Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Barrett A Middleton”
In re the Marriage of Middletonpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 99-3-00406-1, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered May 14, 2008. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Middleton-Thomas v. Piat, Inc.public domain
John W. Lungstrum, United States District Judge Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against defendant Piat, Inc. alleging race discrimination and racial harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiff Cleveland asserts two additi
Middleton v. Middletonpublic domain
113 S.W.3d 625 (2003) Jeanette MIDDLETON v. Heath MIDDLETON. No. CA 03-122. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. August 27, 2003. Bill E. Bracey, Jr., Blytheville, for appellant. Mikke Connealy, Blytheville, for appellee. OLLY NEAL, Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court granting a change of custody to the appellee, H
Middleton v. Brown Middletonpublic domain
812 A.2d 1241 (2002) Edmund L. MIDDLETON a/k/a Edmund Lewis Middleton, Appellant, v. Lenora H. BROWN MIDDLETON, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted June 27, 2002. Filed December 2, 2002. *1242 Brian S. Quinn, Havertown, for appellant. Peter A. DeLiberty, Broomall, for appellee. Before: DEL SOLE, P.J.
Giancola v. Middletonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Order affirmed without costs. In this owner-occupancy holdover proceeding (see Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a]), landlords’ notice of nonrenewal stated, in relevant part: “[0]ne of the Landlord/Owners [ ] seeks to recover possession of the premises involved for the personal use and occupancy of the premises involved by
A & B Irrigation District v. Statepublic domain
BURDICK, Chief Justice. This appeal arises out of the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA) court’s decision on the following basin-wide issue: Does Idaho law require a remark authorizing storage rights to “refill,” under priority, space vacated for flood control? The SRBA court concluded that a remark was not necessary because a storage water right, that is filled cannot refill under priority before affected junior appropri
City of Middleton v. Coleman Homes, LLCpublic domain
BURDICK, Chief Justice. Coleman Homes, LLC, West Highlands, LLC, West Highlands Subdivision Homeowner's Association, Inc., and West Highlands Land, LLC (collectively, "Appellants") bring this appeal from the Canyon County district court. Appellants entered into two agreements with the City of Middleton (the "City") regarding impact fees and public access space for the West Highlands Ran
Powell v. Barrettpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: We granted rehearing en banc to decide whether a policy or practice of strip searching all arrestees as part of the process of booking them into the general population of a detention facility, even without reasonable suspicion to believe that they may be concealing contraband, is constitutionally permissible. We answer that question in the affirmative, at least where the strip search is no more intru
Powell v. Barrettpublic domain
496 F.3d 1288 (2007) C. Alan POWELL, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Tory Dunlap, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. Sheriff Jacqueline BARRETT, Fulton County, State of Georgia, Sheriff Myron Freeman, Fulton County, State of Georgia, et al., Defendants-Appellants Cross-Appellees. No. 05-16734. Unit
Powell v. Barrettpublic domain
541 F.3d 1298 (2008) C. Alan POWELL, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Tory Dunlap, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Lee Antonio Smith, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated, David Evans, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. Sheriff Jacqueline BARRETT, Fulton County, State of Georgia, Sheriff Myron Freem
Powell v. Barrettpublic domain
376 F.Supp.2d 1340 (2005) C. Alan POWELL, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Tory Dunlap, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Lee Antonio Smith, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; David Evans, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Jacqueline BARRETT, Fulton County, State of Georgia; Sheriff Myron Freeman, Fulton County, St
State v. Barrettpublic domain
41 S.W.3d 561 (2001) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lendell Ray BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 23390. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. February 21, 2001. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied March 14, 2001. Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001. *563
John Middleton v. Al Luebberspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-3160 ___________ John Middleton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distric
John Middleton v. Don Roper, 1public domain
RILEY, Circuit Judge. A Missouri state court sentenced John A. Middleton (Middleton) to death following Middleton’s convictions for two counts of first-degree murder. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed Middleton’s convictions and sentences on direct appeal, and later affirmed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. Middleton timely applied for a writ of habeas corp
Mayes v. Summit Entm't Corp.public domain
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. On November 23, 2016, Plaintiffs Ursula Mayes, Eva Pepaj, Jaime Edmondson, Jaime Middleton, Jennifer Archuletta, Rachel Koren, Tiffany Toth, and Vida Guerra initiated this lawsuit. (Compl. (Dkt. 1).) Plaintiffs are professional models who state that they earn their livelihood selling their images to companies, magazines, and individuals for advertising purposes. (Id. ¶¶ 9-
Whitson v. Middleton (In Re Middleton)public domain
100 B.R. 814 (1988) In re Frank Jeffrey MIDDLETON, Debtor. Gary L. WHITSON, Jr., and Gary L. Whitson, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. Frank Jeffrey MIDDLETON, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 87-03630-NT, Adv. Pro. No. 88-0313-NT. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 30, 1988. *815 Bruce A. Wilcox, Tavss and
Barrett v. Barrettpublic domain
715 S.W.2d 110 (1986) Patricia Lee BARRETT, Appellant, v. Ewing D. BARRETT, Jr., Appellee. No. 9459. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. July 8, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 3, 1986. *111 Joe Villarreal, Jr., Villarreal & Barnett, San Antonio, for appellant. John M. Economidy, San Antonio, for ap
Mathis v. Barrettpublic domain
544 A.2d 287 (1988) Frank MATHIS, Jr., Appellant, v. Ulysses BARRETT, Appellee. No. 85-179. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted June 21, 1988. Decided July 13, 1988. Melvin A. Marshall, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Ulysses Barrett did not file an appearance. Before FERREN, BELSON and TERRY, Associate
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
French v. Barrettpublic domain
733 P.2d 89 (1987) 84 Or.App. 52 Linda S. FRENCH, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. Patrick Allen BARRETT, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Louis L. Linton, Patricia A. Linton, and Tamera Ann Barrett, Fka Tamera Ann Linton, Respondents. 16-83-08882; CA A35210. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 19, 1986. Decided February 2