Cases

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Kevin Seafler, Roy A. Smyth, Carol K. Smyth, FILED Thomas A. Mooney, Dorothy Ann Mooney, November 22, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Judith B. Douglas, Patsy Pauley, SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Plaintif

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

Matter of Joseph O. v Danielle B. (2018 NY Slip Op 01192) Matter of Joseph O. v Danielle B. 2018 NY Slip Op 01192 Decided on February 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Report

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶1 Brian Steffensen appeals the judgment of the district court disbarring him from practicing law for violations of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct involving, inter alia , failure to file taxes. Mr. Steffensen asks this court to reverse the district court's finding

PUBLISHED Filed: May 14, 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS  COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN F. SAGE; LINDA K. SAGE, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 03-1708 (CA-02-107-4) and 1.20 ACRES IN WYTHE C

*43 BALMER, C. J. This case requires us to consider whether a private citizen’s seizure of criminal evidence was subject to suppression at trial as the fruit of an unlawful government search. Defendant came to the attention of law enforcement after his housekeeper anonymously called the child protective serv

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2020 WY 73 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2020 June 11, 2020 BRADLEY ROSS FAIRBOURN, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-18-0259, S-19-0217 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appe

58 P.3d 1229 (2002) 100 Hawai`i 182 CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation of the State of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. James Douglas keauhou ING, Robert Kalani Uichi Kihune, Constance Hee Lau, Diane Joyce Plotts, and Charles Nainoa Thompson as Trustees under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and Catherin

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS  COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN F. SAGE; LINDA K. SAGE, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 03-1708 and 1.20 ACRES IN WYTHE COUNTY, VIRGINIA; MARY CASEL, Commissioner of Revenue; JOHN DOE, et al.; UNKNOWN OWNERS, Defend

362 B.R. 624 (2007) In re BAYOU GROUP, LLC, et al., Debtors. Bayou Superfund, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WAM Long/Short Fund II, L.P. f/k/a WAM Long/Short Fund, L.P., Defendant. [94 additional adversary proceeding captions annexed as Schedule A]. Bankruptcy No. 06 B 22306(ASH), Adversary No. 06-08293A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 23, 2007. <

DECISION DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS ADLAI S. HARDIN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaints in ninety-five adversary proceedings pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 7009 and 7012 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). The adversary proceedings were commenced by debtors-plaintiffs to recover alleged fraudulent conveyances under

133 S.E.2d 492 (1963) 260 N.C. 619 Barbara Jean FARMER, Minor, by her Next Friend, W. H. Farmer, Sr. v. Nelson FERRIS, Ruth Ferris, Carl D. Ferris and King Amusement Company, Inc. No. 162. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 11, 1963. Carter, Murchison, Fox & Newton, by James C. Fox, Wilmington, for King Amusement Co., Inc., defenda

832 F.Supp. 1378 (1993) PARFUMS GIVENCHY, INC., Plaintiff, v. C & C BEAUTY SALES, INC., Defendant. No. CV 92-7455 MRP. United States District Court, C.D. California. September 1, 1993. *1379 *1380 *1381 Ronald L. Olson, Lawrence C. Barth, Munger, Tolles

530 F.Supp. 949 (1981) BUITONI FOODS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GIO. BUTON & C. S.p.A., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79 C 2780. United States District Court, E. D. New York. November 3, 1981. *950 *951 Guy W. Shoup, Eliot S. Gerber, Barbara A. Larsen, Wyatt, Gerber, Shoup, Scobey & Badie, Ne

675 F.Supp.2d 540 (2009) ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, et al., Plaintiffs v. BEECH RIDGE ENERGY LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. RWT 09cv1519. United States District Court, D. Maryland. December 8, 2009. *541 William K. Meyer, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Baltimore, MD, Eric R. Glitzenstein, Meyer Glitzenstein and Crystal, Washington, DC,

BEN C. DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge. This cause duly came on for trial on the pleadings and the Order for Separate Trial of Claims under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. entered by the Court herein on April 24, 1959, and the Court, having heard the evidence and considered the stipulation of the parties, and having considered carefully the extensive briefs and oral arguments, finds the facts and st

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: The Natural Gas Act (NGA or the Act), 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h), gives a gas company the power to acquire property by eminent domain, but the Act does not provide for immediate possession, that is, possession before just compensation is dete

Hammond, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Barnes, J., dissented and filed a dissenting opinion. (See p. 486 infra.) The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, proceeding under Code (1966 Repl. Vol.), Art. 26, §§ 51 through 71, “Juvenile Causes,” and particularly § 52 (f) “Neglected child,” 1 found various young il

On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Appellants filed petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The Panel voted to deny rehearing. A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Judge Widener voted to rehear the case en banc, and Judges Niemeyer, Lu

Opinion TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. FACTS.......................301 II. SEARCH AND SEIZURE ISSUES.......306 A. The December 21, 1989 Warrantless Search of the Defendant’s Apartment. . . 314 B. The December 21,1989 Warrant to Search the Defendant’s Apartment.........316