⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bank of America, N.A. v. Gallo”

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015-09-23 · Published · cited 1× · 539 B.R. 88; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3224
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the court in this adversary proceeding is the motion of the plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”) for summary judgment. A hearing took place in Raleigh, North Carolina on April 30, 2015. BACKGROUND Anna Silvana Gallo filed a voluntary
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 29× · 143 A.3d 638; 167 Conn. App. 347; 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 309
KELLER, J. In this residential foreclosure action, the defendants, David Aubut and Karen Aubut, 1 appeal following the trial court's judgment of strict foreclosure rendered in favor of the substitute plaintiff, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court erred in rendering summary
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-02-25 · Published · cited 16× · 927 F. Supp. 2d 15; 2013 WL 685614; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25450
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HURLEY, Senior District Judge. Bank of America, N.A. (“plaintiff’ or “Bank of America”) commenced this diversity action against Mark Fischer (“Fischer”) and Wayne Wahrsager (“Wahrsager”) (collectively, the “defendants”) for breaching their guaranties in connection with a $17.5 million loan to New York Merchants Protective Co., Inc. (“NYMP”), a company owned and controlled by t
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-12-01 · Published · cited 2× · 754 F. Supp. 2d 500; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126429; 2010 WL 4872992
754 F.Supp.2d 500 (2010) Deborah HIRSCHBERG, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. No. 08 CV 1611(DRH)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 1, 2010. *501 Gabor & Gabor, by David George Gabor, Esq., Hope Senzer Gabor, Esq., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff. Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodg
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-09-03 · Published · cited 8× · 969 F. Supp. 2d 339; 2013 WL 4734495; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125700
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This cases arises from a transaction between Plaintiffs Bank of America and Banc of America Securities LLC (“BAS”) (collectively “BOA”), and Defendant Bear Stearns Asset Management (“BSAM”) in May of 2007. The transaction led to the creation of a “CDO-squared” — that is, a Collateralized Debt Obligation (“CDO”) comprised of CDOs known as “the Issuer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 139 N.Y.S.3d 895; 192 A.D.3d 652; 2021 NY Slip Op 01242
Bank of Am., N.A. v Sofer (2021 NY Slip Op 01242) Bank of Am., N.A. v Sofer 2021 NY Slip Op 01242 Decided on March 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-14 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 00811
Ellis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (2023 NY Slip Op 00811) Ellis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. 2023 NY Slip Op 00811 Decided on February 14, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-14 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 00811
Ellis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (2023 NY Slip Op 00811) Ellis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. 2023 NY Slip Op 00811 Decided on February 14, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2021-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 145 N.Y.S.3d 278; 71 Misc. 3d 15; 2021 NY Slip Op 21064
People v Bank of Am., N.A. (2021 NY Slip Op 21064) People v Bank of Am., N.A. 2021 NY Slip Op 21064 [71 Misc 3d 15] Accepted for Miscellaneous Reports Publication Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Published by New York State Law Report
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-12-27 · Published · cited 9× · 946 F.3d 533
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NORMAN SHAW, No. 17-56706 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-01207- DMS-BLM BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; U.S. BANK, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-02-12 · Published · cited 9× · 689 F. Supp. 2d 390; 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 107; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12289; 2010 WL 550235
689 F.Supp.2d 390 (2010) Christiane McCOWAN, Plaintiff, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., Defendant. No. 07-CV-3245 (JFB)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 12, 2010. *393 Neil Frank, Pamela Jae Naples, and Peter Arcadia Romero of Frank & Associates, P.C., Farmingdale, NY, for Plaintiff. James R. Grasso
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 153 F. Supp. 3d 830
*835MEMORANDUM ORDER Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge William Weiss, Robert Lessman, Ann Harrell and Eddie Harrell (“Plaintiffs”) assert class action, claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, as well as claims for unjust enrichment, alleging that Defendants engaged in a conspira
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
MASHANNA GALLO * NO. 2021-CA-0313 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL GREENPATH * INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM FIRST CITY CO
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-12-11 · Published · cited 22× · 908 F. Supp. 2d 498; 2012 WL 6135630; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175746
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiff John Delaney brings suit against Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America Merrill Lynch f/k/a Banc of America Securities, LLC (collectively, “Bank of America” or “BoA”), alleging that BoA (1) violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, by terminating him; and (2) breached an oral agree
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004-03-29 · Published · cited 7× · 307 B.R. 906; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5184; 2004 WL 626700
307 B.R. 906 (2004) John BLAIR, et al., Appellants, v. BANK ONE, N.A., Appellee. Comdisco, et al., Appellants, v. Bank One, N.A., Appellee. Civ. No. 03 C 3095, 03 C 6948 and 03 C 8914. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2004. *907 *908 Champ W.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 NY Slip Op 01102
Darwish Auto Group, LLC v TD Bank, N.A. (2026 NY Slip Op 01102) Darwish Auto Group, LLC v TD Bank, N.A. 2026 NY Slip Op 01102 Decided on February 26, 2026 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012-12-31 · Published · cited 7× · 916 F. Supp. 2d 537; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188905; 2012 WL 6761876
OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation’s motion [Doc. No. 20] to dismiss *540Plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court has considered the parties’ submissions 1 and decides this matter pursuant to
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-10-17 · Published · cited 29× · 84 F.4th 507
21-2919-cv Eisenhauer v. Culinary Institute of America 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 6 7 AUGUST TERM 2022 8 9 No. 21-2919-cv 10 11 ANITA EISENHAUER, 12 Plaintiff-Appellant, 13 14
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-10-29 · Published · cited 27× · 395 F. Supp. 2d 5; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25708; 2005 WL 2838125
395 F.Supp.2d 5 (2005) CITIBANK, N.A., Plaintiffs, v. Lidia SWIATKOSKI, Michael Swiatkowski, Betina Swiatkowski, American Express Travel Related Services Co. Inc., American Express Centurion Bank, Susan Bailey, and John Doe and/or Jane Doe # 1-10 Inclusive. No. 05-CV-4679(ADS)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 29, 2005.