Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Bank of America, N.A. v. Steinbock”
Steinbock-Sinclair v. Amoco International Oil Co.public domain
401 F.Supp. 19 (1975) Robert STEINBOCK-SINCLAIR, Plaintiff, v. AMOCO INTERNATIONAL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 71 C 2828. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. September 29, 1975. *20 *21 Anna R. Lavin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. William D. Maddu
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Hotchkiss v. CSK Auto Inc.public domain
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS O. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59). These motions were heard with oral argument on January 10, 2013. Plaintiff was represented by Patrick J. Kirby. Defendants were represented by James M. Kalamon. The Court has reviewed the br
State v. Courchesnepublic domain
Opinion PALMER, J. At approximately 11 p.m. on September 15, 1998, the defendant, Robert Courchesne, and an *627acquaintance, Demetris Rodgers, were seated in the defendant’s car in the parking lot of Webster Bank located on the comer of Chase and Wigwam Avenues in Waterbury, arguing over a drug d
Barrantes Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.public domain
667 F.Supp. 833 (1987) Perfecto BARRANTES CABALCETA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 87-0457-Civ. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 21, 1987. *834 Charles S. Siegel, Baron & Budd, Dallas, Tex., Louis S. Robles, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs. James E. Wilber, Bond, Sho
Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.public domain
FITZPATRICK, District Judge: This case presents a number of unique jurisdictional questions, one of first impression regarding the statutory interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c), and one involving fraudulent joinder. Because of their colorful and necessary history, we will first look at not only the procedural background of this case but the legal progression of several suits which have been filed against various combinat
Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Companypublic domain
883 F.2d 1553 Perfecto Barrantes CABALCETA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,Cross-Appellees,v.STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY, Standard Fruit & Steamship Company,Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Castle & Cooke, Inc.,the Dow Chemical Company and Shell OilCompany, Defendants-Appellees,Cross-Appellants. No. 87-5709. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.
Hastings v. Matlockpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 828 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 829 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY
Bunch v. Artec International Corp.public domain
559 F.Supp. 961 (1983) Richard L. BUNCH, Plaintiff, v. ARTEC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Dictaphone Corporation and Pitney Bowes Inc., Defendants. WORD SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARTEC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, formerly a California Corporation, Dictaphone Corporation (Del.), a Delaware Corporation, Pitney Bowes Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Nos. 82 Civ. 2211(JMC), 81 Civ. 7439(JMC).
Messinger v. United Canso Oil & Gas Ltd.public domain
BLUMENFELD, District Judge. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS This is a shareholder’s derivative suit, brought by a single shareholder of United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Canso”), a Canadian corporation. He is suing several of the directors of Canso, John W. Buckley, Priscilla L. Buckley, Benjamin W. Heath, and Albert H. Barton (hereinafter referred to as the “individual defendants”),
McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.public domain
URBIGKIT, Justice, specially concurring and dissenting. I. STATUS OF CASE ON APPEAL Following adverse summary judgment on a scraper driver’s lawsuit claiming serious physical injuries caused by improperly performing equipment tires, this court considers his dismissed claims asserting liability for: 1. negligent manufacture and design of
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge. In 1979 and 1980 William J. Phillips, a successful black businessman, was looking for a new house. He found what he wanted in the Hunter Trails subdivision of Oak Brook, Illinois — a 12,000 square-foot, trilevel home on a large lot. He offered $675,-000 for it, and his offer was accepted by the owner, Dennis