Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Becker v. Volvo Cars of No. Am., LLC”
Knotts v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.public domain
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge *1316This matter is before the Court on two motions filed by Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA"): (1) a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 15] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) ; and (2) a Motion to Strike or Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Allegations [Doc. No. 21] based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision
BECKER, IV VS. BECKER, V (NRAP 5)public domain
131 Nev., Advance Opinion 85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, No. 65335 INDIVIDUALLY; ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, AND KATHLEEN BECKER, AS TRUSTEES OF THE ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, AND KATHLEEN C. BECKER FAMILY TRUST; EB FAMILY OCT 29 2015 HOLDINGS, LLC; KIMBERLY RIGGS; SALLIE BECKER; BRIAN BECKER; AND WILLIAM A. LEONARD, TRUSTEE, Ap
BECKER, IV VS. BECKER, V (NRAP 5)public domain
131 Nev., Advance Opinion 85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, No. 65335 INDIVIDUALLY; ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, AND KATHLEEN BECKER, AS TRUSTEES OF THE ERNEST A. BECKER, IV, AND KATHLEEN C. BECKER FAMILY TRUST; EB FAMILY OCT 29 2015 HOLDINGS, LLC; KIMBERLY RIGGS; SALLIE BECKER; BRIAN BECKER; AND WILLIAM A. LEONARD, TRUSTEE, Ap
Abraham v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...134 II. BACKGROUND ...134 III. THE CLASS CERTIFICATION RECORD .. .135 A. Background Regarding Ocwen’s In-House Balloon Loan Modifications and its Documentation Systems ... 135 B. The Class Representatives ... 136 1. Plaintiffs Li
Blue v. District of Columbia Public Schoolspublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. PILLARD, Circuit Judge: Robert Weismiller, a 57-year-old teacher at a public high school for emotionally disturbed teens, started a sexual relationship with his 18-year-old student, Ayanna Blue, in the fall of 2008. Weismiller had been fired repeatedly from other area schools for inappropriate sexual contac
Lester v. FCA US, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Lester v. FCA US, L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1776.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO DEREK LESTER, : APPEAL NOS. C-210532 C-210536 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- : TRIAL NO. A-1804511 Appellant, : vs.
Reynaldo Reyes v. Netdepositpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Chief Judge. Reynaldo Reyes appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion to certify a class to sue for alleged civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), (d). The defendants are Zions First National Bank (“Zions Bank”) and its payment-processor subsidiaries,
Waldner v. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc.public domain
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. Multiple defendant move to dismiss plaintiffs claims against them pursuant to various sections Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 56. Plaintiff, Roger D. Waldner, resists. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The general, pertinent facts to this order, in the light most favorable to Waldner, the non-moving party, are as follows: In 2002, Wald
United Food & Commercial Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.)public domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Drug manufacturer Warner Chilcott Limited pulled one of its products-Asacol-from the market just months before the drug's patent protection expired. Warner simultaneously introduced a similar but not exactly identical substitute drug called Delzicol, the patent protection for which ran years longer. This coordinated withdrawal and entry of the two drugs alleged
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Coynepublic domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Scott Feinerman, United States District Judge Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation brought this suit against John Coyne, Allen Mondo, Rachel Yackley, Peter Garcia, and Kenny Seidman, alleging unauthorized use and display of Slep-Tone’s Sound Choice trademarks in violation of §§ 32 and 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U'.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125, and the Illinois Deceptive Trade
United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Mark Ciavarella, a former state judge, was convicted by a jury in the Middle District of Pennsylvania of racketeering, honest services mail fraud, money laundering conspiracy, filing false tax returns, and several other related crimes. The charges resulted from the so-called “Kids for Cash” scandal that erupted in L
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Judge Rubin has wryly observed that “brevity may be wit’s soul, but it is no part of patent litigation.” Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co., 301 F.Supp. 1037 (E.D.La.1969). The same may be said of intellectual property cases generally. Thus, ADC’s 3½ page motio
In Re Ditropan XL Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
529 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2007) In re DITROPAN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Order Relates to: All Cases. No. M:06-CV-01761-JSW, MDL No. 1761. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 11, 2007. *1099 Anne K. Mandt, Charfoos & Christensen, P.C., Detroit, MI, Gregory P. Sautter, Timothy J. Becker, Zimmerman Reed PLLP, Minneapol
MEMORANDUM PRATTER, District Judge. This multidistrict litigation poses the question: If a tree falls in the forest, was it caused by DuPont’s herbicide, Imprelis? Rather than squarely answer that question, the parties reached a class action settlement after months of negotiation, and the Court preliminarily approved that settlement in February of 2013. In the months that followed, the parties eng
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice. [Doc. 94.] Plaintiffs filed an opposition, [Doc. No. 107], and Defendants fi