Cases

05/04/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 25, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALFRED MARON WILLIAMS, ERIC MARTEL ABRAMS, AND JAMIE PAUL CLICK Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 102707 Steven W. Sword, Judge

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1453 Doc: 75 Filed: 03/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1453 DONNA BUETTNER-HARTSOE; N.H., by and through her Parent and Next Friend Donna Buettner-Hartsoe, Plaintiffs - Appell

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1823 ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.; BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC.; BERETTA U.S.A. CORP.; GLOCK, INC.; STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC.; WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC., d/b/a Interstate Arms; CENTURY INTERNATIONAL ARMS, INC.; BARETTA HOLDINGS SPA; GLOCK GES.M.B.H.

*343Opinion KENNARD, J. On October 9, 1991, defendant Gregory Scott Smith pled guilty to (1) first degree murder in violation of Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a);1 (2) kidnapping in violation of section 207, subdivision (a); (3) arson in violation of section 451, subdivisions (c) and (d); (4) commission of a forcible l

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 554 (2005) 35 Cal.4th 334 107 P.3d 229 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gregory Scott SMITH, Defendant and Appellant. No. S026223. Supreme Court of California. March 10, 2005. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 2005. Certiorari Denied October 31, 2005.

Case: 18-51092 Document: 00515519674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED A

ACCEPTED 04-15-00097-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/29/2015 8:55:56 PM KEITH HOTTLE

10-583-cr(L) United States v. Coplan UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2011 (Argued: November 14, 2011 Decided: November 29, 2012) _______________________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ROBERT COP

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-01229-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ANITA APPELLANT VIRGINIA RISH HITT, DECEASED: SHERON YANCEY DUNN v. CHARLOTTE YANCEY HART, YVONNE APPELLEES YANCEY WIDMER, DONNA ANN HITT BROOKS, AND ROBERT DREW HITT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/17/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

103 S.W.3d 487 (2003) Brian BOOKER and Donna Booker, Individually and as Next Friends to Chase Booker and Avery Booker, Appellants, v. REAL HOMES, INC., Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company, and Marvin Windows, Inc., Appellees. No. 04-02-00122-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 15, 2003. Opinion on Denial of Rehearing February 26, 2003. <

Filed 12/19/13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S118629 v. ) ) ROBERT LEE WILLIAMS, JR., ) ) Riverside County Defendant and Appellant. )

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Objector-Appellant S. Michael Scheeringa challenges the district court’s order requiring UnitedHealth Group, Inc., (United-Health) to reimburse derivative counsel for online-research expenses that counsel incurred while litigating a shareholder-derivative suit that ended in a large recovery pursuant to a settlement agreement. In response, Appellees filed a motion to dismiss Scheeringa’s appeal, arguing t

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. Table of Contents I. Legal Background.561 II. ILEC Objections. A. Unbundling of Mass Market Switches 1. Subdelegation of § 251(d)(2) impairment determinations to state commissions . 2. Impairment in provision of mass market switching. 3. The Commission’s definition o

Jackson v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 03183) Jackson v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 03183 Decided on May 28, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER SULLIVAN,- District Judge. Plaintiffs, Bellaire Corporation (“Bellaire”), Allied-Signal, Inc. (“Allied”), Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“AECI”), and Association of Bituminous Contractors, Inc. (“ABC”), commenced' these separate lawsuits against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“federal defendant”) and the United Mine Workers of A

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. MILLETT, Circuit Judge: “Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds.” 1 But a bad economy might. Or so the Postal Service worried when the recent recession caused ma

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC

02-11-378--390-CV_COR

OPINION EN BANC COFFIN, Circuit Judge. These multiple appeals from drug conspiracy convictions resulted in reversals by a panel of our court, which found that a section of the Massachusetts wiretap statute, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 272, § 99 F(1), identifying officials empowered to apply for wiretap warrants, afforded less procedural protection than did the comparable section of the federal statute, 18 U.S.C.