⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bill Allen Clements”

District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 830 F. Supp. 2d 1111; 86 Fed. R. Serv. 1437; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129380; 2011 WL 5515515
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS KAREN L. STROMBOM, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 56. The parties have consented to have this matter heard by the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2016-11-08 · Published · cited 28× · 66 Va. App. 714; 791 S.E.2d 750; 2016 Va. App. LEXIS 296
*716 ATLEE, Judge. A judge of the Circuit Court of Smyth County (“the trial court”) convicted Robert Allen Hutton of taking indecent liberties with a child. Hutton now appeals that felony conviction. He claims that “the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that [he] maintained the sta
Evans v. Allenpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2012-02-02 · Published · cited 14× · 358 S.W.3d 358; 2011 WL 5104360
358 S.W.3d 358 (2011) Ollie L. EVANS, Appellant, v. Betty J. ALLEN, Appellee. No. 01-10-00766-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). October 27, 2011. Reconsideration En Banc Overruled February 2, 2012. *360 Christine Sampson Willie, Law Offices of Christine S. Willie, Joseph Rutherford Willie II, Wi
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
MANDATE THE STATE OF TEXAS TO THE 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on August 19, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between Tina M. Allen Souza, Appellant V. Heather Clement Tessmer, Appellee No. 04-15-00153-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-CI-15319 was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-02-18 · Published · cited 124× · 916 F.3d 464
PER CURIAM: This case is a § 1983 action arising from the deadly shooting of a young man by Kaufman County law enforcement officers responding to a 911 call. The district court dismissed all claims against the individual officers and the county. We now AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part. BACKGROUND I. The use of
Clement v. Danielspublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006-05-17 · Published · cited 8× · 235 S.W.3d 521; 366 Ark. 352
235 S.W.3d 521 (2006) John Mark CLEMENT, Appellant, v. Charlie DANIELS, Arkansas Secretary of State, State Board of Elections Commission, Bill Halter, Appellee. No. 06-519. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 17, 2006. *522 Whetstone & Spears, by Joe Woodson, Jr., Don Spears, Bud Whetstone, and Kevin Odum, Little Rock, for appella
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-04-03 · Published · cited 87× · 920 F.3d 729
GILMAN, Circuit Judge: *731 Almus Taylor died from internal bleeding after being kept in a jail holding cell overnight. Bonny Edward Taylor, Almus's father and the Administrator of Almus's estate, sued the jail guards under
State v. Clementspublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 665 So. 2d 137; 94 La.App. 4 Cir. 2217; 1995 La. App. LEXIS 3120; 1995 WL 684817
| iBYRNES, Judge. Thaddeus Clements was charged by bill of indictment with second degree murder, a violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1. A jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter, and the trial judge sentenced him to serve twenty-one years at hard labor. The defendant appealed, and in an unpublished opinion, this Court affirmed the conviction but vacated the sentence and remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. <
Michigan Supreme Court · 2020-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00153-CV Tina M. Allen SOUZA, Appellant v. Heather Clement TESSMER,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00153-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/23/2015 11:47:20
Court of Appeals of Utah · 1995-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 893 P.2d 1078; 261 Utah Adv. Rep. 39; 1995 Utah App. LEXIS 26; 1995 WL 156431
OPINION We have determined that "[t]he facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument." Utah R.App.P. 29(a)(3). William Clements seeks review of a decision of the Utah State Tax Commission (Commission) holding him liable for unpaid state income taxes for the years 1987-1991 and for a penalty for intent to evade taxes. We affirm in part, and reverse and rema
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 11, 2010 Session BRENDA JOHNSON HEAD v. MICHAEL ALLEN HEAD Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2007D-341 Tom E. Gray, Chancellor No. M2009-01351-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 30, 2010 This is a divorce action in which Husband appeals the valuation and division of marital proper
Allen v. Daypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006-08-11 · Published · cited 13× · 213 S.W.3d 244; 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 542; 2006 WL 2354799
213 S.W.3d 244 (2006) Kimberly Kay ALLEN, et al. v. John DAY, et al. and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., d/b/a the Tennessean, et al. v. Powers Management, LLC. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. February 24, 2006 Session. August 11, 2006. Permission to Appeal Denied December 27, 2006.
Durham v. Clementspublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988-04-11 · Published · cited 2× · 367 S.E.2d 174; 295 S.C. 90; 1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 44
295 S.C. 90 (1988) 367 S.E.2d 174 Pamela DURHAM, Respondent v. Stephen A. CLEMENTS, Appellant. 1133 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 21, 1988. Decided April 11, 1988. *91 Edward R. Cole, of Drennan, Shelor, Cole & Evans, Spartanburg, for appellant.</
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2011-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 27, 2011 In The Court of Appeals
Sullivan v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999-07-09 · Published · cited 3× · 742 So. 2d 202; 1999 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 195; 1999 WL 463471
The appellant, Douglas Sullivan, was convicted of the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, i.e., cocaine, a violation of § 13A-12-211(a), Ala. Code 1975. He was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, enhanced by an additional 5 years' imprisonment under § 13A-12-270, Ala. Code 1975 (sale within a 3-mile radius of a public housing project), and by and additional 5 years' imprisonment under §
Gray v. Kiegerpublic domain
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989-07-18 · Published · cited 5× · 540 N.E.2d 1344; 27 Mass. App. Ct. 583; 1989 Mass. App. LEXIS 432
27 Mass. App. Ct. 583 (1989) 540 N.E.2d 1344 CLEMENT GRAY vs. A. BILL KIEGER. No. 88-P-805. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. April 10, 1989. July 18, 1989. Present: ARMSTRONG, KAPLAN, & DREBEN, JJ. James D. St. Clair (Mark G. Matuschak with him) for the defendant. R. Robert Popeo</
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-09-11 · Published · cited 26× · 767 F.3d 430
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: In this Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”) case, plaintiff-appellee Ralph S. Janvey, the Receiver for the Stanford entities, seeks to recover funds that were paid to defendants-appellants,- purchasers of certificate of deposits from Stanford International Bank, Ltd., as
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-06-19 · Published · cited 38× · 756 F.3d 327; 2014 WL 2782227
FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Before the court is the appeal of a district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the ease. Defendants-Appellants argue that the court erred in remanding the case to state court. Plaintiff-Appellee moves to dismiss the case, arguing that removal was improper and that we lack jurisdiction to review the remand order.