⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Bank of America, N.A. v. Steinbock”

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975-09-29 · Published · cited 6× · 401 F. Supp. 19; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963
401 F.Supp. 19 (1975) Robert STEINBOCK-SINCLAIR, Plaintiff, v. AMOCO INTERNATIONAL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 71 C 2828. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. September 29, 1975. *20 *21 Anna R. Lavin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. William D. Maddu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01717
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013-01-22 · Published · cited 10× · 918 F. Supp. 2d 1108; 2013 WL 228189; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9199
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS O. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59). These motions were heard with oral argument on January 10, 2013. Plaintiff was represented by Patrick J. Kirby. Defendants were represented by James M. Kalamon. The Court has reviewed the br
State v. Courchesnepublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010-06-15 · Published · cited 86× · 998 A.2d 1; 296 Conn. 622; 2010 Conn. LEXIS 227
Opinion PALMER, J. At approximately 11 p.m. on September 15, 1998, the defendant, Robert Courchesne, and an *627acquaintance, Demetris Rodgers, were seated in the defendant’s car in the parking lot of Webster Bank located on the comer of Chase and Wigwam Avenues in Waterbury, arguing over a drug d
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987-07-21 · Published · cited 11× · 667 F. Supp. 833; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7448
667 F.Supp. 833 (1987) Perfecto BARRANTES CABALCETA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 87-0457-Civ. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 21, 1987. *834 Charles S. Siegel, Baron & Budd, Dallas, Tex., Louis S. Robles, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs. James E. Wilber, Bond, Sho
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-09-28 · Published · cited 201× · 883 F.2d 1553; 1989 WL 104105
FITZPATRICK, District Judge: This case presents a number of unique jurisdictional questions, one of first impression regarding the statutory interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c), and one involving fraudulent joinder. Because of their colorful and necessary history, we will first look at not only the procedural background of this case but the legal progression of several suits which have been filed against various combinat
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-09-28 · Published · cited 159× · 883 F.2d 1553; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14416
883 F.2d 1553 Perfecto Barrantes CABALCETA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,Cross-Appellees,v.STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY, Standard Fruit & Steamship Company,Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Castle & Cooke, Inc.,the Dow Chemical Company and Shell OilCompany, Defendants-Appellees,Cross-Appellants. No. 87-5709. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.
Hastings v. Matlockpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1985-08-28 · Published · cited 31× · 171 Cal. App. 3d 826; 217 Cal. Rptr. 856; 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2456
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 828 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 829 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY
District Court, S.D. New York · 1983-01-26 · Published · cited 21× · 559 F. Supp. 961; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19776
559 F.Supp. 961 (1983) Richard L. BUNCH, Plaintiff, v. ARTEC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Dictaphone Corporation and Pitney Bowes Inc., Defendants. WORD SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARTEC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, formerly a California Corporation, Dictaphone Corporation (Del.), a Delaware Corporation, Pitney Bowes Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Nos. 82 Civ. 2211(JMC), 81 Civ. 7439(JMC).
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978-12-22 · Published · cited 2× · 80 F.R.D. 730; 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7048
BLUMENFELD, District Judge. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS This is a shareholder’s derivative suit, brought by a single shareholder of United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Canso”), a Canadian corporation. He is suing several of the directors of Canso, John W. Buckley, Priscilla L. Buckley, Benjamin W. Heath, and Albert H. Barton (hereinafter referred to as the “individual defendants”),
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989-07-12 · Published · cited 28× · 778 P.2d 59; 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 74; 1989 Wyo. LEXIS 174; 1989 WL 76416
URBIGKIT, Justice, specially concurring and dissenting. I. STATUS OF CASE ON APPEAL Following adverse summary judgment on a scraper driver’s lawsuit claiming serious physical injuries caused by improperly performing equipment tires, this court considers his dismissed claims asserting liability for: 1. negligent manufacture and design of
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982-09-07 · Published · cited 77× · 685 F.2d 184
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge. In 1979 and 1980 William J. Phillips, a successful black businessman, was looking for a new house. He found what he wanted in the Hunter Trails subdivision of Oak Brook, Illinois — a 12,000 square-foot, trilevel home on a large lot. He offered $675,-000 for it, and his offer was accepted by the owner, Dennis