Cases

Martha Hill Jamison, Justice This State's appeal arises from the trial court's suppression of evidence obtained during a warrantless stop and blood alcohol test results in the prosecution of appellee Albert Tyrone Bernard for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. It comes to us on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See State v. Bernard ,

BROWN, Justice. Appellant was acquitted of a charge of second-degree murder. He presented a bill of costs for his expenses, including subpoena fees, witness fees, reporting fees, and exhibit expenses. The trial court, after a hearing on the matter of costs, determined that it had no authority to grant costs to an acquitted defendant who was not indigent. This is an appeal from the order denying costs to appellant.

BERNARD SINGLETON, * NO. 2023-CA-0295 D.V.M., M.S. * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * DILLARD UNIVERSITY FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: *1293 This appeal requires us to decide whether the district court misinterpreted our mandate in an earlier appeal and misapplied the defense of fair use,

Opinion by JUDGE J. JONES 11 In 2011, the Douglas County Board of Education (County Board) adopted the Choice Scholarship Program (CSP). Pursuant to the CSP, parents of eligible elementary school, middle school, and high school students residing in the Douglas County School District (District) may choose to have their children attend certain private schools, including some with religions affiliation. The Dist

430 F.2d 721 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John Albert BAKEWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27715. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 7, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 27, 1970. David S. Yost, Lawrence J. Robinson, Sarasota, Fla.,

752 F.Supp.2d 670 (2010) Gesele JONES v. KOONS AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al. Civil Action No. DKC 09-3362. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 5, 2010. *674 Bernard Thomas Kennedy, The Kennedy Law Firm, Edgewater, MD, Thomas Joseph Minton, Goldman and Minton PC, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Joseph M. Creed, Jos

407 Pa. 97 (1962) Wheatcroft, Appellant, v. Albert Company. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 17, 1961. April 17, 1962. *98 Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN and ALPERN, JJ. Harry L. Rossi, with him Maurice M. Green, for appellants. Robert K. Greenfield, with him B

902 F.2d 1558 Alexander (Fred), Altizer (Aubrey), Balog (Michael),Broadwater (David), Brunskill (Robert), Caro (Silvio),Cisneros (Manuel), Concannon (Brian), Deluca (Eugene), Derr(Bernard), Duffy (Walter), Egonopoulos (Abraham), Eppler(Frank, Jr.), Genthert (Albert), Goslin (Robert, Mr.),Grazer (Chris), Gredone (George), Hills (Thomas E.), Jackson(Robert), Janik (E.), Jankowski (Stanley), Jones (W.B.),Jordan (Steven), Ke

581 F.3d 275 (2009) Monica CASTRO, For Herself and as Next Friend of R.M.G., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-40416. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 28, 2009. Susan Leigh Watson (argued), Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Nashville, TN, Javier N. Maldonado, San Antonio, TX, for Castro. Eric Fleisig-Gr

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Walter L. Jones, pro se (“Jones”), and the Walter L. Jones Development Corp. (“the Corporation”), appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, John T. Elfvin, Judge, dismissing appellants’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C). Judge Elfvin dismissed the action because of Jones’

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Bustamante appeals his conviction and sentence on two counts of a ten count indictment charging RICO and related offenses. We affirm. I. Albert G. Bustamante was elected to the United States House of Representatives in November 1984 and served until his defeat in 1992. In 1993, a federal grand jury

312 F.3d 341 P.A.C.E., Movant-Appellant,Chinyere Jenkins, by her next friend, Joi Jenkins, Nicholas Paul Winchester-Rabelier, by his next friend, Paua Winchester, Margo Vaughn-Bey, by her next friend, Franklin Vaughn-Bey, Nicholas C. Light, by his next friend, Marian Light, Stephon D. Jackson, by his next friend, B.J. Jones, Travis N. Peter, by his next friend, Deborah Chadd-Peter, Leland Guess, by his next friend, Sharon Guess, Plaintiffs-Appe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-01063-SCT ALBERT N. FERRER, JR. v. JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND WILLIAM E. HOLLOWAY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/07/97 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILL JONES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JERRY L. HUTCHERSON

112 Ill. App.2d 79 (1969) 250 N.E.2d 829 Albert C. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. S.S. and E. Corporation, Defendant, and Robert P. Tonietto, Defendant-Appellant. Robert P. Tonietto, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dave Gambino, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Gen. No. 51,972. Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Fourth Division. June 11

KING, Justice, dissenting. ¶ 23. I dissent from the plurality opinion herein. ¶ 24. In the trial court, this products liability case resulted in a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court then granted the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), holding that the plaintiffs’ proof failed to meet the frequency, regularity, and prox

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. Before us is a petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States, reported at 34 T.C. 20. The petitioners are husband and wife who filed joint returns on the cash basis for the taxable years 1952 and 1953. The husband, Albert Gordon MacRae, will hereinafter be called the taxpayer. The Tax Court sustained the

982 F.Supp. 515 (1997) Karl HASSELL, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Nos. C2-94-242, C2-94-747. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 26, 1997. *516 James Bernard Blumenstiel, Blumenstiel Huhn Woods Adams & Hemmer, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiffs. William K.

636 So.2d 1112 (1994) Priscilla JONES, Wife of Warren Edward Rome v. Wayne TRAILOR, et al. No. 93-CA-2144. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 28, 1994. *1114 Ivan David Warner, III, Carimi Law Firm, Metairie, and Glenn E. Diaz, Chalmette, for plaintiff, appellee. Salvador E. Gutierrez, Jr., Mary Ann Hand,

COMPTON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in chancery, in which we determine whether the trial court properly denied rescission of leases of sand and gravel mining rights. In 1981, appellants C. T. Neale, Jr., June E. Neale, Martha Snead Neale, C. T. Neale, III, Mary W. Neale, Albert E. Neale, and William E. Neale, filed a bill of comp