Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 968 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 969 This case illustrates the danger of using preprinted wills. Decedent Haskell Dye had two natural sons who were adopted away (wit

OPINION BRADFORD, Judge. Appellant-Defendant Anthony Dye appeals following his guilty plea to Class B felony Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Serious Violent Felon1 (“SVF”) and a jury’s finding that he is a Habitual Offender,2 by virtue of which his twenty-year SVF sentence was enhanced by thirty years. Dye raises the following four issues, wh

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 183 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-23-330 Opinion Delivered March 19, 2025 JOHN RAY DYE AND BOBBYE JO DYE APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [N

OPINION PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge. I. OVERVIEW The petitioner, Paul Allen Dye (“Dye”), a Michigan prisoner convicted of first-and second-degree murders, appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleged, inter alia, prosecutorial misconduct.1 For the

JOHN, Judge. Defendant appeals judgment entered upon conviction by a jury of domestic criminal trespass. We vacate the judgment. The State’s evidence at trial tended to show the following: Defendant and Carey James Dye (Mr. Dye) divorced 14 December 1987. The two entered into a 20 February 1995 civil consent order (the Order) providing in pertinent part that “[defendant shall not come to the residence of [Mr

507 So.2d 332 (1987) Brad DYE, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Mississippi and President of the Senate of the State of Mississippi v. The STATE of Mississippi, EX REL. Richard Stephen HALE and Gene Taylor, Members of the Senate of the State of Mississippi. No. 57895. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 29, 1987. Rehearing Denied June 3, 1987.

John A. Fogleman, Justice. This appeal involves questions pertaining to the trial of an action to recover for damage to the automobile of John and Linda Dye in a collision with the motor vehicle of Willis E. Self. The collision occurred in the city limits of Rogers at the intersection of U.S. Highway 71 and Oak Street. Although no pleadings are abstracted, it is clear from appellant’s statement of the case

Order affirmed. Concur: judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilekpi and Bergak. Chief Judge Desmohd dissents and votes to reverse and grant a hearing on this corain nobis petition, in the following memorandum: These unusual and undisputed facts make it'at the very least a triable question of fact (to which a negative *671answer seems inevitable) as to whether defendant, you

Judgment affirmed; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

DAVIS, Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants brought suit in the District Court seeking monetary damages for, and appropriate injunctive relief from, alleged race discrimination said to be in violation of the Civil Rights Acts of 1870 and 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and § 1983 (1976). 1 After a full trial, the jury found that defen

Calhoun, Judge: On May 10, 1962, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, Article 1, Section 2a of Code, 1931, as amended, B. D. Bailey & Sons, Inc., filed with the state tax commissioner a petition for refund of certain taxes theretofore collected and paid under the provisions of Chapter 11, Article 13, Sections 2 and 2h of Code, 1931, as amended. On March 15,1963, the state tax commissioner made a ruling by which

This action was brought by United Dye Works, Inc., against Sophus Strom and his wife and Liberty Dry Cleaners, Inc., for damages for breach of a contract not to engage in the wholesale cleaning *Page 42 and dyeing business in the city of Seattle, and to enjoin further violations of the contract. Upon the trial to the court without a jury, the action was dismissed as to the defendant Liberty Dry Cleaners, Inc., and judgment was entered in favor of the plai

403 F.3d 164 In Re: WHITE MOUNTAIN MINING COMPANY, L.L.C., Debtor.Joseph C. Phillips, Plaintiff-Appellee, andMowbray, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee, andWhite Mountain Mining Company, L.L.C., a West Virginia Limited Liability Company, Reorganized Debtor-Appellee,v.Congelton, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant, andUnited States Trustee, Party in Interest.Alliance Consulting, Incorporated; Alpha Engineering Services; Comer Electric I

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MOTZ joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: A core issue in an adversary proceeding in this chapter 11 bankruptcy case was also an issue in an international arbitration to be conducted in England. The bankruptcy court denied a motion

OPINION KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge: This appeal involves the interplay between priority tax status under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8) and Montana’s statute imposing individual liability on “responsible officers” of corporations that do not pay their taxes. .The joint debtors owned and managed a corporation that did not pay its state unempl

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0273p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SENATOR JONATHAN LINDSEY; SENATOR JAMES │ RUNESTAD; REPRESENTATIVE J

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0614 Filed August 9, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOSHUA LEE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott J. Beattie, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions for murder in the first degree. AFFIRMED. Martha J. L

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

EVANDER, J. Appellant, Paul Woodson, appeals from a final judgment entered, pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of medical malpractice defendants Dr. Darlene Go, Dr. Louis Scala, and Florida Cardiology, P.A. (Ap-pellees). We affirm. In doing so, we recede from Lake v. Clark, 583 So.2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), to the extent it holds that with only very broad limits, all qualified expert opinion testimony in a medical