⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Bethel v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP”

Supreme Court of Georgia · 2025-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 321 Ga. 854
321 Ga. 854 FINAL COPY S24G1104. WALMART STORES EAST, LP v. LEVERETTE. PINSON, Justice. At common law, juries would routinely award “nominal dam- ages” to a plaintiff who proved the violation of her legal rights but failed to prove any amount of actual damages with enough certainty. These nominal damages were widely understood to be only a “trivial sum,” important for the fact of the award but not meaningful as an amount. In England, that sum was often a shilling (equivalen
Leeper v. Asmuspublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 1× · 440 S.W.3d 478; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 605; 2014 WL 2190966
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge. This case involves a claim of co-employee liability for a workplace injury which occurred between the 2005 and 2012 amendments of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”). Skyler Leeper (“Leeper”) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his amended petition for- failure to state a claim. Leeper’s amended petition alleged that co-employee Andy Asmus (“Asmus”) breached a personal duty of care owed to L
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District SKYLER LEEPER, ) ) Appellant, ) WD76772 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: May 27, 2014 ) ANDY ASMUS,
District Court, N.D. New York · 2012-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 895 F. Supp. 2d 321; 2012 WL 3999763; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129251
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. Currently pending before the Court, in this civil rights action filed by Leroy M. Douglas Corporation of Silver Lake (“Plaintiffs”) against the New York State Adirondack Park Agency and six of its employees (“APA Defendants”),1 the Adirondack Council, Inc., and two of its members (“AC Defendants”),
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014-03-27 · Published · cited 97× · 438 Md. 451; 92 A.3d 400; 2014 WL 1569286; 2014 Md. LEXIS 166
HARRELL, J. Table of Contents ** I. Background Facts..................................474 II. The Procedural Path of the Present Case ............483 III. Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss the A
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS