Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Barnes v. Ford Motor Company”
Edmond L. Lindsey v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Edmond Lindsey sued Ford Motor Company and Country Ford, alleging that he was sold a defective vehicle and was entitled to a full refund of the purchase price. Lindsey failed to provide support for his claim, and the circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Finding summary judgment was appropriately granted, we affirm.
Ford Motor Company v. Matthew Binghampublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-01056-COA FORD MOTOR COMPANY APPELLANT v. MATTHEW BINGHAM APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/16/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TONI DEMETRESSE TERRETT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WARREN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLA
Barnes v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
In re Barnes, Raymond Robert; Barnes, Patricia A.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ter-rebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 91,840; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 0107. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Ford Motor Co. v. Versata Software, Inc.public domain
DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *928Versata Software, Inc., f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc., Trilogy Development Group, Inc. and Trilogy, Inc. (collectively, "Versata"), defendants in Ford Motor Company v. Versata Software, Inc. , No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS (E.D. Mich.) (the "Michigan case"), have filed a Motion for Protective Or
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00994-COA TARAN JENKINS APPELLANT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND HOMER APPELLEES SKELTON FORD INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/30/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CELESTE EMBREY WILSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COU
Grant v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
CARLTON, J„ for the Court: 111. Kelly Grant, individually and as the personal representative of Makayla Mag-gard’s estate and the heirs-at-law and wrongful-death beneficiaries of Maggard, appeals the Clarke County Circuit Court’s grant, of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company (Ford). Grant raises the following assignments of error: whether the trial court erred by (1) failing to compel Ford to produc
Coleman v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
70 So.3d 223 (2011) Sandra COLEMAN, as Personal Representative of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Randy Coleman, Deceased, Appellant v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-00207-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 11, 2011. Rehearing Denied May 24, 2011. Certiorari Denied September 15, 2011.
Green v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
942 N.E.2d 791 (2011) Nicholas A. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 94S00-1007-CQ-348. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 8, 2011. *792 David V. Scott, New Albany, IN, James Orville McDonald, Terre Haute, IN, Gail Gaus-Renshaw, Lakinchapman LLC, Wood River, IL, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Nelson D. Alexa
Remy v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
DONOHUE, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 30, 2006) This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation of Evidence or, in the alternative for Lack of Prosecution. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED on both grounds. *144
Morris v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
IRVING, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. Michael Moms and Claire Morris (the Morrises), husband and wife, sued Ford Motor Company (Ford), Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI), and Tom Wimberly Auto World, Inc. (Wimberly)1 after a malfunction in the Morrises’ Lincoln Town Car allegedly caused the car to catch on fire, resulting in the burning of their home. After discovery, Ford filed a motion for su
Barnes v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
382 S.E.2d 842 (1989) Bernie R. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 8811DC1242. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 5, 1989. *843 Thomas H. Lock, Smithfield, for plaintiff-appellee. Faison & Brown by Aida Fayar Doss and Mark C. Kirby, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. LEWIS, Judge.
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
637 S.E.2d 202 (2006) JOHNSON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al. Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Johnson. Ford Motor Company v. Johnson. Nos. A06A0839-A06A0841. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 7, 2006. Peter K. Kintz, Atlanta, for Johnson. Holland & Knight, Alfred B. Adams III, Susan E. Edlein, Anita L. Schick, Atlanta, for Texas Instrument
Ford Motor Co. v. Rushfordpublic domain
845 N.E.2d 197 (2006) FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Eby Ford Lincoln Mercury a/k/a Eby Ford Sales, Inc., Appellants-Defendants, v. Marilyn RUSHFORD, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 20A03-0506-CV-293. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 11, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 6, 2006. *198 Eric A. Riegner, Nelson D. Alexander, Locke Reyn
Wickersham v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Crystal L. Wickersham; Crystal L. Wickersham, as personal representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001124 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Opinion No. 28003 Heard September 17, 2020 – Filed December 9, 2020 CERTIFIED QUE
Greensboro Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
600 S.E.2d 631 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 773 GREENSBORO FORD, INC. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. A04A0022. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 19, 2004. Reconsideration Denied June 14, 2004. Certiorari Denied September 27, 2004. *632 William R. Oliver, Cornelia, for appellant. S
Schultz v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
822 N.E.2d 645 (2005) Richard SCHULTZ and Gail Schultz, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-0309-CV-749. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 21, 2005. *647 Bruce D. Aukerman, Mann Law Firm, Terre Haute, IN, Roger L. Pardieck, The Pardieck Law Firm, Seymour, IN, Craig R. McClellan, John H.
Kolby O'Banion, Taylor O'Banion, Tim O'Banion, and Kelly O'Banion v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
BARNES, Judge. Case Summary [1] Kolby, Taylor, Tim, and Kelly O’Banion (“the O’Banions”), Michael Roush as Executor of the Estate of Karen Roush (“the Estate”), and Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”) (collectively “the Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). We reverse and r
Greensboro Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
568 S.E.2d 758 (2002) 256 Ga. App. 520 GREENSBORO FORD, INC. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. Ford Motor Company v. Greensboro Ford, Inc. Nos. A02A0160, A02A0161. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 27, 2002. Reconsideration Denied July 16, 2002. Anthony Kirkland, Marietta, David C. Carnahan, Eatonton, for appellant. S
Newbern v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Steven Newbern and Claudia Newbern, Appellants, v. Ford Motor Company, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2016-002209 Appeal From Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5680 Heard June 4, 2019 – Filed August 21, 2
Crystal Wickersham v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2131 CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM; CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham, Jr., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the