Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Black v. Christie's, Inc.”
Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.public domain
ORDER Per Curiam. Upon consideration of the above-captioned appeal, It Is Ordered That: 1) Appeal 2016-2499 is dismissed as moot. 2) No costs.
Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.public domain
JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.public domain
EDMUNDS, Justice. Defendants GrailCoat Worldwide, LLC and GrailCo, Inc. (collectively, “GrailCoat”) provided an express twenty-year warranty for its *535 product SuperFlex, 1 a stucco-like material that plaintiffs purchased to cover the ext
Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.public domain
BRYANT, Judge. Where the six-year statute of repose barred plaintiffs’ action despite a twenty year express warranty, we affirm the order of the trial court. *285 Facts and Procedural History Plaintiffs George and Deborah Christie filed a complaint against defendants Hartley Construction, Inc., (Hartley), GrailCoat Worl
Christie v. Estatepublic domain
ANDERSON, Justice. This dispute is on its second appeal, following two jury trials, and requires us to decide whether the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard or the clear-and-convincing-evidence standard applies when determining the existence of an oral contract for the conveyance of farmland when only money damages are sought for the claimed breach of that contract. James Christie claims that his parents, Dilman and Dorothy Chri
Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co.public domain
*902Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co.public domain
*902Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Petta v. Christie Business Holding Co.public domain
2023 IL App (5th) 220742 NOTICE Decision filed 11/28/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-22-0742 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ REBE
Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Electric, Inc.public domain
244 P.3d 166 (2010) BRIAN AND CHRISTIE, INC., an Idaho corporation, dba Taco Time, an assumed business name, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEISHMAN ELECTRIC, INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. 35929-2008. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, September 2010 Term. November 24, 2010. *168 R
Robert Martin Thompson v. Christie Lee Thompsonpublic domain
02/09/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2021 Session ROBERT MARTIN THOMPSON v. CHRISTIE LEE THOMPSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 2015-CV-229 Amy V. Hollars, Judge ___________________________________
In re Christie's Appointmentpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by YANNOTTI, P.J.A.D. Stephen M. Sweeney, in his capacity as Senate President, appeals from Governor Chris Christie’s appointment of Martin Perez as a public member of the Rutgers University Board of Governors. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Governor’s appointment was a proper exercise of his authority under N.J.S.A. 18A:65-14.
King v. Christiepublic domain
OPINION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge. On August 19, 2013, New Jersey Governor Christopher J. Christie signed into law Assembly Bill Number A3371 (“A3371”) (codified at N.J.S.A. 45:1-54, -55),1 which prohibits New Jersey state licensed practitioners, who provide professional counseling services, from treating minors using methods of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (“SOCE”
313 Ga. 375 FINAL COPY S21A1261, S21A1262, S21X1326, S22X0007. BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC. et al. v. KEMP et al.; and vice versa (four cases). S21A1263. SAUNDERS v. KEMP et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. On March 25, 2021, Governor Brian Kemp signed into law Senate Bill 9 (“SB 9”), which created from the former Augusta Judicial Circuit two new judicial circuits: the Columbia Judicial Circuit, comprised of Columbia County, and the Augu
United States v. Sherryanne Christiepublic domain
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the federal government may criminally prosecute two ministers of the Hawaii Cannabis Ministry who admit to using and distributing large quantities of cannabis, but who claim that in doing so they were merely exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs. I
Martin v. Blackpublic domain
909 S.W.2d 192 (1995) Josephine MARTIN, Appellant, v. Dan BLACK; Mary Patricia Black; W.H. Black; Brazco Development, Inc.; Black Ranch Partnership; Dan P. and W.H. Black Partnership; James Alsup; and Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, P.C., Appellees. No. 14-94-00531-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). September 21, 1995. Rehearing Overruled Novembe
Christie v. Kimballpublic domain
Opinion GILBERT, P. J. In probate court, nothing speaks more eloquently or provides more insight into factual and legal issues than an accounting. Here the probate court lacked sufficient information to mle on three consolidated cases involving a trust. It determined that an accounting could well serve that purpose. We conclude the probate court’s general power to supervise administratio
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, Remanded, and Opinion filed December 6, 2018. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00748-CV TEXAS BLACK IRON, INC., Appellant v. ARAWAK ENERGY INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas
Stanley Christie v. Georgia-Pacific Companypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STANLEY CHRISTIE, No. 17-70853 Petitioner, BRB No. v. 16-0321 GEORGIA-PACIFIC COMPANY; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; OPINION DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM,
Bryan Black v. Smith Protective Services, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00969-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/17/2015 3:43:30 PM
State of Tennessee v. Edythe Christiepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 4, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EDYTHE CHRISTIE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 14-461 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02485-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 30, 2016 _______________________________