Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. On December 22, 2011, defendant Richard Snyder, Michigan’s governor, signed into law the Public Employee Domestic Partner Benefit Restriction Act, Public Act 297 (2011), which prohibited local units of government f

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are five same-sex couples who allege that Michigan Pub-*946lie Act 297 (2011) is unconstitutional because it violates their rights und

Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I agree with the majority’s rationale as it concerns the attorney-fee matters but dissent relative to the class treatment as it was administered by the trial court. I. Preface Initially, the majority’s overarching approach to this appeal appears to suggest liberality in favor of class certification. I have no objection, to the degree that this doe

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge h Lydia Burch appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Board of Review (Board of Review) denying her claim for unemployment benefits on account of misconduct in connection with the work. She argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding. We affirm. On July 13, 2015, Weldon, W

Yerich v Bassett Healthcare Network (2019 NY Slip Op 07466) Yerich v Bassett Healthcare Network 2019 NY Slip Op 07466 Decided on October 17, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Repo

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are minor children who attend, or attended, public schools in Detroit. They have alleged that the conditions of their schools are so poor, and so inadequate, that they have not received even a minimally adequate education. Specifically, they alleged they have been denied access to literacy on account of their races, in violation of their rights under the Due Process and

112 Mich. App. 556 (1982) 316 N.W.2d 489 GREEK v. BASSETT Docket No. 51886. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 20, 1982. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich & Rosen (by Steven G. Silverman), for plaintiff. Buesser, Buesser, Snyder & Black (by William R. Buesser and Carol H. Lesnek

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are minor children who attend, or attended, public schools in Detroit. They have alleged that the conditions of their schools are so poor, and so inadequate, that they have not received even a minimally adequate education. Specifically, they alleged they have been denied access to literacy on account of their races, in violation of their rights under the Due Process and

333 S.E.2d 309 (1985) In the Matter of Franklin VANHORN and Willard J. Whisenant v. BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. and Employment Security Commission of North Carolina. No. 8425SC1137. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 20, 1985. Oma H. Hester, Jr., Hickory, for claimants-appellants. Jane H. Dittmann and T.S. Whitaker, Raleigh, respondent-appellee

OPINION JONES, Judge: ¶ 1 Burch and Cracchiolo (B & C), along with its clients, Michelle Lund, Kristen Lund Olson, and Karen Page (collectively, Petitioners), bring this special action challenging the trial court’s order disqualifying B & C from continuing to represent Petitioners in the underlying action seeking the appointment of a guardian and

Adams v Bassett Healthcare Network 2026 NY Slip Op 02706 April 30, 2026 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Richard C. Adams, Appellant, v Bassett Healthcare Network, Respondent. Decided and En

In re: LINDA JOSEPHINE SNYDER, Debtor. Case No. 09-61571-13. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. November 13, 2009. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RALPH B. KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge After due notice a hearing was held at Missoula on October 8, 2009, on the motion to modify stay filed by the Estate of Earl M. Pruyn ("Pruyn") on September 14, 2009, and Debtor's object

ORDER DEVINE, Chief Judge. The court now considers plaintiff’s objection to the February 20, 1992, Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the magistrate judge which concluded that plaintiff’s motion for remand should be denied. Background Plaintiff originally brought this suit in state court to perfect a labor and materials lien for unpaid goods and ser

NUMBER 13-19-00034-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DONALD CEGLAR, Appellant, v. CHRIST’S HARBOR CHURCH, GARY STONE, ELVIN GRAYSON AND GARY SNYDER, Appellees. On appeal from the 3

321 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2004) Connie SNYDER, Plaintiff(s), v. YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant(s). No. 4:02 CV 01713 RWS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. June 14, 2004. *1128 Robert McKinley, Lathrop & Gage L.C., Kansas City, KS, for Defendant. ORDER SIPPEL, Dist

Mabry, C. J.: The appellee.company, suing as a corporation, instituted an action of assumpsit against appellant in November, 1891. Pleas were filed b.y the defendant below .and a motion was made to strike them out because they were not sworn to, were frivolous and impertinent, and for judgment for want of pleas. This motion was granted on the 4th of February, 1892, and the clerk directed to assess the damages. The pleas copi

Liddor, J.: The appellee recovered a'judgment in the Circuit Court against the appellant. The record is so unskill - fully prepared that it is exceedingly difficult to ascertain the merits of the case. The assignments of error allege as erroneous many rulings of the court below, while the record does not show that any such rulings were made in the case. The brief of appellant discusses many matters which are not mentioned in

818 F.Supp. 1462 (1993) Lynn Ruth BASSETT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, a California Corporation, World Omni Financial Corporation, a Florida Corporation, and American Security Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-0694-P-S. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D.

Hall, Justice. The circumstances of the case are these: Executions had been obtained against one Cully, which, some three or four years, perhaps longer, after they had been issued, were levied on a certain lot of land in the possession of the claimant; and thereupo'n Mrs. Park interposed her claim to the same. It seems from the testimony that Mrs. Park and Mrs. Cully were the children of Mrs. Reynolds; that Cully was indebted

Banke, Judge. Boss contracted to design furniture for Barwick Industries, Inc., in return for Barwick’s agreement to pay him royalties on the sale of that furniture. The contract provided that the design documents and the manufacturing dies made from them were to be the property of Barwick but that Boss would retain a right of first refusal in the event Barwick chose to sell them. Upon termination of the contract, Barwick was