⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Bean v. Suthers”

Colorado Court of Appeals · 2021-08-17 · Published · cited 2× · 2021 COA 108
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
People v. Bergerudpublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008-09-18 · Published · cited 3× · 203 P.3d 579; 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1397; 2008 WL 4330262
203 P.3d 579 (2008) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allen Charles BERGERUD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06CA0013. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. September 18, 2008. Rehearing Denied October 16, 2008. *580 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Paul Koehler, Assistant Attorney General, Den
People v. Shifrinpublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014-02-27 · Published · cited 364× · 342 P.3d 506; 2014 COA 14; 2014 WL 785220; 2014 Colo. App. LEXIS 308
Opinion by JUDGE WEBB € 1 In this action under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), sections 6-1-101 to -115, C.R.S.2018, defendant, Leonid Shifrin (defendant), appeals the judgment entered against him and in favor of the State of Colorado. The Attorney General cross-appeals the directed verdict entered in favor of Mark Shifrin, defendant's father (Shifrin). Shifrin has not entered an appearance on a
Hayes v. Brunopublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016-03-21 · Published · cited 2× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 22; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35996; 2016 WL 2944525
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. #72] AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [Doc. #91] Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge Plaintiff Steven Hayes commenced this action by complaint against defendants Anthony Bruno, Edward Maldonado, Angel Quiros, Karl Lewis, Monica Rinaldi and Michael Bibens. He alleges that the defendants have denied him a kosher diet in violation
Smith v. Brucepublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2008-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 568 F. Supp. 2d 1277; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66837; 2008 WL 2939488
(2008) Emel SMITH, Plaintiff, v. L.E. BRUCE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-3146-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Emel Smith, pro se, brings suit against Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C. ("Aramark") alleging
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009-01-12 · Published · cited 21× · 199 P.3d 742; 2009 Colo. LEXIS 2; 2009 WL 60507
199 P.3d 742 (2009) DENNY CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation, Petitioner v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Colorado, acting through its BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, Respondent. No. 07SC236. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. January 12, 2009. *743 Peterson Dymond Reagor, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10391 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:07-CR-00384- REX T. HARRISON,  DAE-1 Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND AMENDED  OPINIO
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10391 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  1:07-CR-00384- DAE-1 REX T. HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 4× · 2015 COA 177
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 3× · 2015 COA 177; 378 P.3d 816; 2015 WL 9245456
Opinion by JUDGE BOORAS . 11 Plaintiff-appellant, Gold Hill Development Company, L.P. (GHDC), appeals (1) the judgment dismissing its claims against defendants-appellees, TSG Ski & Golf, LLC and TSG Asset Holdings, LLC (together referred to as TSG) and the Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel County (SMC), and
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011-12-19 · Published · cited 11× · 270 P.3d 927; 2011 Colo. LEXIS 986; 2011 WL 6318977
Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court. INDEX OF OPINION Introduction and Holding ... keer ea keke aa aka a aaa kes 931 I. ne e 932 IL. HoldiAQ salas aaa k r ee bene k den e e arn k edn a ee de ae e e ed dae ea n d ern ee es 935 A. Standard of Review. lle alr errr kaa rear kee ekle es 985 B.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
District Court, S.D. New York · 2006-07-20 · Published · cited 113× · 446 F. Supp. 2d 163; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49954; 2006 WL 2053326
446 F.Supp.2d 163 (2006) THE PENSION COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PESION PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC; Citco Fund Services (Curacao) N.V.; The Citco Group Limited; International Fund Services (Ireland) Limited; Pricewaterhousecoopers (Netherland Antilles); John W. Bendall, Jr.; Richard Geist; Anthony Stocks; Kieran Conroy; and Declan Quilligan, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9016(SAS).
Braden v. Hallpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1933-04-06 · Published · cited 0× · 21 P.2d 1094; 143 Or. 367; 1933 Ore. LEXIS 156
Action by A.E. Braden against Charles Hall to recover on an alleged contract of sale the sum of $14,200, with interest at 6 per cent from April 1, 1931. From a judgment of involuntary nonsuit in favor of the defendant, plaintiff appeals. AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. On March 12, 1931, the plaintiff and the defendant addressed a letter, hereinafter, for brevity, *Page 368 referred to as an escrow agreement, to the United States National Bank of Portl