Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Black Lives Matter D.C. v. William Barr”
Black Lives Matter D.C. v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C., et al., Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-1469 (DLF) (LEAD) v. No. 20-cv-1542 (DLF) (Consolidated) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Black Lives Matter D.C. v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C., et al., Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-1469 (DLF) (LEAD) v. No. 20-cv-1542 (DLF) (Consolidated) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Black Lives Matter D.C. v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C., et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-1469 (DLF) WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This lawsuit arises out of the law-enforcement response to protests in Lafayette Square on June 1,
Radiya Buchanan v. William Barrpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 4, 2023 Decided June 23, 2023 No. 22-5133 RADIYA BUCHANAN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WILLIAM P. BARR, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 22-5139 Appeals from the United Stat
Todd William Barr v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed February 26, 2021 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-19-00040-CR __________ TODD WILLIAM BARR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
Eva Gonzalez Romo v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EVA ISABEL GONZALEZ ROMO, Eva No. 16-71559 AKA Eva Isabel Romo, Petitioner, Agency No. A047-334-955 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitt
Jose Duran-Rodriguez v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE JESUS DURAN- No. 16-72957 RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, Agency No. A093-457-361 v. William P. Barr, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Imm
Manuel Guzman-Vazquez v. William P. Barrpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0155p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MANUEL GUZMAN-VAZQUEZ, ┐ Petitioner, │ │
Francisco Lopez Gamero v. William P. Barrpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-3198 & 18-1104 FRANCISCO LOPEZ GAMERO, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petitions for Revi
Francisco Lopez Gamero v. William P. Barrpublic domain
Sykes, Circuit Judge. Francisco Lopez Gamero, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident of the United States, faces removal because of two state drug convictions. An immigration judge found him removable as an alien convicted of the aggravated felony of "illicit trafficking in a controlled substance."
Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. Barrpublic domain
Barrett, Circuit Judge, dissenting. History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. But that power extends only to people who are dangerous . Founding-era legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons. Nor have the parties introduced any evidence that founding-era legislatures
Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. Barrpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1478 RICKEY I. KANTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United Sta
Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Genpublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD , Circuit Judge : Melida Teresa Luna-Garcia, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of the denial of her motion to reopen. For the following reasons, we deny her petition for review. I.
Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Genpublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: The panel opinion previously issued in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place. Melida Teresa Luna-Garcia, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of the denial of her motion to reopen. For the following reason
Jose Ramos-Portillo v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gepublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Jose Nicolas Ramos-Portillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismissed his appeal of the denial of his motion to reopen. We deny Ramos-Portillo's petition for review. I. In 1993, Ramos-Portillo entered the United States wi
Saulsberry v. Barrpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) TERRY SAULSBERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 17-cv-
Matthews v. Barrpublic domain
Carney, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. New York Penal Law ("NYPL") § 260.10(1) provides in relevant part, "A person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a child when: (1) He or she knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old. ..." The Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") has found the far-ranging and vague
Mendez v. Barrpublic domain
18-801 Mendez v. Barr 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2018 7 8 No. 18-801 9 10 TOMAS MENDEZ, 11 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 15
Diaz Ortiz v. Barrpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1620 CRISTIAN JOSUE DIAZ ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before
Hernandez Lara v. Barrpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1524 ANA RUTH HERNANDEZ LARA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before