) In the Matter of: Gary L. BRADLEY, Debtor. Gary L. Bradley, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Ronald E. Ingalls, Trustee; Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Thomas Thompson, Trustee of and on Behalf of the Lazarus Exempt Trust, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. In the Matter of: Gary L. Bradley, Debtor. Ronald Ingalls, Appellant, v. Lazarus Investments LP; Castle Realty Management LLC; Thomas Thompson, in his capacity