Cases

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Baron appeals the district court's dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of his bankruptcy "adversary proceeding" against Daniel J. Sherman, the trustee responsible for administering the bankruptcy estate of Ondova Limited Company. Baron also appeals the denial of his motion for leave to amend. We review both de novo .

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: These consolidated interlocutory appeals arise from the district court’s appointment of a receiver over Jeffrey Baron’s personal property and entities he owned or controlled. The district court sought to stop Baron’s practice of regularly firing one lawyer and hiring a new one. This practice vexed the litigation involving Baron’s alleged bre

OPINION OF THE COURT Lewis J. Lubell, J. *564Plaintiffs commenced this action for equitable and declaratory relief and money damages in connection with, among other things, certain written agreements executed by plaintiff Alan J. Ross and defendant Steven Sherman concerning certain real property located in Chester, New York (the Riley Road property)

[Cite as Sherman v. Eichenlaub, 2025-Ohio-1880.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY MARY SHERMAN, ET AL., : CASE NO. CA2024-08-017 Appellees, : O P I N I O N AND

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

Case: 10-11202 Document: 00512087819 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2012 No. 10-11202

Gary D. Witt, Judge Appellant Linda Gerken along with a class composed of pensioners of Missouri’s Blind Pension Fund (collectively “Pensioners”) appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County giving some, but not all, relief requested against The Missouri Family Support Division and the Director of the Department of Social Services (collectively “Division”). The Pensio

338 B.R. 554 (2005) In re Bruce KLUTCHKO, Debtor. Marcy Baron, Plaintiff, v. Bruce Klutchko, Defendant. Richard O'Connell, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Bruce Klutchko, Plaintiff, v. Bruce Klutchko, Defendant. Richard O'Connell, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Bruce Klutchko, Plaintiff, v. Nathawan Sudbanthad and Sun River International, Ltd., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-41244(RDD), Adversary Nos. 03-02124 (R

[1] OPINION [2] This case is before the court on appeal by the defendant, the State of Rhode Island, from a November 19, 1987 order of the Superior Court granting the estate of Paul K. Sherman pre- and postjudgment interest on an April 22, 1987 judgment rendered against the State in a civil suit. The defendant also appeals a November 19, 1987 order of the Superior Court allowing the guardian ad litem's attorney to collect a fee of 45 percent of the gross verdict. We fi

This is a forcible entry and detainer action which involves only the question of whether the defendants were wrongfully detaining possession of the premises. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs from which the defendants appealed. Pending the appeal in this court defendants voluntarily surrendered possession of the premises to the plaintiffs, and appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the matter involved is now moot. This motion is supported by af