Cases

Case: 13-30580 Document: 00512790599 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-30580 October 2, 2014

516 F.Supp.2d 660 (2007) ENERGYTEC, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Philip M. PROCTOR, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 3:06-CV-871-L, 3:06-CV-933-L. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. April 30, 2007. *661 *662 Jeffrey M. Tillotson, Christopher J. Schwegm

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced putative class action alleges violations of the following securities -fraud statutes through ■ Defendants’ scheme to optimize revenue in investment banking fees from UBS Securities LLC’s corporate client, Enron Corp. (“Enron”), at the expense and defrauding of UBS Financial Service’s brokerage retail clients, Lead Plaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRATYA SPRL, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-02541 (TNM) BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Ryan Cohen is a billionaire investor and entrepreneur who became internet famous during the

18-2811 (L) United States v. Blaszczak United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2019 Docket Nos. 18-2811, 18-2825, 18-2867, 18-2878 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DAVID BLASZCZAK, THEODORE HUBER, ROBERT O

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction The board of Chevron, the oil and gas major, has adopted a bylaw providing that litigation relating to Chevron’s internal affairs should be conducted in Delaware, the state where Chevron is incorporated and whose substantive law Chevron’s stockholders know governs the corporation’s internal affairs. The board of the logistics company

C. Kathryn Preston, United States Bankruptcy Judge The automatic stay is one of the most fundamental protections of the Bankruptcy *438Code. It provides debtors the breathing room they need for a fresh start and it protects the interests of other creditors by preventing a single creditor from "racing to the courthouse" and obtaining payments on

*310MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The present case is a consolidated securities fraud class action brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities that purchased the publicly traded securities of Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (“Gentiva”) between July 31, 2008 and October 4, 2011. The complaint was filed by

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs (IPPs), together with Pentair Water Pool & Spa, Inc. (Pentair), move the Court to preliminarily approve a class action settlement between IPPs and Pentair.1 The parties also move the Court to certify a class for the purpose of the Pentair settlement. For the following reasons, the Co

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The present case is a consolidated securities fraud class action brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities that purchased the publicly traded securities of Gentiva Health Services (“Gentiva”) between July 31, 2008 and October 4, 2011. Presently before the Court is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth belo

586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e