Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bailey Importers Corp.”
Bailey v. Atlantic Automotive Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS MARVIN J. GARBIS, District Judge. The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [Document 21] and the materials submitted relating thereto. The Court has held a hearing and has had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. I. BACKGROUND1 In 2009, Plaint
Bailey v. Household Finance Corp. (In Re Bailey)public domain
306 B.R. 391 (2004) In re John E. BAILEY and Mary E. Bailey, Debtors. John E. Bailey and Mary E. Bailey, Plaintiffs, v. Household Finance Corp. III, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-01408, Adversary No. 03-10078. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia. February 9, 2004. *392 Evangeline Covington, Washington, DC, Cou
Bailey v. Miltope Corp.public domain
513 F.Supp.2d 1232 (2007) Patrick BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. MILTOPE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 2:05-cv-1061-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 8, 2007. *1233 *1234 Bishop Derrick Blythe, Attorney at Law, Alexander City, AL, for Plaintiff. David Woot
Sauvageau v. Baileypublic domain
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 28, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
Bailey v. United States (In re Bailey)public domain
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL F. Lee Bailey (the "Debtor") filed a notice of appeal with respect to the bankruptcy court's January 10, 2018 order (the "Order") sustaining the objection by the United States of America, Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS"), to plan confirmation to the extent the objection raised "subject matter jurisdiction and sovereign immunity issues." The basis for the IRS's objection as to those issues w
Mitchell v. Baileypublic domain
Case: 19-51123 Document: 00515689015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2020 REVISED 12/30/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
In re Baileypublic domain
Filed 3/28/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- C092799 In re LARRY BAILEY, (Super. Ct. Nos. On H
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Baileypublic domain
DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would hold a specific objection was required to the reliability of a learned treatise when the learned treatise was offered as evidence. More than a scintilla of evidence supports the jury verdict. However, because of charge error, I would hold the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Appellant challeng
Sales v. Bailey (In re Bailey)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (A.P. DKT. # 30) Jason D. Woodard, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”)(A.P. Dkt. #30), filed by Kendrick Sales, et al. (the “Creditors”) in the above-styled adversary proceeding against
Beazer Homes Corp. v. Baileypublic domain
940 So.2d 453 (2006) BEAZER HOMES CORP., Fabian Chiriboga, et al., Appellants, v. Edward BAILEY, Jill R. Bailey, et al., Appellees. No. 5D05-2229. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 8, 2006. Rehearing Denied October 27, 2006. *454 Steven L. Brannock, of Holland & Knight LLP, Tampa,
Hoffman v. Baileypublic domain
SECTION: “G”(5) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiffs Peter and Susan Hoffman (collectively “the Hoff-mans”) allege that Defendant David Bailey (“Bailey”) sent an email to the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Office in which Bailey allegedly made defamatory statements against the Hoffmans by, according to the Hoffmans, accusing
Columbia Gas v. Baileypublic domain
[Cite as Columbia Gas v. Bailey, 2023-Ohio-1245.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT/ CASE NO. 14-22-13 CROSS-APPELLEE, v. PATRICK E. BAILEY, ET AL., OPINION RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES/ CROSS-APPELLANTS. COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, INC.,
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court ArrowPointe Federal Credit Union, Respondent, v. Jimmy Eugene Bailey; Laura Jean Bailey; and U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1, Defendants, of which U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1, is the Petitioner.
In re Wayne Bailey, Inc.public domain
Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the court is the debtor's Objection to PACA Claim No. 79 filed *391by Southern Roots Farming Company, LLC on June 6, 2018, Dkt. 379 (the "Debtor's Objection"), Castellini Company, LLC's and SP Funding, LLC's Omnibus Objections to Asserted PACA Claims filed on June 4, 201
ACCEPTED 12-14-00357-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/4/2015 4:45:48 PM
Arrowpointe Federal Credit Union v. Baileypublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals ArrowPointe Federal Credit Union, Respondent, v. Jimmy Eugene Bailey; Laura Jean Bailey; and U.S. Bank National Association not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1, Defendants, Of which U.S. Bank National Association not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1 is the Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000230
Bailey v. Hensleypublic domain
By Judge Charles N. Dorsey This matter is before the Court on Thomas Hensley and Thomas Hensley, d/b/a Hensley Remodeling’s (collectively “Defendants”) Demurrer to Verdell Bailey’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint, filed on February 4,2016. Having reviewed the relevant pleadings in this case, and having considered both written and oral arguments of counsel, the Court sustains Defendants’ Demurrer for the reasons discu
Bailey v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.public domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant George Bailey seeks review of the district court’s entry of judgment on his claim of disability discrimination. Bailey’s employer defends the rationale supporting the district court’s decision and advances several alternate grounds on which it might prevail. Although our reasoning differs from that of the district court, we affirm.
Matthew Mitchell v. Orico Baileypublic domain
Case: 19-51123 Document: 00515671651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Decembe
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court ArrowPointe Federal Credit Union, Respondent, v. Jimmy Eugene Bailey; Laura Jean Bailey; and U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1, Defendants, of which U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee for WVUE 2015-1, is the Petitioner.