Cases

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge ■ I. INTRODUCTION Imagine a fictional Florida county — I’ll call it Marshall County — with a total een-*1295sus population of 12,000. Marshall County is run by a board of commissioners comprised of five people, each of whom is elected from a

2 A.3d 963 (2010) 123 Conn.App. 583 Karen DiPIETRO et al. v. FARMINGTON SPORTS ARENA, LLC. No. 29175. Appellate Court of Connecticut. September 14, 2010. *968 Ralph W. Johnson III, with whom were Coleman C. Duncan III and, on the brief, David G. Hill, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff). Christo

214 B.R. 260 (1997) Michael B. FEINMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Vivien LOMBARDO, Individually and as Trustee of 49 Edge Hill Realty Trust, Pio Lombardo, as Trustee of 49 Edge Hill Trust, Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-12065-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 27, 1997. *261

604 F.Supp.2d 983 (2009) LAKELAND REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM, a Michigan corporation, Lakeland Hospitals at Niles and St. Joseph, Inc., a Michigan corporation,[1] and Lakeland Regional Health System Group Health Plan, an Erisa self-funded employer group health plan, Plaintiffs, v. WALGREENS HEALTH INITIATIVES, INC., f/k/a WHP Health Initiatives, Inc., a foreign corporation, and Rite-Aid Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendants.<

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(2008) UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS and Kansas Athletics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Larry SINKS, Clark Orth, Larry Sinks Enterprises, Inc. and Victory Sportswear, L.L.C. (collectively d/b/a/ Joe-College.com), Defendants. No. 06-2341-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 19, 2008. Opinion Denying Reconsideration May 13, 2008. MEMORANDUM

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'

328 Mass. 315 (1952) 103 N.E.2d 716 JOHN DIAMOND vs. JASPER GANCI & another. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. October 22, 1951. January 23, 1952. Present: QUA, C.J., LUMMUS, WILKINS, WILLIAMS, & COUNIHAN, JJ. C. Sallet, for the defendant Bishop. W.A. McGivney, for the plaintiff. WILK

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

L. HAND, Chief Judge. Both parties appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for a libel. The defendant’s appeal is based upon the admission of irrelevant and incompetent evidence as to damages; the plaintiff’s is from an order which granted a new trial unless she consented to reduce her damages from $20,000 to $15,000, which she did. The plaintif

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

12 F.2d 721 (1926) UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION v. ROSENBERG BROS. & CO. SAME v. CALIFORNIA WINE ASS'N. SAME v. S. L. JONES & CO. Nos. 4748-4750. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 10, 1926. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1926. Ira S. Lillick and Chalmers G. Graham, both of San Francis

297 F.Supp. 1165 (1968) The JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY v. James M. HUTTON, Jr., et al. Civ. No. 15098. United States District Court D. Maryland. August 15, 1968. Supplementary Opinion December 10, 1968. *1166 *1167 *1168

44 F.2d 967 (1930) UNITED STATES v. SPRAGUE et al. District Court, D. New Jersey. December 16, 1930. Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J. Frederic M. P. Pearse, of Newark, N. J. (Selden Bacon, Daniel F. Cohalan, and Julius Henry Cohen, all of New York City, of counsel), for Defendants. CLARK, District Judge. The traditional method of adopting amendment

Hosmer, Ch. J. Arthur W. Magill and others, having enter ed into an association for the manufacture of cloths, procured from the legislature a charter of incorporation. Apprehensive that a grant in the usual manner, whereby the corporate funds are alone liable to creditors, would be injurious to the community, the legislature annexed to the charter this proviso, “that the persons and properly of the members of said corpor

STATEMENT. WOODSON, J. This is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted in this court on March 29, 1905, by the Attorney-General, to forfeit the charter of the Waters-Pierce Oil Company, which will hereafter be called the Waters-Pierce Company, and to revoke the licenses to do business in this State of the Standard Oil Company of Indiana, which will hereafter be called the Indiana

Doe, J. I. The dwelling place of Isaac, at the time of the division of the town cf Lyman, was in the part then made a separate town by-the name of Monroe; and the defendant claims that Volney, being a minor, could then have had no other dwelling place than that of his father, within the meaning of the Eevised Statutes relating to the settlement of paupers as affected by the division of towns. Upon the division