Cases

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

SUMMERS, J. Dissenting. ¶ 1 The Court concludes that the bond issue does not satisfy Article 10 § 16 of the Oklahoma Constitution because the “purpose” of the funds is not set forth with specificity. I respectfully dissent from that conclusion. The Oklahoma Constitution contains two provisions that require a law to specify the purpose for which public money is spent: Okla. Const. Art 10 § 16 (borrowed funds), and

67 Cal.Rptr.3d 635 (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 809 Mohammad KASHMIRI et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Appellant. No. A113662. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two. November 2, 2007. As Modified November 15, 2007. *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–0356 Filed January 16, 2015 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF STEVEN MICHAEL GUST AND LINDA LEANN GUST Upon the Petition of STEVEN MICHAEL GUST, Appellant, And Concerning LINDA LEANN GUST, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert B. Hanson, Judge. An ex-spouse seeks further review of a court

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

366 B.R. 908 (2007) In re Mark Allen JESPERSON, Debtor. Mark Allen Jesperson, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Department of Education; National Student Loan Program, Inc.; Account Control Technology, Inc.; United Student Aid Funds, Inc.; GC Services; General Revenue Corp.; Educational Resources Institute, Inc. (Teri); Arrow Financial Services LLC; Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corp.; OSI Education Services, Inc.; Diversified Collection Services, I

807 F.2d 657 36 Ed. Law Rep. 569 Kalima JENKINS, by her next friend, Kamau AGYEI, et al.,Appellants/Appellees,andAmerican Federation of Teachers, Local 691, Appellant/Appellee,v.The STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., Appellants/Appellees,Park Hill School District R-5 and Dr. Merlin A. Ludwig,Superintendent thereof, et al., Appellees. Nos. 85-1765, 85-1949, 85-1974 and 85-207

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–0356 Filed January 16, 2015 Amended March 27, 2015 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF STEVEN MICHAEL GUST AND LINDA LEANN GUST Upon the Petition of STEVEN MICHAEL GUST, Appellant, And Concerning LINDA LEANN GUST, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert B. Hanson, Judge.

Dooley, J. In this declaratory judgment action, we are again called upon to consider the constitutional implications of the Vermont statutes authorizing school districts to provide high school education to their students by paying tuition for nonpublic schools selected by their parents. See 16 V.S.A. §§ 822 and 824. In Campbell v. Manchester Board of School Directors, 161 Vt. 441, 641 A.2d 352 (1994), we concluded that t

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1156 Filed November 26, 2014 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF LONNIE J. MAYNES AND CATHY MAYNES Upon the Petition of LONNIE J. MAYNES, Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, And Concerning CATHY MAYNES, Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Taylor County, Sherman W.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12274 GEORGE CAPLAN & others1 vs. TOWN OF ACTON. Middlesex. Se

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

WERDEGAR, J., Dissenting. This case requires that we resolve a dispute between the Legislature and a charter city, two entities granted specific lawmaking authority by our state Constitution. On the one hand, “[t]he legislative power of this State is vested in the California Legislature which consists of the Senate and Assembly . . . .” (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 1.) The state Legislature wields “the entire law-making authority of t

Justice Kennedy, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice ScALiAjoin, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. In agreement with the Court that we have jurisdiction to decide this case, I join Parts I and II of the opinion. I agree also that the District Court exceeded its authority by attempting to impose a tax. The Court is unanimous in its holding, that the Court of Appeals’ ju

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. This case arises from claims of unconstitutional racial segregation of school children in the Kansas City metropolitan area. After trial, the district court1 imposed an intradistrict remedy against the Kansas City, Missouri School District (KCMSD) and the State of Missouri with the State bearing approximately three-fourths of the cost. The district court found that

OPINION FOX, Chief Judge. This action challenges the sick/disability leave provisions of various school districts in the State of Michigan, insofar as those provisions treat pregnancy in a different manner from any other temporary disability. Plaintiffs seek to sue under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as well as 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 2000e et seq., and 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et s

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 5514413 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS