Cases

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 117. in C 12-cv-6293 SI and Dkt. No. 141 in C 12-cv-6294 SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge On December 2, 2014, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motions for summary judgment of invalidity of plaintiffs patents-in-suit under 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’

JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Now before the Court is the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook"). Having carefully reviewed the parties' papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS Facebook's motion for judgment on the pleadings. BACKGROUND Facebook moves for judgment on the plea

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue filed by defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com, LLC (collectively “Amazon”). Dkt. No. 73. Also before the Court are motions to dismiss the plaintiffs claims of indirect and willful infringement filed by defendants Amazon; Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Best Buy”); and Time

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [16] THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Universal Wilde, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “UW”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (Dkt. 16). The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. Having reviewed the moving papers and considered the parties’ argumen

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 129, 131] filed by Defendant Taplogic, LLC, and a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 142] filed by Plaintiff Agri-Labs Holding LLC. The Defendant has moved for summary judgment on non-infringement, invalidity, and lack of personal jurisdiction and venue. The Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment on infringement. These

ORDER WALTER S. SMITH, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (“Affinity”) filed the instant patent infringement suit, which was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for all *919purposes. Doc. 9. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rules 1(h) and 4(b) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United State

As to Plain Green, Plaintiffs allege that the Haynes Defendants, in conjunction with other actors and through a web of entities, actually "funded and partially operated" the so-called "rent-a-tribe" scheme at the heart of this case. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Haynes Defendants and *909several non-tribal actors entered into a term sheet in support of the unlawful t

ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION . In this patent case, plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) accuses Sophos, Inc. (“Sophos”) of infringing five of Finjan’s patents in the malware security software space. Following a two week trial, a jury found that Sophos infringed all five of Finjan’s asserted patents and awarded damages of $15

John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge This case involves technology that helps businesses pry into peoples' personal preferences and privacy. Advertisers use targeted marketing techniques to place advertisements in places likely to reach interested consumers. For example, advertisers for pizza buy commercials during football games and advertisers for diapers buy ads in parenting magazines. This time-tested technique has

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND.. .32 A. Factual Background... 32 B. Procedural History.. .33 1. Initial Complaint and Pre-Trial Proceedings.. .33 2. Jury Verdict... 34 3. Post-Trial Motions... 34 C. Applicable Standards of Review.. .35

*1160ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS RONALD M. WHYTE, United States District Judge Defendants Sprint Nextel Corporation, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Sprint Solutions Inc., Apple, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Foursquare Labs, Inc., Groupon, Inc., LivingSo-cial, Inc., Twitter, Inc:, Ye

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. I. Introductory Statement The joinder provision of the America Invents Act (“AIA”) has had an evident impact on the procedural handling of patent infringement actions in scenarios where a plaintiff seeks to hold multiple defendants liable based on similarly designed consumer products. 35 U.S.C. § 299. To the extent joinder of

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. This patent litigation concerns four patents 1 that Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants *509Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (together, “Intellectual Ventures companies” or “IV”) own and claim Defendants/Counterclaimants

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (“STA”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and alternativ

This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: August 12, 2024 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. The

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.'s (collectively, "HTC") motion to dismiss Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd.'s ("CyWee") claims for induced infringement. (MTD (Dkt. # 35).) The court has considered the motion, the parties' submissions in support of and in opposition to the motion to dismiss, the relevant porti