⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Barbara Schultz”

State v. Schultzpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 120 So. 3d 222; 2013 WL 4525439; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13671
GERBER, J. The state appeals from the circuit court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss six trafficking in oxycodone charges under section 893.135(l)(c)l.c., Florida Statutes (2009). The state argues the court erred in finding that the state was limited to charging the defendant, a medical doctor, with illicit conduct by a prescribing practitioner under section 893.13(8), Florida Statutes (2009). We agree with
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-02-09 · Published · cited 4× · 594 F.3d 1120; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2672; 2010 WL 431772
594 F.3d 1120 (2010) Richard D. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Creditor-Appellee, Thomas K. Bourke, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant, and Judgment Resolution Corporation; Leslie H. Combs, II, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-17304. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 11, 2009. Filed February 9
Illinois Supreme Court · 2010-03-18 · Published · cited 126× · 930 N.E.2d 943; 237 Ill. 2d 391; 341 Ill. Dec. 429; 2010 Ill. LEXIS 284
930 N.E.2d 943 (2010) 237 Ill.2d 391 Kenneth W. SCHULTZ, Appellee, v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Barbara Weglarz et al., Appellees. No. 108038. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 18, 2010. *945 Danny L. Worker, Zacarias R. Chac
State v. Schultzpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 16× · 676 N.W.2d 337; 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 304; 2004 WL 614664
676 N.W.2d 337 (2004) STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Stephen Matthew SCHULTZ, Respondent. No. A03-1240. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 30, 2004. *339 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Peter A. MacMillan, Michele R. Wallace, MacMillan & Wallace, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant. Leonardo Castr
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009-01-08 · Published · cited 5× · 901 N.E.2d 957; 387 Ill. App. 3d 622; 327 Ill. Dec. 224; 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 5
901 N.E.2d 957 (2009) Kenneth W. SCHULTZ, Executor of the Estate of Patricia Smetana, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (Kathleen O'Conner, Plaintiff). Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara Weglarz, Krzysztof Majchrowicz and Jolanta Majchrowicz, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 1-08-0458, 1-08-0583. Appellate Co
Schultz v. Trascherpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001-10-02 · Published · cited 14× · 2002 WI App 4; 640 N.W.2d 130; 249 Wis. 2d 722; 2001 Wisc. App. LEXIS 996
FINE, J. ¶ 32. (dissenting). The Majority correctly concludes that the trial court attempted to invoke its equitable powers to remedy a situation that it observed personally when, without objection by any of the parties, it determined that it could not maneuver into Suzanne Schultz's garage. Normally, that would *741end the matter, because whether to impose an equitable rem
Schultz v. Hillpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003-09-05 · Published · cited 0× · 852 So. 2d 1043; 2003 La. LEXIS 2400; 2003 WL 22096491
*1044In re Schultz, James H.;—Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 448,851; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 0835. Denied.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 513 F. Supp. 2d 1023; 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1539; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69169; 2007 WL 2713641
513 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2007) Mary SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY, Defendant. No. 06-C-706-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. September 18, 2007. *1024 *1025 Thomas R. Crone, Melli, Walker, Pease & Ruhly, S.C., Madison, WI, for Defe
Schultz v. Natwickpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002-11-19 · Published · cited 61× · 2002 WI 125; 653 N.W.2d 266; 257 Wis. 2d 19; 2002 Wisc. LEXIS 1063
257 Wis.2d 19 (2002) 2002 WI 125 653 N.W.2d 266 Barbara A. SCHULTZ, individually and as Special Administrator for the Estate of Lindsey Schultz, and Roger Schultz, individually, Mitchell Schultz, individually, Russell Schultz, individually, and 3M Medical Plan, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Roger D. NATWICK, M.D., ORCC, Inc., f/k/a Red Cedar Clinic, S.C., d/b/a Red Cedar Clinic, Red Cedar C
Schultz v. Natwickpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001-11-21 · Published · cited 1× · 2001 WI App 281; 638 N.W.2d 319; 249 Wis. 2d 317; 2001 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1181
249 Wis.2d 317 (2001) 2001 WI App 281 638 N.W.2d 319 Barbara A. SCHULTZ, individually and as Special Administrator for the Estate of Lindsey Schultz, and Roger Schultz, individually, Mitchell Schultz, individually, Russell Schultz, individually, and 3M Medical Plan, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[†] v. Roger D. NATWICK, M.D., ORCC, Inc., f/k/a Red Cedar Clinic, S.C., d/b/a Red Cedar Clinic, Red
Gancas v. Schultzpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996-08-20 · Published · cited 19× · 683 A.2d 1207; 453 Pa. Super. 324; 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2537
453 Pa. Superior Ct. 324 (1996) 683 A.2d 1207 Robert A. GANCAS v. Barbara G. SCHULTZ, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 21, 1996. Filed August 20, 1996. *327 David S. Pollock, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Karen L. Ferri, Murrysville, for appellee. Before McEWEN, President
Clements v. Schultzpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994-05-27 · Published · cited 13× · 200 A.D.2d 11; 612 N.Y.S.2d 726; 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6838
OPINION OF THE COURT Davis, J. The principal issue presented on this appeal is whether plaintiff’s deed created an easement that is enforceable against defendants. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiff’s deed created an easement but that the facts necessary to decide whether it is enforceable against defendants are not ascertainable from this record. Further, we are asked to determine wheth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 4× · 184 A.3d 168
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: Suzette Schultz ("Wife") appeals from the decree in divorce entered on March 8, 2017, in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, related to the dissolution of her marriage to Ronald Schultz ("Husband"). The trial court entered the final decree following an order resolving the parties' economic claims, as well as an order denying Wife's outstanding petit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989-07-26 · Published · cited 28× · 872 F.2d 676
872 F.2d 676 Barbara and Christopher SCHULTZ, Individually and on Behalfof Their Minor Daughter, Rachel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants,Hart Schaffner & Marx, (Hartmarx Corporation), Defendant-Appellee.andBarbara SCHULTZ/Christopher Schultz, Individually and onBehalf of Their Minor Daughter, Rachel Schultz,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.HART SCHAFFNER & MARX S
Cornwell v. Schultzpublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THOMAS L. CORNWELL, A NEVADA No. 82106 RESIDENT, Appellant, vs. FILED NEIL E. SCHULTZ, A NEVADA RESIDENT, A/K/A THE NEIL E. MAR 3 O 2022 SCHULTZ TRUST DATED JANUARY ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK CIF SUPREME COURT 29, 2016,
Oliver v. Schultzpublic domain
Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994-10-27 · Published · cited 22× · 885 S.W.2d 699; 1994 Ky. LEXIS 109; 1994 WL 587831
STUMBO, Justice. Patty Oliver appeals a judgment of the Meade Circuit Court upholding the validity of a restrictive covenant forbidding the placement of a mobile home upon her property. After reviewing the record and the law, we reverse. A brief summary of the facts is in order. On March 14, 1990, Oliver purchased two tracts of land from Rosalie Waters. One tract contained 4.77 acres of land; the other co
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 IL App (4th) 230366
FILED April 5, 2024 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate 2024 IL App (4th) 230366 Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-04-05 · Published · cited 2× · 2024 IL App (4th) 230366
FILED April 5, 2024 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate 2024 IL App (4th) 230366 Court, IL
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990-01-29 · Published · cited 12× · 729 F. Supp. 609; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1135
729 F.Supp. 609 (1990) John SCHULTZ and Joann Schultz, Plaintiffs, v. KEENE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 86 C 5431. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. January 29, 1990. *610 Terrence M. Johnson, Chicago, Ill., for John Schultz and Joann Schultz. Daniel J. Cheely, Paul B. O'Flaherty, Jr., John A. Kriv
New York Court of Appeals · 1997-06-10 · Published · cited 43× · 683 N.E.2d 307; 90 N.Y.2d 311; 660 N.Y.S.2d 685; 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1364
90 N.Y.2d 311 (1997) 683 N.E.2d 307 660 N.Y.S.2d 685 Robert Schultz, Respondent, v. Harrison Radiator Division General Motors Corporation, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 29, 1997 Decided June 10, 1997. Herzfeld & Rubin, P. C., New York City (Herbert