Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bates v. District Attorney's Office”
Jordan v. U.S. Attorney's Officepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND On May 14, 2012, plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the cap
Colbert v. United States Attorney's Officepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff has commenced three cases against three separate governmental defendants making similar allegations concerning his mail. These defendants now move to consolidate these cases. This motion will be granted. I. Background. First, Plaintiff fi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SANTOS MAXIMINO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-94 (JDB) EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Santos Maximino Garcia, proceeding pro se, brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FO
Bates v. Laminackpublic domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions to compel arbitration (D.E. 60, 62) filed by the O’Quinn Defendants1 and Defendant T. Gerald Treece,2 jointly referred to as “Movants.” Defendants Richard N. Laminack, Buffy Martines, and Thomas W. Pirtle filed a consent to arbit
United States v. Batespublic domain
*81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. Defendant, Harold Bates, charged with trafficking in methylone,1 moves to sup-pressvthe contents of four postal parcels, statements made regarding those parcels, and items found at his residence on December 7, 2013. The Court held evidentia-ry hearings on February 12,
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00238-CV The Attorney General of The State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Appellant v. Mark Gonzalez, District Attorney for the 105th Judicial District, and the Nueces County District Attorney’s Office, Appellees FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-000130, TH
Bates v. United States Governmentpublic domain
ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 49) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated February 14, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Partial Dismissal (Doc. 21) filed by the United St
United States v. Batespublic domain
750 F.Supp.2d 342 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony BATES, Defendant. Criminal No. 09-10357-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 5, 2010. *343 William W. Fick, Federal Public Defender Offices, District of Massachusetts, Floor Boston, MA, for Defendant. Robert E. Richardson, United States A
Bates v. Statepublic domain
177 S.W.3d 451 (2005) John Wayne BATES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-04-00033-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston. May 12, 2005. Discretionary Review Refused September 28, 2005. *452 Mark W. Stevens, The Law Office of Mark Stevens, Galveston, TX, for Appellant. Kurt
United States v. Batespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** 1. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 because 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 are “federal laws of nationwide applicability that make actions criminal wherever committed.” United States v. Begay, 42 F.3d 486, 498 (9th Cir.1994). 2. The district court reasonably disbelieved defendants’ explanations about why they pled guilty, United States v. Snider
Bates v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Roger Kenneth Bates appeals his convictions for sexual assault of a child. A jury found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at eleven years in each case, and the trial court ordered the sentences to run consecutively — "stacking" the sentences. In two issues, appellant argues the trial court erred by stacking the sentences and by including a definition of reasonable doubt in the jury charge. We affirm the trial court's judgments. <
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2025 VT 36
Bates v. Biggerpublic domain
192 F.Supp.2d 160 (2002) Melissa BATES and John Mahoney, Plaintiffs, v. Frank BIGGER, John Thompson, Ray McDonald, Dennis Barry, Richard Onorati and Richard Denehy, all sued in their individual capacities, Defendants. No. 01 Civ. 0403(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 12, 2002. *161
Bates v. Statepublic domain
88 S.W.3d 724 (2002) Charles Wayne BATES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 12-01-00293-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. July 24, 2002. Discretionary Review Refused September 11, 2002. *725 Nancy P. Perkins, Athens, for appellant. Donna R. Bennett, District Attorney's Office, Athens, app
Bates v. Barnhartpublic domain
222 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2002) Johnny R. BATES, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION No. 00-2408-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 23, 2002. *1253 *1254 Teresa M. Meagher, Law Office of Teresa M. Meagher, Leawoo
Bates v. Paksereshtpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESSICA BATES, No. 23-4169 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00474- AN v. Director FARIBORZ OPINION PAKSERESHT, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Human S
State v. Batespublic domain
[Cite as State v. Bates, 2024-Ohio-2909.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113438 v. : ANTONIO BATES, :
People v. Batespublic domain
2024 IL App (4th) 230011 FILED NOS. 4-23-0011, 4-23-0012 cons. June 26, 2024 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center v. Sebeliuspublic domain
660 F.Supp.2d 73 (2009) ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1015 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 8, 2009. *74 Dan Mark Peterson, Lara Eliz
Opinion issued March 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00017-CV ——————————— FRED ZELKOWITZ, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, 246TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT