Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Barcoding, Inc. v. Genet”
Natera, Inc. v. Neogenomics Laboratories, Inc.public domain
Case: 24-1324 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 07/12/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. NEOGENOMICS LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1324, 2024-1409 ______________________ Appeals from the United State
Natera, Inc. v. Neogenomics Laboratories, Inc.public domain
Case: 24-1324 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 07/12/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. NEOGENOMICS LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1324, 2024-1409 ______________________ Appeals from the United State
Return Mail, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-130C (Filed: April 6, 2022) ) Patent infringement case; persuasive, but RETURN MAIL, INC., ) not precedential, effect of prior decision ) of the Federal Circuit that was reversed by Plaintiff,
Bridge & Post, Inc. v. Verizon Commc'ns, Inc.public domain
John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge This case involves technology that helps businesses pry into peoples' personal preferences and privacy. Advertisers use targeted marketing techniques to place advertisements in places likely to reach interested consumers. For example, advertisers for pizza buy commercials during football games and advertisers for diapers buy ads in parenting magazines. This time-tested technique has
Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 20-2044 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. APPLE INC., VISA INC., VISA U.S.A. INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2020-2044 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Secured Mail Solutions LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc.public domain
•REYNA, Circuit Judge. Secured Mail Solutions LLC appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California’s grant of a motion to dismiss on grounds that the claims of seven asserted patents are directed to'subject matter ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Because the claims of the asserted patents are directed to an
James K. Bredar, Chief Judge In this employment discrimination case, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission *510("EEOC") brought claims against co-Defendants Phase 2 Investments, Inc. ("Phase 2") and CWP West Corp. d/b/a/ Mister Carwash ("Mister") alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in regard to the operation
Matter of Common Cause N.Y. v. Kosinskipublic domain
Matter of Common Cause N.Y. v Kosinski (2025 NY Slip Op 04690) Matter of Common Cause N.Y. v Kosinski 2025 NY Slip Op 04690 Decided on August 14, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Case: 23-2350 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 08/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LABCORP GENETICS, INC., THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION, DBA MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. QIAGEN SCIENCES, LLC, QIAGEN LLC, FKA QIAGEN, INC., QIAGEN BEVERLY, LLC, FKA QIAGEN BEVERLY,
Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd.public domain
Case: 22-2216 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 08/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MOBILE ACUITY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. BLIPPAR LTD., BLIPPAR AR LTD., BLIPPAR GROUP LTD., BLIPBUILDER LTD., BLIPPAR USA LLC, Defendants-Appellees 07446749 LTD., FKA BLIPPAR.COM LTD, BLIPPAR
State v. Simmerpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/01/2019 09:06 AM CDT - 369 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 304 Nebraska R eports STATE v. SIMMER Cite as 304 Neb. 369 State of Nebraska,
State v. Simmerpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/24/2020 09:08 AM CST - 369 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 304 Nebraska Reports STATE v. SIMMER Cite as 304 Neb. 369 State of Nebraska, appe
State v. Fergusonpublic domain
54 So.3d 152 (2010) STATE of Louisiana v. Barry FERGUSON. No. 2009-KA-1422. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 15, 2010. *153 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Andrew M. Pickett, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for State of Louisiana. Katherine M. Franks, Louisiana Appellate Proj
M. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 31, 2017 1 Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018 PUBLISHED J.M. and V.M., in their Own Right and as Best Friends of their Son, V.J.M., No. 02-10V Petitioners, Chief Special Ma
Golden v. United Statespublic domain
FILED MAR 2 9 2018 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 3Jn tbe Wntteb ~tates q[:ourt of jfeberal q[:Iatms No . 13-307C