Cases

MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On June 20, 2013,. the parties to this consolidated action convened a conference call with the Court, in which Abbe Lowell, Esq., sought leave to file a motion to be substituted for the New York Attorney General’s office as counsel for Governor George Pataki. By order dated June 28, 2013, the Court granted Governor Pataki’s motion for substitution of couns

SACK, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether the civil commitment of the plaintiffs following the expiration of their sentences for sexually based criminal offenses constituted violations of their procedural due process rights redressable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and, if so, whether the defendants are nonetheless entitled on the record before the district court to

636 F.Supp.2d 288 (2009) Kenneth BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. George PATAKI, et al., Defendants. George Brooks, Plaintiff, v. George Pataki, et al., Defendants. Louis Massei, Plaintiff, v. George Pataki, et al., Defendants. Jorge Burgos, Jr., Plaintiff, v. George Pataki, et al., Defendants. Robert Trocchio, Plaintiff, v. George Pataki, et al., Defendants. Robert Warren, Plaintiff, v. George Pat

722 F.Supp.2d 443 (2010) Kenneth BAILEY, et al., Plaintiff, v. George PATAKI, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 8563 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 6, 2010. *444 Ameer Nadav Benno, New York County District Attorney's Office, Reza Rezvani, Rezvani Law Firm, Jeffrey Adam Rothman, Jeffrey Rothman-Attorney at

SACK, Circuit Judge: In 2005, then-New York State Governor George Pataki launched the Sexually Violent Predator Initiative (the “SVP Initiative” or the “Initiative”), which provided for the involuntary civil commitment at state psychiatric facilities of some “sexually violent predators” (“SVPs”) nearing the date of their release from incarceration or supervision. The six plaintiffs in this case were civilly committed to a ps

13‐3412 Warren v. Pataki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: June 5, 2015 Decided: May 17, 2016) Docket No. 13‐3412 1 2 3

PER CURIAM: In 2009, the Common Council of the City of Middletown, New York (“the City”), amended the City’s zoning laws to prohibit the nonconforming use of non-owner-occupied multiple dwellings in various zoning districts. The plaintiffs allege that the City’s failure to notify them, as affected property owners, prior to enacting this zoning change violated their due process r

Freedman v Goldstein (2023 NY Slip Op 04012) Freedman v Goldstein 2023 NY Slip Op 04012 Decided on July 28, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. </

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, District Judge. Presently pending before this Court is Defendants ArcelorMittal Weirton LLC (“AM Weirton”) and ArcelorMittal USA LLC’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7], filed April 11, 2014. By Order entered July 7, 2014, this Court referred a question of law to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, deferred ruling on other issues

OPINION OF THE COURT Richard L. Mott, J. Respondents in this combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and action for declaratory judgment move for summary judgment on the first cause of action1 and for dismissal of the second cause of action, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (f) and 7806. Petitioner, District Attorney of Rensselaer County, opposes. Background

Matter of Matzell v Annucci (2020 NY Slip Op 01425) Matter of Matzell v Annucci 2020 NY Slip Op 01425 Decided on February 27, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TOWNES, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Frank Perero, Noel McCarthy, Jadwiga Mills, Valin Tin, Gilbert Ramos, Felix Marte, Eric Hoang, Roosevelt Davis, Scott Nollenbergers, Anthony Di Sante, Ivan Steinberg, Paolo Prall, Andres Mor-ante, Michael Worrell, Joseph Fernandez, *279and Bess Morrison (collectively, “Plaintiffs”

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Gioconda Law Group PLLC alleges cybersquatting, trademark infringement, unlawful interception and disclosure of electronic communications, and related state law claims against Defendant Arthur Wesley Kenzie. Plaintiff has filed a partial motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Defendant’s alleged violation of the Anticy

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 192–225 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 25, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT AUGUST 4, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COUR

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT AUGUST 4, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COUR

288 S.W.3d 591 (2008) Jerry COX, Individually, and On Behalf of Family Council Action Committee, Petitioner, v. Charlie DANIELS, Secretary Of State, Respondent, John Bailey, Bill Halter and Charles Hathaway, Intervenors. No. 08-1092. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 16, 2008. *593 Martha M. Adcock, for petitioner. Ti

23-793 Carroll v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 13th day of June, two thousand twenty-five. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., MICHAEL H. PARK,

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether a district attorney enjoys qualified immunity from a complaint that he defamed a former prisoner in retaliation for seeking legislative compensation for his wrongful convictions. After Douglas Echols served seven years of imprisonment for kidnapping and rape, a test revealed that his DNA did not match the semen recovered from the victim. Echols presented this ev

OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph E. Capella, J. In this nonprimary residence holdover proceeding, the petitioner seeks, by notice of motion dated May 11, 2004, leave *462of court to engage in discovery and amend the petition to correct a typographical error.1 By notice of cross motion dated June 21, 2004, the respondents opp