Cases

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. WILKINS, Circuit Judge: In multiple respects, these appeals concern the duties owed to the court by lawyers and their legal teams. Appellants are a criminal defense attorney and two legal investigators who were convicted in 2012 of breaching those duties by fabricating evi

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a putative class action brought by consumers from six states alleging that Appellants-Defendants Volvo Cars of North America, LLC and Volvo Car Corporation (collectively “Volvo”) sold certain vehicles with defective sunroof drainage systems. Volvo challenges the grant of class certification by the U.S. D

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc. and Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. (collectively, "Huawei") and defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Research America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung") are major players in the world of wireless telecommunications-a world gov

675 S.E.2d 345 (2009) WAKE CARES, INC.; Patrice Lee, individually and as guardian ad litem of her minor children, Ian Lee, Delaney Lee, Margaret Lee, and Bailey Lee; Kathleen Brennan, individually and as guardian ad litem of her minor child, ELIZABETH Brennan; Scott P. Haviland and Gihan I. El-Habbal, individually and as guardians ad litem of their children, Ahmed Haviland, Ayah Haviland, and Iman Haviland; Michael John Stanton and Angela Marie Stanton,

Defendant Wake County Board of Education ("the Board") appeals from the trial court's order concluding that the Board "lacks the statutory authority to convert traditional calendar schools to mandatory year round schools," but ruling that the Board "is authorized by law to operate, ona voluntary consensual basis, year round calendar schools," so long as it obtains "informed parental consent."1 (Emph

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1903 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WILLIE RICHARD MINOR, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] B

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MINGNAN DONG, No. 16-70543 Petitioner, Agency No. A205-1

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4736 Doc: 105 Filed: 09/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 50 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4735 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IZZAT FREITEKH, Defendant - Ap

DAVIS, Acting Chief Justice: The Appellants herein and defendants below, A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., and various of its subsidiaries, appeal from a March 15, 2005, order entered in the Circuit Court of Boone County, which denied their post-judgment motions for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, or remittitur, in response to the entry of a judgment of more than $50 million in favor of the appellees herein, and plaint

479 F.Supp.2d 805 (2007) Denise SOBILO f/k/a Iman Seleman, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence S. MANASSA, Riffner, Barber, Rowden & Scott, LLC., a law firm, and Thomas M. Gurewitz, Defendants. No. 06 C 543. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 16, 2007. *806 *807

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Fall 2024 Term FILED ____________________________ December 12, 2024 released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK No. 23-ICA-409 I

DAVIS, Justice: The Appellants herein and defendants below, A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., and various of its subsidiaries, appeal from a March 15, 2005, order entered in the Circuit Court of Boone County, which denied their post-judgment motions for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, or remittitur, in response to the entry of a judgment of more than $50 million in favor of the appellees herein, and plaintiffs below,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MERION CAPITAL L.P. and MERION ) CAPITAL II L.P., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9320-VCL ) LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

[Cite as State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-5412.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114872 v. : IMAN DAVIS, :

Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-22-2002 USA v. Cohen Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Kottmyer, J. Introduction Plaintiffs, Rahim Rashad, Rahim Rasheed Abubardar and Dana Charles are Muslims who are prisoners in the custody of the Department of Correction (“DOC”).1 Defendants are Michael Maloney, Commissioner of DOC, and Peter Pepe, former superintendent of MCI-Shirley. The plaintiffs allege, inter alia, violations of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-18-2004 Ramirez v. Comm Social Security Precedential o

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-26-2003 USA v. Hakim Precedential or Non-Precedential:

676 F.3d 19 (2012) VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YOUTUBE, INC., YouTube, LLC, Google, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. The Football Association Premier League Limited, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bourne Co., Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.,

211 F.Supp.2d 91 (2002) Dvir UNGAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-2606(JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 26, 2002. *92 David Strachman, McIntyre, Tate, Lynch & Holt, Providence, RI, for Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION