Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Barry Keith Moore”
Ex Parte Barry Moorepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 12, 2019 No. 04-19-00355-CR EX PARTE Barry MOORE Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 ORDER On May 28, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Becaus
United States v. Frank Smith, Keith McCain Russell Ellis, Eric Wilson, Sherman Moore, Steven Pink and Charles Poteetepublic domain
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. For many years, the Gangster Disciples (GD) street gang operated a massive drug distribution business in the Chicago area. Eventually, the government caught up with it, and in 1995 the grand jury returned indictments against different members of the GD gang. We considered the appeals of other GDs in United States v. Jackson, 207 F.
*680After careful consideration of Respondents' petition for rehearing, the Court grants the petition for rehearing, dispenses with further briefing, and substitutes the attached opinion for the opinion previously filed in this matter. /s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.
310 F.3d 927 Barry BAKER; Anonymous Plaintiff # 1, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.ADAMS COUNTY/OHIO VALLEY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellant,Christine Armstrong et al., Defendants,Kenneth W. Johnson et al., Intervening Defendants. No. 02-3777. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Filed: November 19, 2002.
Barry v. Moorepublic domain
108 N.W.2d 401 (1961) 172 Neb. 57 Janice E. BARRY, Appellant, v. Keith T. MOORE, Appellee. No. 34920. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 31, 1961. *402 Richards, Yost & Schafersman, Fremont, for appellant. Chambers, Holland, Dudgeon & Hastings, Lincoln, for appellee. Heard before CARTER
Keith Ford v. Suzanne Peerypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH UNDRAY FORD, No. 18-15498 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-02463- MCE-GGH SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United
Keith Ford v. Suzanne Peerypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH UNDRAY FORD, No. 18-15498 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-02463- MCE-GGH SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United St
Keith Tharpe v. Wardenpublic domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This is the latest iteration in a series of challenges brought by Keith Leroy Tharpe to the sentence of death he received in 1991 for kidnapping his wife and kidnapping and murdering Jaquelin Freeman, his sister-in-law. After decades of litigation and having exhausted his opportunities for relief on direct an
Rel: March 7, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,
State v. Moorepublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Robert Lee Moore, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2017-002479 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27948 Heard June 11, 2019
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 572–652 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
State v. Raheem Moorepublic domain
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. ¶ 118. (dissenting). When the defendant was 15 years old, he was interrogated by the police about a murder that had *423recently taken place. After roughly 11 hours in custody, the defendant confessed to the crime. The defendant now seeks to suppress his confession. ¶ 119. The defendant argues that admission of his confe
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Walter Allen died of a brain cancer known as glioblastoma multiforme after having been a maintenance worker at Baton Rouge General Hospital for over 20 years. During that time, he occasionally replaced cylinders containing ethylene oxide (“EtO”), a chemical that has been widely used in this country to sterilize heat and moisture sensitive medical a
Moore v. Statepublic domain
Ellington, Judge. Keith Barry Moore appeals from a default judgment in a forfeiture action under OCGA § 16-16-2. The forfeiture petition was filed in the Douglas County Superior Court on April 5, 2001, and Moore was personally served the next day. Moore’s answer was file stamped by the trial court on Monday, May 7, 2001, 31 days after service. The State requested a default judgment, which the trial court granted. See OCGA § 9-
State v. Raheem Moorepublic domain
2015 WI 54 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP127-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raheem Moore, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.public domain
ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Previously, the Court denied Universal’s Motion to Dismiss, concluding that a settlement offer by Universal
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this putative class-action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq, Based on a settlement offer made in March 2016, Universal now argues Ung’s
Le-Ax Water District v. City of Athens, Ohiopublic domain
346 F.3d 701 LE-AX WATER DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF ATHENS, OHIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-3016. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 12, 2003. Decided and Filed: October 10, 2003. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: December 30, 2003. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 <
State of Tennessee v. Barry Wayne Dunhampublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 16, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BARRY WAYNE DUNHAM Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Macon County No. 97-71 J. O. Bond, Judge No. M2003-02802-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 1, 2005 The defendant, Barry Wayne Dunham, was convicted by a Macon County Criminal Court
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Presently before the Court is Ung’s Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that