Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

This suit was instituted May 14, 1906, by Elizabeth Hames and her seven children, two of whom were minors, against L. D. Stroud and M. S. Bailey. The nature of the suit was to set aside a certain conveyance for fraud, and to recover 124 acres of land, alleging, in substance, that L. D. Stroud, the attorney for appellants, had, as such attorney, gained their confidence, and had thereby fraudulently overreached them in his dealings with them. Answers were filed, and upon a hearing the court ins

930 P.2d 556 (1996) CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATES, Stephen M. Field, Myra G. Field, Margaret Sofro, and Howard P. Summers, Petitioners, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation, Respondent. Nos. 95SC563, 95SC688. Supreme Court of Colorado, En B

299 S.W.3d 707 (2009) Loretta PHELPS, Respondent, v. Clay R. PHELPS and Vicki Phelps, his wife, Appellants. No. SD 29074. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 9, 2009. Petition for Rehearing or Transfer Denied December 1, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied January 26, 2010.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2329 ___________________________ Amir Brandy Plaintiff - Appellee v. City of St. Louis, Missouri Defendant

SEARS, Presiding Justice, dissenting. Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court improperly restricted Mangum’s cross-examination of the State’s juvenile witnesses concerning whether they had pending juvenile charges against them or were on probation stemming from juvenile charges, I must dissent to the reversal of Mangum’s conviction. However, because I conclude that the trial court

POOLER, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of who may be held liable under Section 296(15) of the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), which prohibits the denial of employment on the basis of a criminal conviction. See N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(15). The plaintiffs are two former employees of Astro Moving and Storage Co. (“Astro”), which, as its name suggests, provides certain moving and storage servi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 22, 2014 Session LEON DICKSON, SR. v. SIDNEY H. KRIGER, M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-005591-04 James F. Russell, Judge No. W2013-02830-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 30, 2014 Patient brought a health care liability action against his eye s

ORDER GORTON, United . States District Judge After careful consideration- of the objections of defendants Dyana Nickl -and Geraldine Riendeau (Docket No. 122) and defendants Barbara Berg, Shawna Nasuti, Paul Caratazzola, Patricia Davenport-Mel-lo and Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare (“MPCH”) (Docket No. 123) to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Marianne B.

646 F.Supp.2d 594 (2009) Lawrence DAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. Paul GONYEA et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 2194 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 18, 2009. *601 Lawrence Dawkins, Sonyea, NY, pro se. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Lawrence

721 S.W.2d 728 (1986) John W. DRAKE, Appellant, v. Rebecca C. DRAKE and R. Lee Steers, Jr., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. November 21, 1986. Rehearing Denied December 31, 1986. *729 David F. Broderick, David W. Anderson, Cole, Harned & Broderick, Bowling Green, for appellant. R. Lee Steers, Jr., Steers, Stee

134 Ill. App.3d 628 (1985) 481 N.E.2d 47 WALTER SKOGLUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARSHALL BLANKENSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. No. 84-1298. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3d Division). Opinion filed June 28, 1985. *629 Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, of Chicago (Robert Marc Chemers, of counsel)

567 F.Supp. 1532 (1983) James R. DAVIDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 80-0757-CV-W-9. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. July 15, 1983. *1533 *1534 *1535 Larry M. Brummet and Jay T. Grodsky, Bru

Spina, J. In this complex case, we consider the obligations of an insurance company, and the counsel it hires, to defend an insured against a third-party claim. The plaintiffs, collectively known as Sullivan Risk Management Group (SRMG), commenced an action against Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica Mutual), seeking damages for Utica Mutual’s alleged failure to provide SRMG with an adequate defense to claims brought against i

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANEESA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-1540 (CRC) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza following Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on the country roiled American co

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant The Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) appeals from a judgment holding it liable under an insurance policy issued to plaintiff-appellee Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J (“Adams-Arapahoe” or “the District”) for expenses incurred after the partial collapse of the roof of Gateway High School in Aurora,

URBIGKIT, Justice. We consider two questions certified from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit: Does an insurance company owe a duty of good faith to its policyholders not to unreasonably deny a claim for benefits under the policy, the breach of which duty gives rise to an independent tort action? If such a tort action is permitted, in a

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY, DIAMONDROCK FRENCHMAN’S OWNER, INC., Plaintiffs, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBERS PRPNA1700847 AND PRPNAI 702387, THE PRINCETON EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, XL INSURANCE CASE NO. ST-18-CV-399 ACTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND MONEY DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AMERICA, INC. Defendants.

248 Ga. 154 (1981) 282 S.E.2d 76 SMITH v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al. STATE OF GEORGIA et al. v. BRUCE et al. ROWLAND HILLS CORPORATION et al. v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al. 37291, 37292, 37293. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided September 17, 1981. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Patricia Barmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, T

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner, White-Rodgers Co., seeks the issuance of a writ of prohibition directed to the District Court of Weld County and the respondent judge thereof to prevent them from proceeding in an action pending in that court. White-Rodgers Co. was named as one of several defendants in an action brought in the District Court by the Respondents, The Rectors, Wardens and Vestrymen of Trinity Church of Greeley, Colorado, and Charles V. Young. The