Cases

5 F.3d 539NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PIONEER LUMBER TREATING, INC., Pioneer Lumber & TreatingCompany of Kawaihae, Inc., and William Legg, Plaintiffs,andMark R. Thomason, Appellant.v.Burr COX,

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

974 F.Supp. 797 (1997) David R. FISCHER, Plaintiff, v. ALLIED SIGNAL CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-2198. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 4, 1997. *798 Dennis H. Sabourin, Rabner, Allcorn, Baumgart & Ben-Asher, Upper Montclair, NJ, for Plaintiff. Gregory Parliman, Pitney, Hardin,

(2008) Kenneth BLUM et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. Enno Edzards et al., Plaintiffs, v. Raytheon Company, Defendant. Ulrich Behrendt et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. and General Electric Company, Defendants. Karl-Heinz Schatz et al., Plaintiffs, v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al., Defendants. No. EP-07-CV-099-PRM. Unit

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Arline Soderbeck brought this suit under section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Robert Kellberg (the Sheriff of Burnett County, Wisconsin), the three members of the county’s Law Enforcement Committee, and the county itself. She alleges that she was fired from her job in the sheriff’s office in violation of her rights under the First Amendment, made applicable to state

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 869) PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Presently before this Court is Defendant Reliant Energy, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. # 869),1 filed on March 3, 2008. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition (Doc. # 1103) and supporting declaration (Doc. # 1104) on June

836 F.Supp. 531 (1993) Steve RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. Jerome SPRINGBORN, et al., Defendants. No. 91 C 760. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. October 20, 1993. *532 John B. Haarlow, Joseph A. Hinkhouse, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Thomas L. Ciecko, Andrew N. Levine, Chicago, IL, for defendants.

HANKINSON, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, ENOCH, SPECTOR, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, joined. In these two causes we address the correct formulation and application of the discovery rule in the latent occupational disease context. In reaching that formulation, we balance our concern that diligent plaintiffs be able to pursue meritorious

30 F.Supp.2d 1107 (1998) Shelva WARNER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, Joe Newport, individually and as its Chief of Police, and James Jenkins, individually and as Mayor of the City of Terre Haute, Defendants. No. TH 97-024-C M/F. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Terre Haute Division. December 8, 1998. *1108

ORDER COHN, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to final entry of judgment by a United States Magistrate Judge. An Order of Reference was entered by Judge James L. Foreman on May 30, 1980. Plaintiff, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary-Marion, filed a mixed habeas and Bivens action against correctional o

719 F.Supp. 683 (1989) Perrijean EAST, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Ray East, deceased, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. No. 88 C 8131. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 18, 1989. *684 James D. Montgomery, James D. Montgomery & Assoc., Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plai

416 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2005) Dr. Steven MACARTHUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:00 CV 00584 BSJ. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. June 13, 2005. *1099 *1100 *1101 *1102<

895 F.Supp. 530 (1995) Ellen BRAUNE, Juli Ann Harnett, Elizabeth Rougny, and Kathryn Sullivan Lincoln, Plaintiffs, v. The ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc., Carnrick Laboratories, Inc., Chase Chemical Co., Chromally American Corporation, Dart Industries, Inc., p/k/a Rexall Drug Co., Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., Kremers-Urban Co., n/k/a Mequon Co., Lincoln Laboratories, Inc., Mallincrodt Inc., M

605 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2009) In Re: WESTERN STATES WHOLSALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Arandell Corp., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Xcel Energy, Inc., et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1566. Nos. 2:03-CV-01431-PMP-PAL, 2:07-CV-01019-PMP-PAL. United States District Court, D. Nevada. February 26, 2009. *1124 Joshua D. Snyder, Michael J

752 F.2d 285 40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 1470 Arline M. SODERBECK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURNETT COUNTY, WISCONSIN; Robert Kellberg, individuallyand as Sheriff of Burnett County; and LowellNelson, Eugene Wellman, and Carl A.Brandenburg, Defendants-Appellees.andArline M. SODERBECK, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.BURNETT COUNTY, WISCONSIN, and Robert Kellberg, individuallyand as Sheriff of Burnett Cou