⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Bernadine Wiggins”

People v. Youngpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 8774
People v Young (2018 NY Slip Op 08774) People v Young 2018 NY Slip Op 08774 Decided on December 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Bates v. Hillpublic domain
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995-06-05 · Published · cited 0×
Mr. H. Ligon Bundy, counsel for plaintiff Vivian Moore Wiggins has appealed the attorney's fees portion of the 2 February 1995 Order Approving Compromise Settlement Agreement filed by Deputy Commissioner Hedrick. The fee agreement between Mr. Bundy and Ms. Moore called for a twenty (20) percent attorney's fee if the case was settled prior to hearing. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Ms. Moore received a total of $19,000.00, and (20%) of that amount is $3,800.00. However,
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Deluca and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002-03-13 · Published · cited 6× · 42 P.3d 359; 180 Or. App. 181; 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 402; 2002 WL 387233
42 P.3d 359 (2002) 180 Or. App. 181 In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Bernadine Angela MENARD, Respondent, and Raymond Thomas Menard, aka Raymond Thomas Menard, III, Appellant, and Amber Rae Menard, Third-Party Respondent. C89-1024DR; A113218 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 13, 2001. Decided March 13, 2002.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Pamela T. Young and the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has shown good ground in part to reconsider the evidence. Having reconsidered the entire evidence of record, the Full Commission modifies in part and affirms in part the Deputy Commissioners holding and enters the following Opinion and Award. ***
State v. Mingopublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-09-27 · Published · cited 35× · 244 So. 3d 629
COX, J. The defendant, Nathaniel Allen Mingo ("Mingo"), was charged with second degree murder, in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1, for the March 15, 2015, shooting of his girlfriend, Amanda Collins ("Collins"). Mingo filed a notice of intent to present a defense of intoxication pursuant to La. R.S. 14:15(2). The jury was instructed on the law of this defense, but ultimately found Mingo guilty as charged. A pro se motion for new trial
Styers v. Housepublic domain
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the foll
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 46× · 830 F.3d 107; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13226
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams