⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Barry Keith Moore”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2019-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 12, 2019 No. 04-19-00355-CR EX PARTE Barry MOORE Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 ORDER On May 28, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Becaus
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000-08-17 · Published · cited 163× · 223 F.3d 554; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 970; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20924
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. For many years, the Gangster Disciples (GD) street gang operated a massive drug distribution business in the Chicago area. Eventually, the government caught up with it, and in 1995 the grand jury returned indictments against different members of the GD gang. We considered the appeals of other GDs in United States v. Jackson, 207 F.
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018-11-14 · Published · cited 5× · 821 S.E.2d 677; 425 S.C. 213
*680After careful consideration of Respondents' petition for rehearing, the Court grants the petition for rehearing, dispenses with further briefing, and substitutes the attached opinion for the opinion previously filed in this matter. /s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002-11-19 · Published · cited 82× · 310 F.3d 927; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 452; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23744; 2002 WL 31553260
310 F.3d 927 Barry BAKER; Anonymous Plaintiff # 1, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.ADAMS COUNTY/OHIO VALLEY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellant,Christine Armstrong et al., Defendants,Kenneth W. Johnson et al., Intervening Defendants. No. 02-3777. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Filed: November 19, 2002.
Barry v. Moorepublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961-03-31 · Published · cited 11× · 108 N.W.2d 401; 172 Neb. 57; 1961 Neb. LEXIS 45
108 N.W.2d 401 (1961) 172 Neb. 57 Janice E. BARRY, Appellant, v. Keith T. MOORE, Appellee. No. 34920. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 31, 1961. *402 Richards, Yost & Schafersman, Fremont, for appellant. Chambers, Holland, Dudgeon & Hastings, Lincoln, for appellee. Heard before CARTER
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-09-28 · Published · cited 4× · 976 F.3d 1032
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH UNDRAY FORD, No. 18-15498 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-02463- MCE-GGH SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH UNDRAY FORD, No. 18-15498 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-02463- MCE-GGH SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United St
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-08-25 · Published · cited 144× · 834 F.3d 1323; 2016 WL 4479295
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This is the latest iteration in a series of challenges brought by Keith Leroy Tharpe to the sentence of death he received in 1991 for kidnapping his wife and kidnapping and murdering Jaquelin Freeman, his sister-in-law. After decades of litigation and having exhausted his opportunities for relief on direct an
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: March 7, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,
State v. Moorepublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2020-02-19 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Robert Lee Moore, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2017-002479 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27948 Heard June 11, 2019
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-20 · Published · cited 12× · 602 U.S. 572
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 572–652 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015-06-16 · Published · cited 29× · 363 Wis. 2d 376; 2015 WI 54; 864 N.W.2d 827; 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 323
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. ¶ 118. (dissenting). When the defendant was 15 years old, he was interrogated by the police about a murder that had *423recently taken place. After roughly 11 hours in custody, the defendant confessed to the crime. The defendant now seeks to suppress his confession. ¶ 119. The defendant argues that admission of his confe
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996-12-31 · Published · cited 387× · 102 F.3d 194; 46 Fed. R. Serv. 215; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33975; 1996 WL 714351
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Walter Allen died of a brain cancer known as glioblastoma multiforme after having been a maintenance worker at Baton Rouge General Hospital for over 20 years. During that time, he occasionally replaced cylinders containing ethylene oxide (“EtO”), a chemical that has been widely used in this country to sterilize heat and moisture sensitive medical a
Moore v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 251 Ga. App. 565; 554 S.E.2d 574; 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2763; 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1046
Ellington, Judge. Keith Barry Moore appeals from a default judgment in a forfeiture action under OCGA § 16-16-2. The forfeiture petition was filed in the Douglas County Superior Court on April 5, 2001, and Moore was personally served the next day. Moore’s answer was file stamped by the trial court on Monday, May 7, 2001, 31 days after service. The State requested a default judgment, which the trial court granted. See OCGA § 9-
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
2015 WI 54 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP127-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raheem Moore, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 198 F. Supp. 3d 1036; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102363; 2016 WL 4132244
ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Previously, the Court denied Universal’s Motion to Dismiss, concluding that a settlement offer by Universal
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 190 F. Supp. 3d 855; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1904; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72861; 2016 WL 3136858
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this putative class-action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq, Based on a settlement offer made in March 2016, Universal now argues Ung’s
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-12-30 · Published · cited 35× · 346 F.3d 701; 2003 WL 22316810
346 F.3d 701 LE-AX WATER DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF ATHENS, OHIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-3016. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 12, 2003. Decided and Filed: October 10, 2003. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: December 30, 2003. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 <
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 16, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BARRY WAYNE DUNHAM Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Macon County No. 97-71 J. O. Bond, Judge No. M2003-02802-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 1, 2005 The defendant, Barry Wayne Dunham, was convicted by a Macon County Criminal Court
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017-01-24 · Published · cited 5× · 319 F.R.D. 537; 96 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1013; 2017 WL 354238; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10078
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Presently before the Court is Ung’s Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that