Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Banta v. Ferguson”
Banta v. Statepublic domain
651 S.E.2d 21 (2007) BANTA v. The STATE. No. S07A0705. Supreme Court of Georgia. September 24, 2007. *23 Michael A. Corbin, Dalton, for Appellant. Kermit Neal McManus, Dist. Atty., Dalton, Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Paula Khristian Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, for Appellee. HINES, Justice
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-17-00107-CV BANTA OILFIELD SERVICES, INC., Appellant V. MEWBOURNE OIL COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 114th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-0719-C/B Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Opinion by Justice Moseley
Gordon C. Knapp v. J. W. Banta, Burton Banta, Frank Banta and Plaquemine Towing Corporationpublic domain
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. This is a tort action removed because of diversity to the district court. Plaintiff Gordon C. Knapp, a labor organizer for the National Maritime Union, sought to recover damages from defendants J. W. Banta, Burton Banta, Frank Banta, and Plaquemine Towing Corporation for alleged assault, conspiracy to assault
Henegar v. Bantapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. POTTER, Senior District Judge: This cause is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs opposition. A former brakeman with Norfolk and Western Railway Company, plaintiff was allegedly defamed by his supervisor who claimed that Mr. Henegar gave false and conflicting statements regarding an injury that occurred on February 4, 1991.
Stewart v. Fergusonpublic domain
Rumsey, J.: This case has been twice heard upon appeal and is reported in 34 Appellate Division, 515, and 44 Appellate Division, 58. We see no reason to change the rules laid down in those opinions, especially as our interpretation of the statute has been adopted by the second department in the case of McAllister v. Ferguson (50 App. Div. 529), where the liability of this defendant was in question for an inju
Ferguson v. Glassfordpublic domain
Champlin, J. In this case it is conceded that the written ■discharge of the mortgage bearing date the sixth day of January, 1879, executed by. Archibald Maxwell and Ann Maxwell to John Allen, was placed upon record by mistake. The defendant George Glassford purchased the land from Maxwell on March 10, 1883, and the only question is whether he had .-actual notice that the mortgage was an existing incumbrance ■notwithstanding the re
Stewart v. . Fergusonpublic domain
The only question of law presented for our review by the exceptions arises upon the refusal of the trial court to charge as requested by the defendant. There was evidence tending to show how the scaffold was constructed, but not tending to show any particular structural weakness. There was no evidence tending to prove the cause of the fall of the scaffold other than the fall itself. The trial court instructed the jury that the falling of the scaffold raised a presumption of the negligence of
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'npublic domain
Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge: Hoopa Valley Tribe ("Hoopa") petitions for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") orders, which found (1) that California and Oregon had not waived their water quality certification authority under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act ("CWA") and (2) that PacifiCorp had diligently prosecuted its relicensing application for the Klamath Hyd
Canning v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. *78 SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge: Noel Canning petitions for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board, which determined that the petitioner violated the National Labor Relations Act and orde
Michael Boucher v. Warrior Crane Service, LLCpublic domain
Opinion filed September 19, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00174-CV __________ MICHAEL BOUCHER, Appellant V. WARRIOR CRANE SERVICE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from
Krein v. Szewc (In re Szewc)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS M. RENN, Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiffs brought the present adversary proceeding to except a state court judgment from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a)(4).1 The proceeding was tried and post-trial briefing is complete. The matter is ripe for decision. Procedural Background: On February 3, 2012, Plaintiffs filed sui
Bostic v. Statepublic domain
672 S.E.2d 630 (2009) BOSTIC v. The STATE. No. S09A0175. Supreme Court of Georgia. January 26, 2009. *631 Jennifer R. Burns, Savannah, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., Dist. Atty., Gregory M. McConnell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Sheila E. Gallow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. BENHAM, Jus
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
Marvin Keith Bennett v. Doris Varner Bennettpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00305-CV ________________ MARVIN KEITH BENNETT, Appellant v. DORIS VARNER BENNETT, Appellee ____________________________________________________
Christina McDaniel v. Statepublic domain
FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS
David Hager v. Todd G. Rowanpublic domain
WIENER, Circuit Judge: After Plaintiff-Appellant David Hager was fired by Defendant-Appellee DBG Partners, Inc ("DBG"), he obtained continuation coverage under DBG's ERISA health care plan through the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Recovery Act ("COBRA"). Hager later filed this suit, alleging that DBG had discontinued its health plan without notifying him, violating COBRA's notice requirem
State v. Culppublic domain
17 So.3d 429 (2009) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Bradley K. CULP, Appellant. No. 44,270-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. July 15, 2009. *432 Edward K. Bauman, Lake Charles, for Appellant. Richard C. Nevils, District Attorney, Steven D. Crews, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellee. Before WIL
Rolling Oaks Mall LLC v. Bexar Appraisal Districtpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00241-CV ROLLING OAKS MALL LLC, Appellant v. BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee
Howard v. Coventry Health Carepublic domain
293 F.3d 442 Lisa HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COVENTRY HEALTH CARE, OF IOWA, INC.; Principal Financial Group, Inc.; Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company, also known as Principal Life Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-3067. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 18, 2002. Filed: June 7, 2002.
Howard v. Coventry Health Care, of Iowa, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. Lisa Howard filed suit in Iowa District Court for Polk County against Coventry Health Care of Iowa, Inc.; Principal Financial Group, Inc.; and Principal Mutual a/k/a Principal Life Insurance Company for tortious breach of statute in violation of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (“WHCRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1185b. She also filed pendent state claims of breach of con