Cases

SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: The district court ruled that the United States is without a common-law right to indemnification from student borrowers who default on loans guaranteed under the Federal Insured Student Loan Program, Tit. IV-B of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. § 1071 et seq. Neither the

FRUGÉ, Judge. This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with the case of Dies v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al, 208 So.2d 714 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968). This case arises out of collisions involving a dragline carried on a lowboy trailer, a pick-up truck, and a Pontiac automobile. The primary defendants in this case, as well as in the case consolidated herewith, are: Louis Larive, the drive

BRITTANY CAVET * NO. 2024-C-0428 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ABC INSURANCE COMPANY * AND MAISON ST. CHARLES, FOURTH CIRCUIT LLC * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE C

[Cite as State v. Hornbuckle, 2022-Ohio-2025.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARQUISE HORNBUCKLE, Defendant-Appellant.

[Cite as State v. Carter, 2022-Ohio-3787.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREG EUGENE CARTER, Defendant-Appellan

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. SHONDELL Q. RATEREE Docket: SJC-13599 Dates: October 11, 2024 - April 8, 2025 Present:

Getty, J. In this case, we are asked to determine whether a defendant charged with misdemeanors by information, in circuit court, is entitled to a preliminary hearing pursuant to § 4-102 of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”) of the Maryland Code. For the following reasons, we answer in the negative and hold that CP § 4-102 provid

Judgment rendered August 10, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,574-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** EDDRINA WOODARD

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-14 SABRATHIA DRAINE ISHAKWUE, APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF CO

Scott Wadsworth, et al. v. Poornima Sharma, et al., No. 40, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Getty, C.J. WRONGFUL DEATH — LOSS OF CHANCE DOCTRINE — CAUSATION The Court of Appeals held that a party who brings a wrongful death action under Md. Code (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-902(a) as the result of alleged medical malpractice bears the burden of proving that the alleged malpractice proximately caused the decedent’s death. Circuit Court for Baltimore Coun

74 So.3d 1258 (2011) Waymon Derek JONES, et ux. v. BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY, et al. No. 11-418. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 5, 2011. *1259 David A. Hughes, Hughes & LaFleur, Alexandria, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Brookshire Grocery Company. Gary Paul Koederitz, Koederitz Law Firm, LLC, Baton

3. Qualified Immunity - Individual Capacity Claims As discussed above, Plaintiff failed to address the DA's individual liability under the Equal Protection Clause, the only viable federal constitutional claim asserted, in her Opposition memoranda, although she presented argument on this issue at the oral argument.131 Plaintiff's only Opposition response to the DA's assertion of qualifi

Scott Wadsworth, et al. v. Poornima Sharma, et al., No. 40, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Getty, C.J. WRONGFUL DEATH — LOSS OF CHANCE DOCTRINE — CAUSATION The Court of Appeals held that a party who brings a wrongful death action under Md. Code (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-902(a) as the result of alleged medical malpractice bears the burden of proving that the alleged malpractice proximately caused the decedent’s death. Circuit Court for Baltimore Coun

OPINION Newell, J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. Appellant, Joe Edward LaRue, was convicted in a bench trial of the capital murder of Donna Pentecost and sentenced to life imprisonment. His conviction was based in part on DNA evidence and in part on the very detailed testimony of a jailhouse informant. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Appellant filed a motion for forensic DNA

Scott Wadsworth, et al. v. Poornima Sharma, et al., No. 40, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Getty, C.J. WRONGFUL DEATH — LOSS OF CHANCE DOCTRINE — CAUSATION The Court of Appeals held that a party who brings a wrongful death action under Md. Code (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-902(a) as the result of alleged medical malpractice bears the burden of proving that the alleged malpractice proximately caused the decedent’s death. Circuit Court for Baltimore Coun

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 575 MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Jessie Medina of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to deliver and sentenced him to thirty-five years' imprisonment. Medina raises one issue in this appeal: that the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction. W

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

Karunaker Aleti, et ux. v. Metropolitan Baltimore, LLC, et al., No. 459, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Fader, C.J. LANDLORD AND TENANT — LOCAL LICENSING ORDINANCE — FAILURE TO LICENSE RENTAL PROPERTY — PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION Article 13, § 5-4(a)(2) of the Baltimore City Code, which prohibits a landlord from charging, accepting, retaining, or seeking to collect rent for a rental property unless the property is properly licensed, does not provide tenants with a private right of action to col

State of Maryland v. Keith Krikstan, No. 18, September Term, 2022 CHILD ABUSE – SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR – ACT THAT INVOLVES SEXUAL EXPLOITATION – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – Supreme Court of Maryland* held that evidence was sufficient to support substitute teacher’s conviction for child sexual abuse based on teacher’s in-school discussion with minor about teacher’s anger or jealousy over minor’s affection for another adult man amidst teacher’s ongoing sexual exploitation of minor outside of s

Eric Antonio Alarcon-Ozoria v. State of Maryland, No. 4, September Term 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – DISCOVERY – MANDATORY DISCLOSURE The Court of Appeals held that the scope of the mandatory obligation of the State to disclose materials to the defense without request does not extend to materials held by a state correctional facility, which is not within the ambit of control by the State, does not regularly report to the State’s Attorney, and did not report to the State’s Attorne