Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Beam v. Downey”
Beam v. Downeypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Beverly Beam appeals from an order entered in the District Court on April 10, 2002, granting defendants’ motions to dismiss her complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In that complaint, Beam alleges that the defendants infringed on her constitutional rights of equal protection and substantive due process, and committed various state law and antitrust vio
Beam v. Kingsleypublic domain
566 S.E.2d 437 (2002) 255 Ga. App. 715 BEAM v. KINGSLEY et al. No. A02A0656. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 11, 2002. *438 Downey & Cleveland, Y. Kevin Williams, Marietta, for appellant. Cooper & Jones, Lance A. Cooper, Scott B. Cooper, Andrew W. Jones, Marietta, for appellees. POP
OPINION NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. Judge Sylvia Rambo, of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, found plaintiff/appellant’s claim to be barred by the res judica-ta doctrine; she further concluded that the suit was frivolous, and then dismissed it. She also imposed Rule 11 sanctions on plaintiffs attorn
Beam v. Bauerpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-9-2004 Beam v. Bauer Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Downey v. Maypublic domain
Robert H. Dudley, Justice. This is a tort suit involving injuries to appellant Andrew Downey which occurred during a $4,000,000 remodeling of the Georgia-Pacific Corporation’s particle board plant at Crossett. On September 15, 1975 appellee Freddie May was operating a crane which was located just outside a wall of the plant. The roof of the building had been removed. The boom of the crane reac
Frazer v. Downeypublic domain
McInturff, J. Plaintiff appeals a jury verdict denying damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Defendant cross-appeals the denial of damages caused his vehicle in the same accident. In darkness on the morning of November 26, 1971, plaintiff’s vehicle overturned astride the north and southbound lanes of traffic on State Highway 17. The driver of plaintiff’s vehicle, Terry Rocheleau, ex
Downey v. Freypublic domain
130 N.W.2d 349 (1964) John DOWNEY, a minor, by Dorothea Downey, his mother and natural guardian, and Dorothea Downey, individually, Respondents, v. George FREY et al., Appellants. No. 39191. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 31, 1964. *350 Lasley & Foster, Minneapolis, for appellants. Murnane, Murnane, Battis & deLa
Downey v. Rymorowiczpublic domain
397 Pa. 205 (1959) Downey v. Rymorowicz, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 5, 1959. July 2, 1959. *206 Before JONES, C.J., BELL, JONES, COHEN and McBRIDE, JJ. H.G. Stutzman, with him James P. Bohorad, and Stutzman, Lewis and Sidoriak, and Houck, Bohorad and Lipkin, for appella
Bunnell v. Beampublic domain
Backes, V. C. The executor of Mary Jane Heldemore asks the advice and instruction of the court concerning the disposition- of funds in his hands. Mrs. Heldemore left a will, in which, after making some general bequests, by the fifth section gave as follows: “Fifth. As to the rest of my estate, real, personal and mixed, I hereby give, devise and bequeath unto my husband Charles Heldemore,
Wrynn v. Downeypublic domain
This case was brought to recover damages for breach of promise of marriage, and after verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000 the defendant petitions for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is against the law and the evidence, *Page 455 that the damages are excessive, and that the presiding justice erred in admitting certain evidence against the objection of the defendant and in restricting the argument of defendant's counsel. The evidence to
This is an action by appellant against appellees to recover property damage alleged to have been sustained by reason of one of appellant's trains being derailed in a collision with a trailer being operated by appellees along a highway, which trailer had become stalled upon crossing of appellant's railway tracks and a highway designated as State Highway detour No. 41. The cause was submitted to the court for trial, with the intervention of a jury, upon appellant's first paragraph of complaint
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-IA-00013-SCT RGH ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SEIED GHAFARIANPOOR AND NANCY GHAFARIANPOOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/21/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EDWIN Y. HANNAN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JOHN HINTON DOWNEY WILLIAM DRIBBEN MONTGOMERY W. WRIGHT HILL, JR. COURT FR
Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01427-SCT LESLIE GALLOWAY, III a/k/a LESLIE GALLOWAY a/k/a LESLIE “BO” GALLOWAY, III v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ANTHONY N. LAWRENCE, III NESHONDRIA DEQUANDRA ELLERBY
Travaris Richard Christian v. State of Mississippipublic domain
KITCHENS, JUSTICE, CONCURRING IN PART AND IN RESULT: ¶ 89.1 write separately because Travaris Christian was not afforded the opportunity to cross examine Dr. Adel Shaker, the forensic pathologist who conducted the autopsies of the homicide victims. Instead, the findings of Dr. Shaker, in the form of notes and photographs, were brought to the attention of the jury through the testimony of a surrogate witne
Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01427-SCT LESLIE GALLOWAY, III a/k/a LESLIE GALLOWAY a/k/a LESLIE “BO” GALLOWAY, III v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ANTHONY N. LAWRENCE, III NESHONDRIA DEQUANDRA ELLERBY
Norton v. Holcombpublic domain
682 S.E.2d 336 (2009) 299 Ga. App. 207 NORTON v. HOLCOMB. No. A09A0091. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 16, 2009. Certiorari Denied September 28, 2009. *338 William A. Neel Jr., Cartersville, for appellant. Downey & Cleveland, George L. Welborn, Mary E. Priest, Marietta, for a
Lugo v. Farmers Pride, Inc.public domain
967 A.2d 963 (2009) Luz LUGO and Yesenia Marco on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarly Situated Individuals, Appellants v. FARMERS PRIDE, INC. No. 582 Eastern District Appeal 2007. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 25, 2008. Filed January 15, 2009. Reargument Denied March 18, 2009. *9
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 310 TP 16-01391 PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF AMG MANAGING PARTNERS, LLC, MICHAEL ARONICA AND MICHAEL GIANGRECO, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, BRITTANY FRAGALE, RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS, AND JOHN SUPPA, RESPONDENT. JUSTIN S.
Middleton v. Prattpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA James B. Middleton, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 21-cv-2301 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 3, 7, 11
Jackson v. Heardpublic domain
591 S.E.2d 487 (2003) 264 Ga. App. 620 JACKSON v. HEARD. No. A03A2123. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 11, 2003. Downey & Cleveland, Joseph C. Parker, Alan J. Gibson, Marietta, for appellant. Banks, Stubbs, Neville & Cunat, Rafe Banks III, Cumming, Miles, McGoff & Moore, Larry A. Pankey, Decatur, Kevin J. McDonough, f