Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 44036 STELLA WATKINS, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of ARTHUR ) DONALD WATKINS, ) ) Plaintiff-Counterdefendant- ) Respondent, ) ) and ) STEVEN G. NEIGHBORS, a

OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. The State appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed by. Ashley Beth Gammill. The case hinges on whether the Transportation Code section setting forth a driver’s duty to display headlights should be construed to be in the conjunctive or the disjunctive. That section state

211 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2001) BETH B. and Susan and Tom B., individually and as next friends of Beth B., Plaintiffs, v. Mark VAN CLAY, individually and in his official capacity as superintendent, and Lake Bluff School District No. 65, Defendants. No. 00 C 4771. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 10, 2001.

126 F.Supp.2d 532 (2000) BETH B. and Susan and Tom B., individually and as next friends of Beth B., Plaintiffs, v. Mark VAN CLAY, individually and in his official capacity as superintendent, and Lake Bluff School District # 65, Defendants. No. 00 C 4771. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 24, 2000. *53

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Thirteen-year-old Beth B. and her parents appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Lake Bluff School District, affirming an administrative decision that upheld the school district’s recommendation to place Beth in a special education classroom. Beth is severely mentally and physically challenged. Her parents have long been fighting a battle

OPINION Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice Trudy Jane Schuetze Sundín appeals the trial court’s order denying her application for a temporary injunction in the underlying probate proceeding. In her sole issue on appeal, Trudy contends the trial court abused its discretion because she alleged a viable cause of action for

OPINION Opinion on Second Motion for Rehearing Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice On August 24, 2016, in response to ap-pellee Tidal Petroleum, Inc.’s motion for rehearing, we withdrew our May 11, 2016 opinion and judgment and substituted a clarified opinion and judgment. Thereafter, Tidal filed a second

OPINION Opinion by Justice Rodriguez Appellant Dos Repúblicas Coal Partnership (Dos Repúblicas) challenges the order of the 293rd District Court of Maverick County denying its petition for writ of mandamus to compel appellees David Sau-cedo, as Floodplain Administrator and County Judge of the Maverick County Commissioners Court, and

OPINION GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice. In this breach-of-eontract action between STR Constructors, Ltd. (STR), a general contractor, and Newman Tile, Inc. (NTI), a subcontractor, the trial court rendered judgment for NTI and against STR and its insurer, Arch Insurance Co (Arch). In six issues, STR and Arch appeal from the trial court’s judgment,

*585 OPINION Opinion by: Jason Pulliam, Justice This appeal arises from disputes pertaining to Appellant Kirsten Q.’s petition and Appellee Scott S.’s counterpetition to modify the parent-child relationship established by divorce decree in 2008

JAMES T. CAMPBELL, Justice, concurring and dissenting. The court affirms the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Cuahu-temoc (“Tim”) Gonzalez on Samuel Lee Jackson’s claim based on, the allegation of negligent loading of the tandem truck. I join in the affirmance of summary judgment on that claim, and in the parts of the court’s opinion addressing it.

320 Ga. 862 FINAL COPY S24A1187. WATKINS v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. Roderick Watkins was convicted of malice murder and other crimes related to the March 14, 2012 shooting death of Ashley Clark and her unborn child.1 On appeal, Watkins alleges four evidentiary 1 On June 8, 2012, a Fulton County grand jury indicted Watkins for murder; felony murder predicated on aggravated assault; feticide; aggravated assault with a deadly weapon; three counts o

OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice Four parties to a joint operating agreement sued the operator and others seeking to recover sums they claim were owed from the production of an oil and gas well. The plaintiffs allege that the well was completed by means of a “subsequent operation,” in which they elected not to participate. According to the plaintiffs, charges for the use of the wellbore should no

OPINION Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice This appeal involves a dispute between two clients and their two attorneys over a written contingent fee contract and an oral fee-sharing agreement in an oil and gas case. In that case, the attorneys obtained a settlement for the clients. Then, the clients sued the attorneys; t

350 S.W.3d 130 (2011) In the ESTATE OF Wilbur Waldo LYNCH, Deceased. No. 04-09-00777-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. April 20, 2011. *132 Beth Watkins Squires, Law Office of Beth Squires, San Antonio, TX, for Appellant. Ellen B. Mitchell, Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, San Antonio, TX, for Appellee.

345 S.W.3d 624 (2011) Wade P. FITZGERALD and Minot Tully Pratt, IV and Michael G. Panzarella, as Trustee of the MTPIV Trust and Cinco Family Trust, Appellants, v. SCHROEDER VENTURES II, LLC, Appellee. No. 04-10-00371-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. April 6, 2011. *626 Beth Watkins Squires, Law Office of Beth Squires,

OPINION Opinion by: STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice. Jason Daniel Watts appeals a final divorce decree incorporating a jury’s finding that Adrian Jean Watts should be appointed as the sole managing conservator of their two children. Jason asserts the trial court erred by: (1) failing to provide the jury with further instructions in response to

OPINION Opinion by: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice. This is the second appeal considered by this court in relation to a will contest involving the Estate of Wilbur Waldo Lynch. In the first appeal, this court upheld the jury’s verdict that: (1) Waldo lacked testamentary capacity and was unduly influenced when he executed a will in 20

OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. Appellee, Doud Media Group, L.L.C., purchased a radio transmitter from appellant, Superior Broadcast Products. Doud Media experienced problems with the transmitter and, later, filed this suit against Superior. Doud Media alleged, among other things, that the transmitter was defective and that Superior breached an expres

OPINION Opinion by: REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice. Rachel Deakyne was injured in an automobile accident involving a patrol car driven by Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) Trooper Kavin Edwards. Deakyne sued Edwards and DPS for negligence. The trial court granted DPS’s motion to dismiss Edwards but denied DPS’s motion to dismiss Deakyne’s suit against DP