⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Barnes v. Ford Motor Company”

Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 1× · 271 So. 3d 757
BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Edmond Lindsey sued Ford Motor Company and Country Ford, alleging that he was sold a defective vehicle and was entitled to a full refund of the purchase price. Lindsey failed to provide support for his claim, and the circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Finding summary judgment was appropriately granted, we affirm.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2026-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-01056-COA FORD MOTOR COMPANY APPELLANT v. MATTHEW BINGHAM APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/16/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TONI DEMETRESSE TERRETT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WARREN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLA
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 690 So. 2d 36; 1997 La. LEXIS 778; 1997 WL 125668
In re Barnes, Raymond Robert; Barnes, Patricia A.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ter-rebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 91,840; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 0107. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2017-03-08 · Published · cited 7× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 925
DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *928Versata Software, Inc., f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc., Trilogy Development Group, Inc. and Trilogy, Inc. (collectively, "Versata"), defendants in Ford Motor Company v. Versata Software, Inc. , No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS (E.D. Mich.) (the "Michigan case"), have filed a Motion for Protective Or
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2025-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00994-COA TARAN JENKINS APPELLANT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND HOMER APPELLEES SKELTON FORD INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/30/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CELESTE EMBREY WILSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COU
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012-05-08 · Published · cited 2× · 89 So. 3d 655; 2012 WL 1592170; 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 260
CARLTON, J„ for the Court: 111. Kelly Grant, individually and as the personal representative of Makayla Mag-gard’s estate and the heirs-at-law and wrongful-death beneficiaries of Maggard, appeals the Clarke County Circuit Court’s grant, of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company (Ford). Grant raises the following assignments of error: whether the trial court erred by (1) failing to compel Ford to produc
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011-01-11 · Published · cited 4× · 70 So. 3d 223; 2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 4; 2011 WL 71473
70 So.3d 223 (2011) Sandra COLEMAN, as Personal Representative of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Randy Coleman, Deceased, Appellant v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-00207-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 11, 2011. Rehearing Denied May 24, 2011. Certiorari Denied September 15, 2011.
Indiana Supreme Court · 2011-02-08 · Published · cited 26× · 942 N.E.2d 791; 2011 Ind. LEXIS 66; 2011 WL 400343
942 N.E.2d 791 (2011) Nicholas A. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 94S00-1007-CQ-348. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 8, 2011. *792 David V. Scott, New Albany, IN, James Orville McDonald, Terre Haute, IN, Gail Gaus-Renshaw, Lakinchapman LLC, Wood River, IL, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Nelson D. Alexa
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 48 V.I. 141; 2006 WL 3937343; 2006 V.I. LEXIS 28
DONOHUE, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 30, 2006) This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation of Evidence or, in the alternative for Lack of Prosecution. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED on both grounds. *144
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 936 So. 2d 432; 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 574; 2006 WL 2256467
IRVING, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. Michael Moms and Claire Morris (the Morrises), husband and wife, sued Ford Motor Company (Ford), Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI), and Tom Wimberly Auto World, Inc. (Wimberly)1 after a malfunction in the Morrises’ Lincoln Town Car allegedly caused the car to catch on fire, resulting in the burning of their home. After discovery, Ford filed a motion for su
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989-09-05 · Published · cited 3× · 382 S.E.2d 842; 95 N.C. App. 367; 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 748
382 S.E.2d 842 (1989) Bernie R. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 8811DC1242. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 5, 1989. *843 Thomas H. Lock, Smithfield, for plaintiff-appellee. Faison & Brown by Aida Fayar Doss and Mark C. Kirby, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. LEWIS, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-07-07 · Published · cited 12× · 637 S.E.2d 202; 281 Ga. App. 166; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2308; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 843
637 S.E.2d 202 (2006) JOHNSON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al. Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Johnson. Ford Motor Company v. Johnson. Nos. A06A0839-A06A0841. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 7, 2006. Peter K. Kintz, Atlanta, for Johnson. Holland & Knight, Alfred B. Adams III, Susan E. Edlein, Anita L. Schick, Atlanta, for Texas Instrument
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006-04-11 · Published · cited 2× · 845 N.E.2d 197; 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 632; 2006 WL 921922
845 N.E.2d 197 (2006) FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Eby Ford Lincoln Mercury a/k/a Eby Ford Sales, Inc., Appellants-Defendants, v. Marilyn RUSHFORD, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 20A03-0506-CV-293. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 11, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 6, 2006. *198 Eric A. Riegner, Nelson D. Alexander, Locke Reyn
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Crystal L. Wickersham; Crystal L. Wickersham, as personal representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001124 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Opinion No. 28003 Heard September 17, 2020 – Filed December 9, 2020 CERTIFIED QUE
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 600 S.E.2d 631; 267 Ga. App. 773; 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1749; 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 693
600 S.E.2d 631 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 773 GREENSBORO FORD, INC. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. A04A0022. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 19, 2004. Reconsideration Denied June 14, 2004. Certiorari Denied September 27, 2004. *632 William R. Oliver, Cornelia, for appellant. S
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005-02-21 · Published · cited 4× · 822 N.E.2d 645; 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 220; 2005 WL 399609
822 N.E.2d 645 (2005) Richard SCHULTZ and Gail Schultz, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-0309-CV-749. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 21, 2005. *647 Bruce D. Aukerman, Mann Law Firm, Terre Haute, IN, Roger L. Pardieck, The Pardieck Law Firm, Seymour, IN, Craig R. McClellan, John H.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-09-09 · Published · cited 7× · 43 N.E.3d 635; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 619; 2015 WL 5254116
BARNES, Judge. Case Summary [1] Kolby, Taylor, Tim, and Kelly O’Banion (“the O’Banions”), Michael Roush as Executor of the Estate of Karen Roush (“the Estate”), and Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”) (collectively “the Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). We reverse and r
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 568 S.E.2d 758; 256 Ga. App. 520; 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2030; 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 872
568 S.E.2d 758 (2002) 256 Ga. App. 520 GREENSBORO FORD, INC. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. Ford Motor Company v. Greensboro Ford, Inc. Nos. A02A0160, A02A0161. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 27, 2002. Reconsideration Denied July 16, 2002. Anthony Kirkland, Marietta, David C. Carnahan, Eatonton, for appellant. S
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Steven Newbern and Claudia Newbern, Appellants, v. Ford Motor Company, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2016-002209 Appeal From Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5680 Heard June 4, 2019 – Filed August 21, 2
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-05-13 · Published · cited 29× · 997 F.3d 526
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2131 CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM; CRYSTAL L. WICKERSHAM, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Harley Wickersham, Jr., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the