Cases

SAUFLEY, J. [¶ 1] We are called upon in this case to determine whether Maine’s education tuition program, which explicitly excludes religious schools from receipt of state funds, violates any section of the United States or Maine Constitution. Because we conclude that it does not, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.). I. BACKGROUND [¶2] The m

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) BAGLEY V. SARGENT NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). RYAN BAGLEY, APPELLANT, V.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. In July 2015, Stephen Bagley pleaded guilty to carjacking and firearm charges, pursuant to a written plea agreement that contained a waiver of the right to challenge his conviction and sentence. Bagley admitted that he stole a Nissan Altima at gun point with the car owner's dog (Mister) in the backseat, that the police later responded to a multi-vehicle car accide

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S OMNIBUS MOTION CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND RELATED ISSUES HAIGHT, Senior District Judge Plaintiff has filed an Omnibus Motion [Doc. 172] which requests an order granting seven separate forms of relief, most related to pretrial discovery and related issues. Defendants oppose these requests almost in their entirety. The issues have been thoroughly briefed by counsel. This Ruling resolves

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Nine commodity options dealers and the National Association of Commodity Option Dealers (NASCOD) in this consolidated action challenge new rules that regulate the commodity options industry. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) promulgated the rules under authority granted in 1974 by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act, Pub.L. 93-463, 88 Stat. 1389, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-22 (Supp. V,

PALMER, J. The issue presented by this appeal is whether, in an action brought pursuant to Connecticut's Product Liability Act (act), General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., under strict liability and negligence theories, expert testimony was necessary to prove that a defective, asbestos containing product caused a worker who came in contact with that product to contract a fatal lung diseas

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: This is an action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). Supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 is as

561 F.3d 636 (2009) Mark W. WILES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 05-3719. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 11, 2008. Decided and Filed: April 14, 2009. *637 ARGUED: John J. Ricotta, LAW OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Adam Michael

402 F.Supp. 974 (1975) AMERICAN BOARD OF TRADE, INC., Plaintiff, v. William T. BAGLEY, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, et al., Defendants. No. 75 Civ. 4223 (HFW). United States District Court, S. D. New York. October 17, 1975. *975 Richard Nathan, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for defendants except United

657 F.3d 338 (2011) Bobby T. SHEPPARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 09-3472. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 9, 2011. Decided and Filed: September 13, 2011. *341 ARGUED: Melissa J. Jackson, Federal Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio,

685 F.Supp.2d 904 (2010) Colleen BAGLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rod BLAGOJEVICH, et al., Defendants. Case No. 05-cv-3156. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. January 15, 2010. *905 John A. Baker, Baker Baker & Krajewski LLC, John Edward Kerley, Kerley & Associates PC, Springfield, IL, for Pl

*590ORDER DENYING REMAND DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action was commenced on August 5, 2011 in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama for personal injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiff as a result of ingesting Yasmin and Oeella (a generic version of Yasmin). Plaintiff, a citizen of Alabama, br

646 F.3d 378 (2011) Colleen BAGLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rod R. BLAGOJEVICH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-1389. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 22, 2010. Decided May 2, 2011. *379 John A. Baker (argued), Attorney, Baker, Baker & Krajewski, Springfield, IL,

CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Petitioner’s counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment by failing to adequately *972investigate and prepare mitigating evidence for the penalty phase of Petitioner’s trial. I would therefore vacate Petitioner’s sentence and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.<

MERRITT, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MARTIN, J., joined. SILER, J. (pp. 664-65), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. This Ohio death penalty case turns on the validity of certain ■ jury instructions that impose a mandatory death penalty that must be addressed first by the jury before consideration

SERCOMBE, J. Plaintiff Bagley, after suffering serious injuries while snowboarding over a “jump” in defendant Mt. Bachelor, Inc.’s (Mt. Bachelor) “terrain park,” brought this action alleging negligence in the design, construction, maintenance, or inspection of that jump.1 The trial court granted Mt. Bachelor’s motion for summary judgment, which was based on the affirmative defense of release, and d

536 F.2d 1196 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William T. BAGLEY et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 76-1378. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 27, 1976.Decided June 28, 1976. 1 Frederic T. Spindel, Associate Gen. Counse

519 F.3d 324 (2008) Michael BIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. No. 06-3471. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 31, 2007. Decided and Filed: February 27, 2008. *325 *326 *327

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0147p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - MARK W. WILES, -

(2008) Michael STALLINGS, Petitioner, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. 5:05-CV-722. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION & ORDER KATHLEEN McDONALD O'MALLEY, District Judge. Michael Stallings petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.