Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Having been granted leave to pursue an interlocutory appeal, see Fed.R.CivP. 23(f), defendants challenge an order certifying a single class of plaintiffs. Relying largely on Central Bank, N.A. v. First Interstate *377Bank, N.A., 511 U.S. 164, 114 S.Ct. 1439, 128 L.Ed.2d 119 (1994), and its progeny, we reverse and r

33 Cal.Rptr.3d 644 (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 359 Daniel HORSFORD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant and Appellant. Nos. F037477, F038607. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. August 31, 2005. *648 Law Office of Dean B. Gordon, Dean B. Gordon, Sang

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,219 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHARLES A. BECK, JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Sentence recommendat

[Cite as Beck v. Beck, 2017-Ohio-1106.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STEVEN J. BECK, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2016-L-054 - vs - : JOY L. BECK,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STEVEN P. BECK, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. RICHARD N EVILLE, ET AL., Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-22-0134-PR Filed January 9, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable

Dyk, Circuit Judge. *1330 The Regents of the University of Minnesota ("UMN") appeals from decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") declining to dismiss petitions for inter partes review ("IPR"). The petitions were alleg

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BENJAMIN KOHN, No. 20-17316 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv- 04827-PJH v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; OPINION CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, and Their Agents in Their Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court

Case: 19-1205 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 05/14/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JERRY EDWARD BECK, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________ 2019-1205 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Pr

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES DAVID BECK and GERALD DEAN CRUZ, Defendants and Appellants. S029843 Alameda County Superior Court 110467-A and 110467-B December 2, 2019 Justice Liu authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Jus

Filed 12/7/18; Certified for Publication 1/2/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR ANTHONY STRATTON, B287001 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS152046) v. THOMAS E. BECK, Defendant and Appellant. AP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48475 Re: Petition for Writ of Prohibition. ) -------------------------------------------------- ) ROXANA BECK, ) ) Petitioner, )

COLLINS, J. *904This case began as a dispute over approximately $300 in unpaid wages. It has since transmogrified into a dispute concerning attorney fees totaling nearly 200 times that amount and is here now for the second time. In the previous appeal, appellant Thomas Beck challenged the trial court's award of attorney fees for work that respo

GRATTON, Judge. Richard L. Beck appeals from the district court’s intermediate appellate decision affirming the judgment entered upon Beck’s conditional guilty plea to possession of paraphernalia. Specifically, Beck challenges the denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

479 F.Supp. 392 (1979) Paul R. BECK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Commission, Melvin J. Carpenter, Individually and as Executive Director of the South Coast Regional Commission, Rocelle A. Braly, Rimmon C. Fay, Margot Feuer, Ruth Galanter, James A. Hayes, Diana Keiser, Elerth Erickson, Melvin L. Nutter, Hank Doerfling, Donald E. Wilson, Individually and as members of the South Coast Region

May, J. The former wife appeals an order modifying the time-sharing aspects of a final judgment of dissolution. She raises four issues. We find merit in her argument that the trial court erred in giving the former husband ultimate decision-making authority without specifying the areas over which the parent could exercise that authority. We therefore reverse that aspect of the order, but affirm in all other respects.

Opinion COLLINS, J. —The labor commissioner awarded respondent Anthony Stratton approximately $6,000 in unpaid wages and penalties against his *487 former employer, appellant Thomas E. Beck. Beck unsuccessfully appealed the award to the superior court under Labor Code section 98.

*1211ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Bybee and Murguia did not participate in the