Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CT-01230-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EZELL “BOGGIE” a/k/a “BOOGIE” THOMAS, DECEASED: SHARON HALEY, JANNIE COLLINS, DERICK THOMAS, ERIC THOMAS, TIMOTHY THOMAS, LYNN VALLIAN, DEZIE HALEY, GAYLE HALEY, DEMETRIA MURRY, JIMMY DALE DIXON, RAY JOSEPH FOUNTAIN, DELANIOUS GRINNELL AND MARION OLIVER v. GLENDA JOYCE THOMAS, ADMINISTRATRIX ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT:

August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA

RENDERED: AUGUST 7, 2026; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2025-CA-0648-MR DANA HAL MADDOX; ALYSSIA NOELLE MADDOX; AND KIMBERLY ANN MADDOX APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM JACKSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE OSCAR G. HOUSE, JUDGE ACTION NO. 23-CI-00086 BERNI

Moyer, C.J. In 1996, in an effort to protect the public, the General Assembly repealed and reenacted Ohio’s sex offender registration statute. See Am.Sub. H.B. No. 180, 146 Ohio Laws, Part II, 2560 (“H.B. 180”). The General Assembly concluded that “[sjexual predators and habitual sex offenders pose a high risk of engaging in further offenses even after being released from imprisonment.” R.C.

PETERS, J. 1!Acme Land Company, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment recognizing Todd Morein and Sandra Stagg Morein as owners of a disputed tract of immovable property in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, based on ten years acquisitive prescription. For the following reasons, we reverse the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Moreins, render judgment granting the motion for partial summary judgment in favor

73 F.3d 819 106 Ed. Law Rep. 99 Michael C. LIDDELL, a minor, by Minnie LIDDELL, his motherand next friend; Kendra Liddell, a minor, by MinnieLiddell, her mother and next friend; Minnie Liddell;Roderick D. LeGrand, a minor by Lois LeGrand, his mother andnext friend; Lois LeGrand; Clodis Yarber, a minor, bySamuel Yarber, his father and next friend; Samuel Yarber;Earline Caldwell; Lillie Caldw

NO. 12-08-00397-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, §

NO. 12-08-00397-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, § L.P., ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, L.P., ORIGINAL PROCEEDING AND HOUSTON PIPE LINE CO., L.P., § RELATORS NO. 12-08-00422-CV IN RE: JOEY COURTNEY, MOLINA § COURTNEY, MARCS HAVARD, MELISSA HAVARD, WILLIAM E. WINDSOR, BONNIE R. WINDSOR, PAT GRAY, KENNE

963 F.Supp. 120 (1997) Concetta DeSARIO, Betty Emerson, and Caroline Stevenson, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. Joyce A. THOMAS, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Social Services, in her Official Capacity v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in her Official Capacity. No. 396cv646 (JBA). United States District Co

883 So.2d 1173 (2004) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Ezell "Boggie" a/k/a "Boogie" THOMAS, Deceased: Sharon Haley, Jannie Collins, Derick Thomas, Eric Thomas, Timothy Thomas, Lynn Vallian, Dezie Haley, Gayle Haley, Demetria Murry, Jimmy Dale Dixon, Ray Joseph Fountain, Delanious Grinnell and Marion Oliver v. Glenda Joyce THOMAS, Administratrix. No. 2002-CT-01230-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi.</

OPINION GODDARD, Judge. In this case Joyce A. Hicks sued Sovran Bank/Chattanooga, successor to Commerce Union Bank, for converting two certificates of deposits owned by her to pay an indebtedness of Hicks & Associates, Inc., an insurance concern owned by her husband, Richard Hicks. The Bank contended that a guaranty signed by Mrs. Hicks authorized its action. After the jury respond

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777

642 F.3d 765 (2011) Raymond T. BALVAGE and Deborah A. Balvage, husband and wife; Charles E. Weaver and Susan M. Weaver, husband and wife; Joyce Marie Adams; Luvern Harland Allen; Edgar Ames; James Alvin Baker and Darla Jean Baker, husband and wife; Ralph Alvin Barfell, Jr.; Sharon Marie Banta; Ray Bodine and Janie Kay Bodine, husband and wife; Richard Anthony Braga, Jr. and Margaret Louise Braga, husband and wife; Charles Thomas Caldwell and Sandi Kay Ca

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: We hold that a residential community that has continuously operated as a retirement community for persons age 55 or older can qualify for the housing for older persons exemption from the Fair Housing Act’s prohibition on familial status discrimination by establishing that it currently satisfies the exemption’s three statutory and regulatory criteria at the time of t

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. Raymond Revells and his wife, Amanda Karklis, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions for new trial following their convictions by a jury of three counts of cruelty to a child, L. R.,1 Raymond Revells’ then nearly four-year-old daughter.2 Revells and Karklis both challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Karklis additionally chal

STEPHEN R. BOOHER, Circuit Judge. Amended order: This cause having come on to be heard upon all pending motions, and the court having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, all pending motions before the court are disposed of as follows — (1) There being no objection from counsel for defendant, Broward County, et al., and intervenor, PERC, plaintiffs’ various

640 S.E.2d 587 (2006) REVELLS v. The STATE. Karklis v. The State. Nos. A06A1540, A06A1541. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 25, 2006. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. *589 Clark C. Adams, Jr., Columbus, for appellant (case no. A06A1540). James D. Lamb, Waycross, for appellant (case

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si