Cases

OPINION BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Earl M. Bird challenges the district court’s judgment upholding the decision of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying his application for disability benefits. The SSA determined that although Bird suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), this condition was not disabling

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Social Security Administration denied Douglas Bird’s application for disability insurance benefits. After he sought judicial review, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner agreed with him that the agency’s adverse decision should be set *912 aside and moved that the matter b

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge LUTTIG joined. OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Terry M. Mitchell appeals an order of the district court affirming a denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) under the Social Security

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1578 RICKY E. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Distri

DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. # 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommend

594 F.3d 504 (2010) Jimmy Dearl EALY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-5451. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: January 12, 2010. Decided and Filed: February 5, 2010. *506 ON BRIEF: Julie Atkins, Atkins Law Office, Harlan, Kentucky, for App

43 F.Supp.2d 1286 (1999) Roslyn J. BIRD, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. Civ. 2:96-CV0841S. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 22, 1999. *1287 Carlie Christensen, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, for plaintiff. W. Paul Wharto

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0026p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JIMMY DEARL EALY,

804 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2011) Katherine J. GUNTHER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Case No. 09-6293-KI. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. March 29, 2011. *1080 Alan Stuart Graf, Attorney at Law, Summertown, TN, for Plaintiff. Dwight C. Holton, United States

*1044ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge United States District Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and' Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that the defendant

OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge. Pauline Thomas worked as an elevator operator until her position was eliminated. Claiming a heart condition and related medical problems, she applied for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. The Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denied her' application, and an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) also determined that Thomas w

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Tina Heard, Pearline Snow, and Carolyn Graham, filed this putative class action against the defendants — the United States Social Security Administration (“SSA”), the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), and the District of Columbia (“District”)— challengi

COFFEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The issue on appeal is whether the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision to deny disability insurance benefits to the claimant, Patty Carradine, is supported by substantial evidence. In his decision, the ALJ determined that Carradine’s testimo*757ny regarding the extent of her allegedly disabling pain was less

OPINION OF THE COURT OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge. William Morales appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Brody, Judge) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate (Scuderi, M.J.) affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s conclusion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2263 ___________________________ Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice; Jane Doe; Elizabeth Roe Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Brenna Bird, in her official capacity as Attorney General of

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2141 LAKENISHA DOWLING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.

63 S.W.3d 734 (2001) STATE of Tennessee ex rel. COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION v. MEDICINE BIRD BLACK BEAR WHITE EAGLE, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. July 11, 2001. Permission to Appeal Denied December 10, 2001. *741 Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Michael Moore, Solicitor General, for ap

OPINION LAMBERTH, Senior District Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. Rahinah Ibrahim appeals the district court’s award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). She co

490 S.E.2d 754 (1997) 200 W.Va. 667 Ward W. KEESECKER, II, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Walter M. BIRD, Committee for Emily Keesecker, and Arch Steiner, Committee for Emily Keesecker, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 23386. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 4, 1997. Decided July 14, 1997.

731 A.2d 660 (1999) Margaret BIRD and H. Paul Bird, Petitioners, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 11, 1999. Decided June 3, 1999. *661 David L. Narkiewicz, Montgomeryville, for petitioners. Lesley Smith Oakes, Philadelphia, for respondent. Bef