Cases

755 F.Supp.2d 452 (2010) Lucinda Marie BALL, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 09-CV-40. United States District Court, W.D. New York. December 2, 2010. *454 Felice A. Brodsky, Lockport, NY, for Plaintiff. Kevin D. Robinson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Buffalo, NY, for Defendant.</

MEMORANDUM * Rebecca Kay Smith appeals the district court’s dismissal of her excessive force, due process, and free speech claims on qualified immunity grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Smith contends that defendants used excessive force in effecting her arrest by removing her food, water, and supplies, thus putting her at risk of severe dehydrati

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, concurring and dissenting I took a different view of this case in connection with the Court’s previous review. I expressed the belief that those with standing to challenge Act 13’s validity should have been required to adduce evidence supporting their contentions, to be tested through the adversarial process, before any of the law should be stric

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, the Application to Intervene to Enforce the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is DENIED. Justice STEVENS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on defendant Robinson Aviation’s (“RVA”) motion to dismiss [DE 74] and defendant Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization’s (“PATCO”) motion to dismiss [DE 78]. The matters have been fully briefed and are ripe for adjudication. A hearing on these motions was held on June 20, 2017, in Raleigh, North Carolina. For th

DISSENTING OPINION By Judge BROBSON. I join in parts I through III of the majority opinion. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion in Part IV.B and the related provisions in its order enjoining application and enforcement of Sections 3305 through 3309 of what is commonly referred to as Act 13, 58 Pa.C.S. §§ 3305-3309, in their entirety. If I read the majority’s ana

Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. As I read the Brief for Cross-Appellants (denominated by the lead opinion as “citizens,” albeit they are largely municipalities), as it pertains to their challenge to Act 13 under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the main argument is that the General Assembly has inappropriately deprived municipalities of the means to fulfill their own constitutional obligatio

ORDER PER CURIAM. Senator Joseph Scarnati, III, President Pro Tempore of the Pennsylvania State Senate, and Representative Samuel H. Smith, Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives (the “legislators”), appeal the Order of the Commonwealth Court denying their “Petition to Intervene, and for Expedited Consideration Thereof.” The Commonwealth Court held that the legislators did not hav

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2013, the Notice of Appeal is quashed. Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would note probable jurisdiction and direct expedited treatment for appeal proceedings.

PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Patrick Staudner brought suit under § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (a), alleging that his union and his former employer breached the collective bargaining agreement that governed his employment. S

*468OPINION BY President Judge PELLEGRINI.1 Before this Court are preliminary objections filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission), et al.,2 (collectively, the Commonwealth) in response to a petition for review filed

432 F.Supp.2d 434 (2006) Anthony Lewis WARE, Plaintiff, v. BALL PLASTIC CONTAINER CORP., Defendant. No. CIV.05-362-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 2, 2006. *435 Anthony Lewis Ware, Wilmington, DE, Plaintiff, Pro se. David G. Culley, Esquire and Timothy S. Martin, Esquire of Tybout, Redfearn & Pell,

Barteau, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Christopher Robinson appeals his conviction of attempted obstruction of justice. We reverse. Issue [2] Robinson presents one issue for our review, which we restate as: whether the State presented evidence sufficient to support his conviction. Facts and

The State of Florida on the relation of Frank Ball, relator, suing for himself and others similarly situated, led in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, on September 23, 1940, its petition requesting the court to issue its alternative writ of mandamus, directed to the respondents, who constitute the Board of Public Instruction of Hillsborough County, together with the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the Board of Trustees of Special Tax School District No. 53, requiring them "t

165 F.Supp.2d 230 (2001) Karen BALL and Tracy Christopher, on behalf of themselves individually, and on behalf of all other women similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SFX BROADCASTING, INC.; Liberty Broadcasting, Inc.; Michael Ferrel; and Robert Ausfeld, Individually as Aiders and Abettors, and in their Representative Capacities, Defendants. No. 00-CV-1090. United States District Court, N.D. New York.

142 P.3d 729 (2006) STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lawrence ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 32691. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2006 Term. July 31, 2006. Manweiler, Manweiler, Breen & Ball, PLLC., Boise, for appellant. James K. Ball argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Lori Fleming, Deputy Attorney G

Barnes, Judge. Vanessa Ball sued Bright Horizons Children Center, Inc. as next friend and natural mother of M. C., a minor. Ball alleged that the day care center’s teacher negligently supervised M. C.’s classroom, which proximately caused him injuries. Bright Horizons moved for summary judgment, which the trial court subsequently granted. Ball ¡appeals, and after reviewing the entire record, we affirm the trial court’s grant

This is a case contesting a will. Newell Ancil Hogan, (testator), a resident of Harris County, died on March 16, 1985. The testator left a holographic will dated June 23, 1976. On August 14, 1984, the will was admitted to probate. On January 8, 1986, appellee Ernest Knox, Independent Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate, along with the other appellees who are the putative heirs of the testator, filed an original petition for will construction alleging that provisions of the w

THOMPSON, JUDGE: David William Claude Robinson appeals from an order of the Whitley Circuit Court determining that Kentucky is an inconvenient forum to hear this child custody matter and relinquishing jurisdiction to North Carolina under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm. David and Jana Hughes Robinson married in 2

Case Number: 04-90-00267-CV 11/01/1991 Case stored in record room 10/11/1991 Errata Filed 09/30/1991 File instrument. 09/23/1991 Corrected opinion 09/19/1991 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record 09/17/1991 File instrument. 09/13/1991 File instrument. 09/12/1991 File instrument. 09/11/1991 File instrument. 09/11/1991 File instrument. 09/11/1991 Opinion issued conditionally granted 09/11/1991 Opinion issued conditionally granted 09/11/1991 Opinion issued conditionally granted 09/11/1