Cases

J-S54035-19 2020 PA Super 287 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CHARLES FLOYD :

J-S54035-19 2020 PA Super 287 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CHARLES FLOYD :

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01052-CV IN THE ESTATE OF FLOYD E. DIXON, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 377,211 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal fro

732 F.Supp. 243 (1990) Yvonne FLOYD-MAYERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN CAB CO., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-1777 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 20, 1990. John C. Keeney, Jr., Craig A. Hoover, L. Anthony Sutin, and William P. Flanagan of Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D.C. and Joseph M. Sellers and Avis E. Buchanan of W

COLLINS, J. The defendants stand convicted of the offense of grand larceny in the first degree. On appeal it is contended by their counsel that the verdict of guilty was vitiated by certain alleged irregularities and misconduct during the trial on the part of the prosecuting attorney and on the part of some of the jurors, and also that the court erred when making a statement to the jury relative to current rumors as to misconduct

113 F.3d 988 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3379, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 5849Barbara MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Dan GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, Dan Shaw, Thomas VonGarlem, Larry Fleming, Charles Matthews, Pablo R. Reyes,Diane Bowman Friend, Ken White, John Smythe, Floyd Cotton,Ralph Thompson, Freddie Lee, and John Wright Moore,Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17435. U

136 S.W.3d 419 (2004) Floyd DAVIS and Lloyd Davis, Appellants, v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., Appellee. No. 07-02-0394-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. May 27, 2004. *420 Don Graf, McCleskey Harriger Brazill & Graf, L.L.P., Lubbock, for appellants. W. Clayton Gaston, Canon, Gaston & Strain, L.L.P

272 Kan. 1350 (2002) 39 P.3d 38 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. FLOYD SCOTT BLEDSOE, Appellant. No. 85,735. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed February 1, 2002. Mary Curtis, assistant appellate defender, argued the cause, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, was with her on the briefs for appellant. Jim A.

Case: 14-41127 Document: 00512802898 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 14, 2014

OPINION JOHN T. BOYD, Senior Justice (Retired). Ronnie Puckett, owner of property ordered forfeited by a judgment of the 287th District Court of Parmer County, brings this appeal challenging that judgment to the extent it divests him of certain real property in Parmer County. His sole point of error, arises from the Stat

28 Kan. App.2d 104 (2000) 13 P.3d 17 LARRY L. REBARCHEK, Appellant, v. FARMERS COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR AND MERCANTILE ASSOCIATION OF DIGHTON, KANSAS, and FLOYD G. BARBER, Appellees. No. 82,662. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed November 3, 2000. *106 John L. Carmichael, of Wilson, Lee and Gurne

20 Kan. App. 2d 90 (1994) STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. PHILLIP BRIAN HOUDYSHELL and FLOYD F. HOUDYSHELL, Appellants. No. 71,250 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed November 4, 1994. Gregory G. Lower, of Cassell & Lower, of Wichita, and Dennis D. Webb, of Wichita, for appellant. Chris O. Concannon, county attorney, and Robert

18 Kan. App. 2d 435 (1993) 856 P.2d 934 FLOYD CARMICHAEL, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. No. 67,757 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed June 25, 1993. Julie Gorenc, assistant appellate defender, James F. Vano, special appellate defender, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, for the appellant.

Brazil, J.: Floyd M. Nugent appeals his conviction of robbery, K.S.A. 21-3426, claiming the court erred by failing to suppress the victim’s on-scene identification and all items seized from his van pursuant to a search incident to his arrest. Nugent claims that, although Officer Craig Caster may have had articulable suspicion to stop him, Caster’s actions exceeded that of a stop pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20

BY THE COURT. A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.<

ORDER RE DISCOVERY WAYNE D. BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge. The court held a discovery hearing in the above captioned case on March 7, 1991. Having considered the parties’ oral and written submissions, and having conducted an in camera review of certain documents, the court hereby enters the opinion and the orders that follow. Introduction

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: *795 This appeal by the state of Texas follows remand from the en banc court concerning the state's former photo voter ID law ("SB 14"). During the remand, the Texas legislature passed a law designed to cure all the flaws cited in evidence when the case was f

People v Padilla (2022 NY Slip Op 03804) People v Padilla 2022 NY Slip Op 03804 Decided on June 09, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Padilla (2022 NY Slip Op 01884) People v Padilla 2022 NY Slip Op 01884 Decided on March 17, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: In 2011, Texas (“the State”) passed Senate Bill 14 (“SB 14”), which requires individuals to present one of several forms of photo identification in order to vote. See Act of May 16, 2011, 82d Leg., R.S., ch. 123, 2011 Tex. Gen. Laws 619. Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the constitutionality and legality of the law. The district court held that SB 14 was enacted with a racially discriminatory