Cases

73 So.3d 1145 (2011) Scott HARRISON and Mona Harrison v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF the CITY OF BATESVILLE and Memphis Stone & Gravel Company. No. 2009-CT-00981-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 3, 2011. *1147 Paul B. Watkins, Jr., Pope S. Mallette, Oxford, attorneys for appellants. Benjamin E. Griffith,

73 So.3d 1169 (2011) Scott HARRISON and Mona Harrison, Appellants v. MAYOR & BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF the CITY OF BATESVILLE and Memphis Stone & Gravel Company, Appellees. No. 2009-CA-00981-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. October 26, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 22, 2011. Paul Bowie Watkins Jr., Pope Shannon Mallette, Oxford, attorneys for

USCA11 Case: 24-11310 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 11/10/2025 Page: 1 of 71 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11310 ____________________ BENJAMIN WATSON, JR.,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JILL HARRISON CURRINGTON a/k/a BRENDA JILL CURRINGTON, and JOAN HARRISON NOSS a/k/a MARGARET JOAN NOSS, Appellants, v. ROGERS, MORRIS, AND ZIEGLER, LLP, a Florida limited liability company, CAROLYN KALAGHER f/k/a CAROLYN MAINES HARRISON, as Trustee under the Benjamin F. Harrison, Jr., Revocable Trust Agree

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CT-00981-SCT SCOTT HARRISON AND MONA HARRISON v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF THE CITY OF BATESVILLE AND MEMPHIS STONE & GRAVEL COMPANY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/13/2009 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANDREW C. BAKER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PANOLA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JILL HARRISON CURRINGTON a/k/a BRENDA JILL CURRINGTON and JOAN HARRISON NOSS a/k/a MARGARET JOAN NOSS, Appellants, v. MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; CAROLYN KALAGHER f/k/a CAROLYN MAINES HARRISON, as Trustee under the BENJAMIN F. HARRISON, JR. REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT, DATED MARCH 26, 1999; CAROLYN KAL

Appellate Case: 19-2197 Document: 010110678995 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 3, 2022

Appellate Case: 19-2197 Document: 010110678978 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 3, 2022

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0103p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ALANA HARRISON, individually and on behalf of all │ others similarly situat

Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Presidential Management Fellows Program. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Pro se plaintiff Nicholas Harrison 1 filed a complaint in this court. As the basis for th

Present: All the Justices DON SCOTT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY v. Record No. 260127 MAY 8, 2026 RYAN T. MCDOUGLE, VIRGINIA STATE SENATOR, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TAZEWELL COUNTY On March 6, 2026, the General Assembly of Virginia submitted to Virginia vo

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS John A. Rizzo, Jr., Mary Frances Rizzo Wright, FILED Melanie Rizzo Cavalier and Johnna Maria Rizzo, May 17, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Plaintiffs Below, Petitioners SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Arnold Harrison, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner FILED April 12, 2016 vs) No. 15-0381 (Kanawha County 14-C-1154) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Benjamin Salas, Jr. was charged in a two-count indictment with possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of actual methamphetamine (count 1), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and for using, carrying and possessing a firearm during and in relation to drug trafficking (count 2), in vio

BENJAMIN, J., concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part: I write separately to reiterate my dissent in State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automo*532bile Insurance Company v. Bedell, 228 W.Va. 252, 719 S.E.2d 722 (2011) (“Bedell II”). As with the protective order at issue in Bedell II,

376 S.C. 2 (2007) 656 S.E.2d 17 J. Samuel COAKLEY, individually and as Trustee of a Special Needs Trust for Christian Coakley, Respondent v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE CO., Scott Andrew Mitchell, Christopher N. Mitchell and Claudia Dee Dee Mitchell, Petitioners. No. 26407. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 31, 2007. Decided Decem

OPINION OF THE COURT WILLIAM F. SMITH, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in this action sought a declaratory judgment that Claim 4 of Reissue Patent No. 23,547 and Design Patent No. 173,694 were invalid and not infringed. The defendants counterclaimed for damages and the usual injunctive relief. On a motion, file

* * * * * * * * * * * The undersigned have reviewed the record and the prior Decision and Order filed by Deputy Commissioner Garner. The appealing party has not shown good ground to amend the Decision and Order. The Full Commission hereby AFFIRMS the decision of the Deputy Commissioner. * * * * * * * * * * * Defendant's objection to the inclusion in the record of the attachment to plaintiffs' 2nd

Judge Duffy wrote the opinion, in which Judge Floyd and Chief Judge Seymour concurred. Order PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior District Judge. This matter was tried without a jury beginning on March 1, 2012. The Court— having heard the arguments, read the submissions of counsel, and considered the evidence, including courtroom testimony, deposition testimony, affidavit testimony, a

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20