Cases

ORDER THAT: (1) THE ALJ’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING IS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND IS REVERSED; (2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AWARDING BENEFITS; AND (3) THIS CASE IS CLOSED TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This is a Social Security disability benefits appeal. At issue is whether the administrative law judge (the “ALJ”) erred in finding Plaintiff “not disabled” from August 25,

169 P.3d 14 (2007) Ray and Julie BIGGERS, husband and wife; Andy Mueller d/b/a Mueller Construction and Andy Mueller, individually; Craig and Sandy Powell, d/b/a Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc., and Home Builders Association of Kitsap County, Respondents, v. CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, Petitioner. No. 77150-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued March 16, 2006.

¶1 J.M. Johnson, J. Today, we review the city of Bainbridge Island (City) City Council’s adoption of rolling moratoria, which imposed a multi-year freeze on private property development in shoreline areas. The City denied the processing of permit applications for more than three years. There is no state statutory authority for the City’s moratoria or for these multiple extensions. Clearly, this usurpation of sta

274 S.E.2d 236 (1981) In re BIGGERS, Two Minor Children. No. 8019DC447. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 20, 1981. *239 Williams, Willeford, Boger, Grady & Davis by Samuel F. Davis, Jr., Concord and Forbis & Grossman by Steven A. Grossman, Kannapolis, for petitioner-appellee. Johnson, Belo & Plummer by James

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge ALARCÓN. OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: In this opinion, we consider whether a settlement agreement between the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”) and a large number of its customers is lawful. We invalidated a previous settlement between BPA and a class of customers because it did not comply with the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning an

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 70 Docket Nos. DE-0752-12-0039-I-3 DE-0752-12-0040-I-3 Kristi L. Putnam, Appellant, v. Department of Homeland Security,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 70 Docket Nos. DE-0752-12-0039-I-3 DE-0752-12-0040-I-3 Kristi L. Putnam, Appellant, v. Department of Homeland Security,

Chief Judge KATZMANN dissents in a separate opinion. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: magistrate judge. *152For nearly seventy years, antibiotics have provided dramatic medical advances in the treatment of bacterial infections.1 *153For nearly as long, scientists have

USCA11 Case: 24-10875 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2025 Page: 1 of 45 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10875 ____________________ FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,

PER CURIAM: Petitioners brought two separate challenges, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to the decision of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) not to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) covering its Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for model years 1987-88 and 1989. As to MYs 1987 and 1988, we *82hol

912 F.2d 478 286 U.S.App.D.C. 78, 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,170 CITY OF LOS ANGELES and City of New York, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Respondents,Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Ford Motor Company,General Motors Corporation, Intervenors.CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, et al., Petitioners,v.Diane K. STEED, Administrator, National Highway TrafficSafety Ad

228 Miss. 789 (1956) 89 So.2d 727 MILLS v. MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION No. 40210. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 8, 1956. Jackson & Ross, Jackson, for appellant. *792 Harry M. Bryan, Jackson, for appellee. *793

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Stephen Sprinkle, a social security disability claimant, sought an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”). While the EAJA contains a presumptive rate cap of $125 an hour, courts may award enhanced fees where they are justified because of an increase in the cost of living. The district court found that Sprinkle was entit

ORDER Patricia Milliken applied for Disability Insurance Benefits alleging disability due to multiple sclerosis (“MS”), right shoulder pain, and a back injury. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) decided that Mil-liken was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act through her date last insured. The district court upheld the denial of benefits. Milliken appeals, and we affirm. I. Background

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING FOR IMMEDIATE AWARD OF BENEFITS CYNTHIA IMBROGNO, United States Magistrate Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 13, 19. Attorney Kenneth Isserlis represents Cindy Lee Tully (Plaintiff); Special Assistant United States Michael S. Howard represents the Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant). The p

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0062p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PAULA S. LINDEN, │ Plaintiff-Appel

Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge This case concerns the Client Solutions Manager ("CSM") position at Facebook, Inc., and whether that role constitutes an "overtime-exempt" position under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and Illinois Minimum Wage Law ("IMWL"). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 48) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification of an FLSA collective action (D

320 F.Supp.2d 1227 (2004) Sharon Latricia KING, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 02-G-2555-W. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Western Division. June 1, 2004. *1228 George W. Harris, George W. Harris PC, Tuscaloosa, AL, for plaintiff. Alice H. Martin, U.S.

664 F.Supp.2d 544 (2009) Henry L. PARKER, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. C.A. No. 6:07-3274-PMD-WMC. United States District Court, D. South Carolina. March 27, 2009. *547 W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, SC, for Plaintiff. Beth Drake, U.S. Attorneys Office, Columbia, SC,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1172 MILTON GEOVANNY VARGAS PANCHI; AIDI VERONICA CONDOR LASSO; M.A.V.C.; J.N.V.C., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS