Cases

163 Cal.App.4th 161 (2008) PAUL DYER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant and Appellant. No. C054971. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. May 22, 2008. *164 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Jacob A. Appelsmith, Assistant Attorney General, Vincent J. Scally, Jr., and Barbara A. M

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1508 Doc: 49 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 15 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1508 DUSTIN WALLACE DYER, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SHIRRELLIA SMITH; NATALIE STATON,

750 F.Supp. 1278 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Randall K. DYER, et al. Crim. No. 90-00183-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 30, 1990. *1279 *1280 Henry E. Hudson, U.S. Atty., Lawrence J. Leiser, Quincy L. Ollison, Asst. U.S. Attys., Geoffrey R. B

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING This is a case of first impression in Texas. The issue is whether the beneficiary of a will can effectively disclaim her inheritance pursuant to § 37A of the Texas Probate Code although disclaiming would defeat the rights of a judgment creditor. Appellant, Roland Edward Dyer, alleges that appellees conspired to defraud him of the ability to satisfy a default judgment of $1.08 million rendered against ap

12/16/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 17, 2020 Session RYAN KIMBLE v. DYER COUNTY TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dyer County No. 2019-CV-36 R. Lee Moore, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

02/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs in Knoxville November 28, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BARBARA PINNIX Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County No. 9823HV.4 Thomas W. Graham, Judge No. M2017-00822-CCA-R

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Billie J. Roe, now Billie Chisman, has spent a number of years trying to secure long-term disability benefits under an insurance policy she briefly held from the Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company (MCIC). In the first appeal in this case, Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roe, 93 F.3d 323 (7th Cir.1996), we affirmed

VACCHELLI, J. This case is an action to collect a debt due on a promissory note made in connection with the sale of a real estate agent’s business. The plaintiff, Patricia Harrington, alleges that she sold her real estate business to the defendant, Kathy A. Dyer, that Dyer executed a promissory note in payment and that Dyer is in default on the note. Harrington has made an application for a prejudgment remedy seeking to garnish 2

COFFIN, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Bryan A. Dyer, appeals dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dyer, who was convicted by a Massachusetts state court on four counts of murder, as well as for armed robbery and the unlawful carrying of a firearm, claims that his constitutional right to due process was violated during

NUMBERS 13-20-00341-CV & 13-20-00383-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MEGALOMEDIA, INC., Appellant, v. MAJA RADNOVIC, JEANNE COVEY, BARBARA J. FALLAW, DOROTHY “DOTTIE” PERKINS, ANNJEANETTE WHALEY, ALICIA KIRGAN, AND MATTHEW VENTRESS AKA DESTINEE LASHAEE,

Sanders, J. ¶52 (dissenting) — In In re Personal Restraint of Dyer, 157 Wn.2d 358, 139 P.3d 320 (2006), we reversed the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board’s (ISRB) 2002 denial of parole because “a review of the evidence and testimony presented at the parolability hearing suggests Dyer met his burden to have conditions of release on parole established . . . .” Id. at 369. On remand the ISRB was ordered t

610 N.W.2d 282 (2000) 240 Mich. App. 216 DOMINION RESERVES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY and MichCon Gathering Company, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 216331. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted February 1, 2000, at Grand Rapids. Decided March 10, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Released for P

Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge PAYNE joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge. Barbara Taylor sued Progress Energy, Inc. (Progress), the parent company of her former employer, Carolina Power & Light Company (CP & L), alle

189 P.3d 759 (2008) In the Matter of the PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF Richard J. DYER, Petitioner. No. 79872-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued November 27, 2007. Decided August 7, 2008. *762 David Zuckerman, Seattle, for Petitioner. Gregory Joseph Rosen, Attorney General's Office, Criminal Justice Division,

794 So.2d 1 (2001) STATE of Louisiana v. Austin DYER. No. 00-KA-1866. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. April 24, 2001. *4 Holli Herrle-Castillo, Louisiana Appellate Project, Marrero, LA, Attorney for Defendant/Appellant, Austin Dyer. Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Thomas J. Butler, Terry M. Boudreaux,

PER CURIAM: The opinion in the above case dated October 10, 1990, and reported at 913 F.2d 1538, is amended by deleting the final sentence of the CONCLUSION and the accompanying citations.

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Walnut Creek Nursery, Inc., d/b/a Alsip Home & Nursery (“Alsip”), appeals from a jury’s verdict in favor of Barbara Banske, in a negligence action brought by Banske. Alsip contends that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing a naprapath, who was licensed as such in Illinois, to testif

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 1, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BARBARA ANN BRYANT a/k/a BARBARA ANN FAYNE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 4713 Joseph H. Walker, Judge No. W2004-01245-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 1, 2005 The defendant, Barbara Ann Bryant, a

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Universal Life Insurance Company from a judgment for Brachett in the amount of $16,000, representing proceeds of insurance on the life of her husband. Universal argues that res judicata bars this suit. We agree and reverse.

Appellee Teaundra Lasha Oages was charged by information with possession of less than two ounces of marijuana. Appellee filed a pretrial motion to suppress, and the trial court granted the motion. The trial court did not issue findings of fact and conclusions of law, although they were requested by the State. The State appealed the trial court's order to suppress to the evidence. In a published opinion, the Eastland Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's ruling. State v. Oage